Advertisement

Burning Women pp 137-173 | Cite as

Disorderly Wives, Poison, and the Iconography of Female Murderers

  • Pompa Banerjee
Part of the Early Modern Cultural Studies book series (EMCSS)

Abstract

The excavation of the origins of a curious anecdote that recurs in European accounts of sati reminds us that the nightmarish space of fear and dread that the widow often occupied also spilled over to European constructions of other cultures. I explore below another eerie convergence within the contradictory discourses of Hindu widows and European witches, wives, and widows. The image of the sati as a poisoner who was burned as an example to potential husband-killers forms one of the most remarkable crossings between the Hindu sati and European wives and widows. At a time when sensational trials of husband poisoners rocked England, France, and other regions, and the specters of murderous wives, midwives, and witches armed with poison cast long shadows, European travelers’ view of the sati as a husband-poisoner had extraordinary resonance. Although most travelers regarded the Hindu sati as an innocent or saintly victim deluded by a cruel religion, others believed that the sati was burned for poisoning her husband. Scores of travelers repeated the same “reason” for widowburning—it was to prevent Hindu wives from poisoning their husbands. Although the use of this poison story was not limited to the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, it acquired a special urgency in early modern narratives.

Keywords

Title Page Domestic Space Good Wife European Traveler Conjugal Love 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 4.
    Renato Rosaldo, “After Objectivism,” in The Cultural Studies Reader, ed. Simon During (London: Routledge, 1993), 104–17.Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    Robert Coverte, A True and Almost Incredible Report of an Englishman, that being cast away … in Cambaya, the fartherest part of the East Indies) travelled by Land thorow many unknowne kingdomes and great Cities (London, 1631), 35.Google Scholar
  3. 12.
    See The Travels of Fâ-Hien or a Record of Buddhistic Kingdoms, trans. J. Legge (New York: Paragon Book Reprints, 1965), and T. Watters, On Yuan Chwang’s Travels in India A.D. 629–645, ed. T. W. R. Davis and S. W. Bushell (Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1961), 168–74.Google Scholar
  4. 13.
    Al Biruni does not mention the poison story: “If a wife loses her husband by death, she cannot marry another man. She has only to choose between two things—either to remain a widow as long as she lives or to burn herself; and the latter eventuality is considered the preferable, because as a widow she is ill-treated as long as she lives. As regards the wives of the kings they are in the habit of burning them, whether they wish it or not, by which they desire to prevent any of them by chance of committing something unworthy of the illustrious husband. They make an exception only for women of advanced years and for those who have children; for the son is the responsible protector of his mother.” As for the widows who do not burn themselves, “the heir of her deceased husband has to provide her with nourishment and clothing as long as she lives.” Al Biruni appears to suggest that the reason for sati is not poison, but “Jauhar” or “honorable” suicide by the wives of warriors. See Alberuni’s India, trans. E. C. Sachau, ed. Ainslee T. Embree (New York: Norton, 1971), xii–xiii, 155, and 164. For an explanation of the difference between sati and Jauhar, see Veena T. Oldenburg, in J. S. Hawley, ed. Sati, the Blessing and the Curse, 159–73.Google Scholar
  5. 14.
    Ibn Battuta, The Travels of Ibn Battuta A.D. 1325–1354, trans. H. A. R. Gibb (Cambridge: Hakluyt Society, 1971).Google Scholar
  6. 15.
    S. Radhakrishnan and C. A. Moore, A Source Book in Indian Philosophy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957), xviii–xix. Although the epics were composed long before the European travelers discovered the seaways to the East, they were rewritten and adapted for almost every generation, profoundly shaping Hindu culture so that their influence is almost incalculable.Google Scholar
  7. 16.
    See J. A. B. van Buitenen, trans. and ed. The Mahābhārata (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973), xvi–xxiii.Google Scholar
  8. 17.
    For a discussion of the treatment of social issues in The Mahābhārata, see William Buck, Mahabharata (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973); see also S. C. Banerji, Indian Society in The Mahābhārata (Varanasi: Bharata Manisha, 1976).Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    The Mahābhārata 2: 760–778; 1: 155–70. 3: 57. For The Rāmāyana See S. I. Pollock, The Rāmāyana of Vālmīki, ed. R. P. Goldman (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986), 1: 156, 2: 53.Google Scholar
