Advertisement

The Shield as a Poetic Screen: Early Blazon and the Visualization of Medieval German Literature

  • Haiko Wandhoff
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

E laborately decorated shields are a remarkable literary motif that one finds in texts from antiquity, throughout the Middle Ages, and into the Early Modern period.1 The poetic device of shield-description reflects a social practice, for premodern warriors and knights not only valued their round or oval shields, usually made of wood, for protection, but also used them to indicate visually the social and genealogical status of their bodies that they shielded. Indeed it is in this context, as easily accessible visible displays of personal data, that painted shields became privileged objects of poetic representation. Rooted in the rhetorical technique of enargtia (evidentia), which was developed to bring before a reader’s eyes what is in fact merely a verbal report, rounded shields associated with significant bodies provided ideal graphic surfaces on which poets could project different kinds of visual data. The decorated shield thus executes what Murray Krieger calls the “ekphrastic principle” of literature, that is, the desire of the verbal arts “to do the work of the visual sign” and convert readers into eyewitnesses.2

Keywords

Thirteenth Century Early Modern Period Epic Poetry Latin Literature Vernacular Literature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Murray Krieger, Ekphrasis: The Illusion of the Natural Sign (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992), p. 4. See also Haiko Wandhoff, “Velden und visieren, blüemen und florieren: Zur Poetik der Sichtbarkeit in den höfischen Epen des Mittelalters,” Zeitschrift für Germanistik N.F. 9 (1999): 586–92 [586–97].Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Andrew Sprague Becker, The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis (Boston: Rowman and Littlefield, 1995), p. 25Google Scholar
  3. James A.W Heffernan, The Museum of Words: The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbury (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), p. 3.Google Scholar
  4. Heffernan cites WJ. Thomas Mitchell, “Ekphrasis and the Other,” South Atlantic Quarterly 91 (1992): 696 [695–719]. See also Becker, Shield of Achilles, p. 2.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    WJ. Thomas Mitchell, “Ekphrasis and the Other,” Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), p. 180 [151–81].Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Virgil, “Aeneis,” in P Vergili Maronis Opera, ed. R.A.B. Mynorsa (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), pp. 103–424.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Angus Fletcher, Allegory. The Theory of a Symbolic Mode (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1964), p. 116.Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    Gerard J. Brault, Early Blazon: Heraldic Terminology in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries with Special Reference to Arthurian Heraldry, 2nd edn. (Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell Press, 1997), p. 8.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    Anthony Wagner, Heralds and Heraldry in the Middle Ages, 2nd edn. (1959; repr. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 12.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    Manfred Zips, Das Wappenwesen in der mittelhochdeutschen Epik bis 1250 (Ph.D. diss., Vienna, 1966), p. 1.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    Herbort von Fritzlar, Liet von Troye, ed. G. Karl Frommann (Quedlinburg: Basse, 1837), commentary to the edition, p. 233.Google Scholar
  12. 22.
    Konrad von Würzburg, DerTrojanische Krieg, ed. Adelbert von Keller, G. Karl Frommann et al. (Stuttgart: Litterarischer Verein, 1858).Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    Heinrich von Veldeke, Eneasroman, ed. and trans. Dieter Kartschoke (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1986).Google Scholar
  14. 27.
    James Parker, A Glossary of Terms Used in Heraldry (Rutland: Tuttle, 1970), p. 64.Google Scholar
  15. 30.
    Marianne Shapiro, “Ekphrasis in Virgil and Dante,” Comparative Literature 42 (1990): 97 [97–113].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 40.
    Wolfram von Eschenbach, Parzival, ed. Karl Lachmann and Bernd Schirok (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998).Google Scholar
  17. 43.
    Joachim Bumke, Geschichte der deutschen Literatur im hohen Mittelalter (Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1990), p. 103.Google Scholar
  18. 53.
    Gottfried von Strassburg, Tristan, ed. and trans. Rüdiger Krohn, 3 vols. (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1980).Google Scholar
  19. 57.
    Matthias Lexer, Mittelhochdeutsches Taschenwörterbuch, 34th edn. (Stuttgart: Hirzel, 1976), p. 265. There is no entry in Georg F. Benecke, Wilhelm Müller, and Friedrich K.T. Zarncke, Mittelhochdeutsches Wörterbuch, vol. 3 (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1861).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kathryn Starkey and Horst Wenzel 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haiko Wandhoff

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations