Federalism and Freedom: A Critique
It will be necessary to define, as briefly as possible, the meaning of the term “federalism” before we can answer the two fundamental questions:
Is there a value which inheres in federalism as such?
Are there goals that can be attained only through federalism?
KeywordsFederal State Unitary State Civil Liberty Party System Direct Democracy
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.See K.C. Wheare, Federal Government, New York, Oxford University Press, 1947, p. 15.Google Scholar
- 2.Based upon C. Bougie, La sociologie de Proudhon, Paris, A. Colin, 1911;Google Scholar
- H. Bourgin, Proudhon, Paris, G. Bellais, 1901.Google Scholar
- 3.Fordetails see Alexander Gray, The Socialist Tradition, Moses to Lenin, London, Longmans, Green, 1947, pp. 230–256; andGoogle Scholar
- G.D.H. Cole, Socialist Thought, The Forerunners, 1789–1850, London, Macmillan, 1953, pp. 201–218.Google Scholar
- 4.Quotations taken from G. Himmelfarb, Lord Acton, A Study in Conscience and Politics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1952; a, p. 220; b, p. 139; c, p. 161.Google Scholar
- 8.Bowring, ed., Vol. IX, pp. 41 et seq.; and Elie Halévy, The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism, trans, by Mary Morris, New York, Macmillan, 1928, pp. 458–459.Google Scholar
- 10.Cf. Carl J. Friedrich, Constitutional Government and Democracy, Boston, Ginn & Co., 1946, pp. 216–217.Google Scholar
- 11.Rudolf Schlesinger, Federalism in Central and Eastern Europe, New York, Oxford University Press, 1945, p. 71.Google Scholar
- 13.For details see Oscar Jászi, The Dissolution of the Hapsburg Monarchy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1929, pp. 271 et seq.; R. Schlesinger, op. cit., pp. 184 et seq. Google Scholar
- 14.See Eldridge Foster Dowell, A History of Criminal Syndicalism Legislation in the United States, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1939.Google Scholar
- 20.For the dismal record of the states in preserving civil liberties, see Walter Gellhorn, ed., The States and Subversion, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
- 28.Gilbert Chinard, ed., Jefferson’s Commonplace Book, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press, 1926, p. 267.Google Scholar
- 29.See Friedrich Ratzel, Politische Geographie, 3d ed., Munich and Berlin, R. Oldenbourg, 1923.Google Scholar
- 30.Carl J. Friedrich, Constitutional Government and Democracy, Revised edition, Boston, Ginn & Co., 1950, pp. 546–570.Google Scholar
- 33.Roscoe Pound, “Law and Federal Government,” in Federalism as a Democratic Process. Essays by Roscoe Pound, Charles H. McIlwain, and Roy F. Nichols, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 1942. Pound equates, or confuses, localism and federalism: “Even if the lines cannot be drawn at any one time absolutely—and in law and politics which deal with life none can be so drawn—the national and the local are distinct at the core, and the experience of English-speaking peoples has shown that local matters are best dealt with in the locality instead of by postulated ex officio supermen at a distance” (p. 21).Google Scholar
- 34.A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Ninth Edition, ed. by E.C.S. Wade, London, Macmillan, 1950. “Our survey from a legal point of view of the characteristics common to all federal government forcibly suggests conclusions of more than merely legal interest, as to the comparative merits of federal government, and the system of Parliamentary sovereignty. “Federal government means weak government.” ...no more curious instance can be found of the inconsistent currents of popular opinion which may at the same time pervade a nation or a generation than the coincidence in England of a vague admiration for federalism alongside with a far more decided feeling against the doctrines of so-called laissez faire. A system meant to maintain the status quo in politics is incompatible with schemes for wide social innovation. “Federalism tends to produce conservatism. “... The difficulty of altering the constitution produces conservative sentiment, and national conservatism doubles the difficulty of altering the constitution ... To this one must add that a federal constitution always lays down general principles which, from being placed in the constitution, gradually come to command a superstitious reverence, and thus are in fact, though not in theory, protected from change or criticism ... “Federalism, lastly, means legalism—the predominance of the judiciary in the constitution—the prevalence of a spirit of legality among the people. “... Federalism substitutes litigation for legislation, and none but a law-fearing people will be inclined to regard the decision of a suit as equivalent to the enactment of a law” (pp. 171–179).Google Scholar
- 35.Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, New York, Knopf, 1945, Vol. I, pp. 271–272.Google Scholar
- 36.John C. Calhoun, A Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States, in The Works, Vol. I, New York, D. Appleton, 1854, pp. 168–169, 233–234, 241, 268, 383–386, 392;Google Scholar
- Konstantin Frantz, Der Foederalismus als das leitende Princip fuer die sociale, staatliche und internationale Organisation ..., Mainz, Kirchheim, 1879.Google Scholar
- 37.For a discussion of this situation in Australia, see A.P. Canaway, The Tailure of Federalism in Australia, London, Oxford University Press, 1930.Google Scholar
- 38.New York, Farrar and Rinehart, 1941. On this problem see, in addition, Harold Laski, “The Obsolescence of Federalism,” The New Republic, Vol. 98 (May 3, 1939), pp. 367–369.Google Scholar
- 45.V.O. Key, Jr., Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, Third Edition, New York, Crowell, 1952, p. 102.Google Scholar
© Dimitrios Karmis and Wayne Norman 2005