  10. 22.
    Jadunath Sarkar, Mughal Administration (Calcutta: M. C. Sarkar, 1963), 91–115.Google Scholar
  11. 23.
    Abū ‘L-Fazl ‘Allāmī, Ā’īn-i-Akbarī, trans. H. Blochmann, ed. S. L. Goomer (New Delhi: Aadiesh Book Depot, 1965).Google Scholar
  12. 24.
    For one set of crime statistics during this period, see Satya P. Sangar, Crime and Punishment in Mughal India, (Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1967), 98–111. Interestingly, poison becomes an extremely popular choice of weapons by “thuggees,” or highway robbers during the British Raj. For a survey of the extensive incidence of poisoning by thuggees in the nineteenth century, see Charles Hervey, Some Records of Crime: Being the Diary of a Year, Official and Particular, of an Officer of the Thuggee and Dacoitie Police (London: Sampson Low, Marston, and Company, 1892).Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    For the Mughal interdiction against the burning of unwilling widows, see Abū ‘L-Fazl ‘Allāmī, Ā’īn-i-Akbarī, 215; see also Sangar, Crime and Punishment, 159–80; and Sri Ram Sharma, The Religious Policy of the Mughal Emperors, (New York: Asia Publishing House, 1962), 19–112.Google Scholar
  14. 26.
    Mary Louise Pratt, “Scratches on the face of the country; or, what Mr. Barrow saw in the land of the Bushmen,” in ‘Race,’ Writing, and Difference, ed. Henry L. Gates, Jr. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), 138–62.Google Scholar
  15. 27.
    See Montague Summers, Witchcraft and Black Magic (London: Rider and Company, 1953), 138.Google Scholar
  16. 28.
    See Rossell H. Robbins, The Encyclopedia of Witchcraft and Demonology (New York: Crown Publishers, 1959; rpt. 1981), 139–40.Google Scholar
  17. 29.
    See Montague Summers, Witchcraft and Black Magic, 137; and A. Masson, La Sorcellerie et la Science des Poisons au XVIIe Siècle, (Paris: Librarie Hachette, 1904), 119.Google Scholar
  18. 32.
    Chambre ardente was the popular name for the commission de l’Arsenal, the star chamber set up by Louis XIV “to investigate widespread poisoning among the French nobility.” See Rossell H. Robbins, The Encyclopedia of Witchcraft and Demonology, 80–81; see also Lucien Nass, Les Empoisonnements sous Louis XIV D’apres Les Documents Inedits de L’Affaire des Poisons 1679–1682 (Paris: Georges Carre et C. Naud, 1898), 127–28.Google Scholar
  19. 36.
    See Brian P. Levack, ed., Witch-Hunting in Early Modern Europe 7: 163, 164. Ironically, witchcraft and poison are connected in other ways. In her study of the distinct epidemiology related to cases of witch persecutions, Mary Matossian provides epdemiological evidence related to rye consumption in cold wet areas of Europe. She suggests that ergot alkaloid formations may have poisoned rye crops, thereby producing symptoms generally associated with witchcraft. Mary K. Matossian, Poisons of the Past: Molds, Epidemics and History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989), 70–80.Google Scholar
  20. 38.
    E. W. Monter, European Witchcraft (New York: Wiley, 1969), 77–79.Google Scholar
  21. 40.
    Nicholas Remy, Demonolatry, 1: 2, 3–6. Remy’s story is reminiscent of an Indian folk tale of the maiden reared on poison. When she reached adulthood her great beauty attracted many lovers; however, her skin was deadly venom and her lovers died at the slightest touch. Although modern readers might be more familiar with Nathaniel Hawthorne’s treatment of the fable in “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” the story inspired much older texts in India. However, those texts may not have been well known. Mudra Rakshasa, Visakhadatta’s seventh-century Sanskrit text, a complex, privately staged play, probably had limited influence outside the royal court. See Visakhadatta, Rakshasha’s Ring, in Three Sanskrit Plays, trans. and ed. M. Coulson (London: Penguin, 1981), 10. For a discussion of the poison tale and its influence in European texts, see N. M. Penzer, Poison Damsels and Other Essays (London: C. J. Sawyer, 1952).Google Scholar
  22. 50.
    See Charlotte F. Otten, ed. English Women’s Voices 1540–1700 (Miami: Florida International University Press, 1992), 184–85.Google Scholar
  23. 51.
    Ibid., 173.Google Scholar
  24. 52.
    See J. W. Brodie-Innes, Scottish Witchcraf Trials (London: Chiswick Press, 1891), 40–41.Google Scholar
  25. 53.
    Sharpe’s analysis of homicides recorded at the Essex and Northern assizes 1560–1709 concludes that the “most typical background for homicide at this time … was a fight between two men or groups of men which went too far.” J. A. Sharpe, “Domestic Homicide in Early Modern England,” The Historical Journal 24:1 (1981), 24–98. Furthermore, as J. S. Cockburn notes, “on the evidence of assize indictments, wives were the victims in almost three-quarters of marital killing,” J. S. Cockburn, “The Nature and Incidence of Crime in England 1559–1625: A Preliminary Survey,” in Crime in England 1500–1800, ed. J. S. Cockburn (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977), 49–71. According to Natalie Davis, a similar situation obtained in France. See Fiction in the Archives: Pardon Tales and Their Tellers in Sixteenth Century France (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987), 84–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 54.
    Frederick G. Emmison, Elizabethan Life (Chelmsford: Essex County Council, 1970–80), 148–50.Google Scholar
  27. 55.
    Nightmarish cases of hysteria and various psychoses connected women with poison. For example, a 1686 English pamphlet presented the case of an adolescent boy haunted by a “Woman in a blue Jerkin and Red Petticoat, with Yellow and Green patches” who appeared at times as herself and at times as a cat. She apparently willed him to vomit pins, nutshells, nails, sticks, and straws. The terrified boy “would shriek, and cry out that he would not see her, laying his hands over his Eyes and Mouth, and would say with a loud voice, she is putting things into my Mouth, she will Choak me, she will Poyson me.” By the end of the pamphlet, the boy’s hysteria multiplied the single “Woman in a blue Jerkin” into a “Confederacy” of several women waiting to poison him. Peter Jenken, A True Account of a strange and wonderful relation of one John Tonken of Pensans in Cornwall said to be Bewitched by some women (London: George Croom, 1686), 3–6.Google Scholar
  28. 56.
    Frances E. Dolan, “Home-Rebels and House-Traitors: Murderous Wives in Early Modern England,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 4 (1992), 1–37, esp. 9. Interestingly, the nineteenth-century French chronicler of the chambre ardente affair appeared to believe that the temperament and social conditions of early modern women made them, by nature, poisoners: “Les femmes surtout ont pratiqué l’empoisonnement au XVII siècle. Il est certain qu’elles ont toujours tenu la première place dans une telle statisque; les conditions inhérentes à leur sexe, à leur tempérament, en sont la cause”; and “quelle meilleure arme, surtout pour une femme, que le poison?” [Women especially practiced poisoning in the seventeenth century. Certainly, they have always led the statistics in this regard; the inherent conditions of their sex, of their temperament, are the causes”; and “what better weapon, especially for a woman, than poison?”] See Lucien Nass, Les Empoisonnements sous Louis XIV, 16, 19.Google Scholar
  29. 57.
    Female Parricide, 49. Poison also was seen as a weapon of choice for Jews; the Malleus devoted many passages to the subject. In England, the 1594 trial of Lopez, Queen Elizabeth’s physician who was accused of attempting to poison her, provided a dramatic instance of this connection. In the trial, Sir Edward Coke emphasized the nexus: “This Lopez, a perjured traitor and Jewish doctor, worse than Judas himself, undertook the poisoning.” Quoted in G. B. Harrison, Second Elizabethan Journal (London 1931), 289, cited in G. K. Hunter “Elizabethans and Foreigners,” Shakespeare Survey 17 (1964), 37–52.Google Scholar
  30. 58.
    King James I’s The Trew Law of Free Monarchies, in The Political Works of James I, ed. Charles H. McIlwain, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1918), 55.Google Scholar
  31. 61.
    See Gilbert Dugdale, A True Discourse of the Practices of Elizabeth Caldwell (London, 1604).Google Scholar
  32. 62.
    Thomas Kydde, The trueth of the most wicked & secret murthering of John Brewen (London 1592), 9, 11.Google Scholar
  33. 64.
    Betty Travitsky, “Husband-Murder and Petty Treason in English Renaissance Tragedy,” in Renaissance Drama, new series, Disorder and the Drama, ed. Mary Beth Rose (Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press and the Newberry Library, 1990), 1721–98Google Scholar
  34. 66.
    M. L. Wine lists the textual replication of Alice Arden’s 1551 murder of her husband. See Wine, ed., The Tragedy of Master Arden of Faversham (London: Methuen, 1973), xxxvii–xxxviii. There are other references well into the seventeenth century, for example, in Henry Goodcole’s pamphlet The adultresses funerall day. Holinshed reported the “verie strange and notable” wonder that the imprint of Arden’s body remained where he was murdered, so that nothing living grew there—as if the wound inflicted by Alice Arden was inscribed in the earth to record for posterity the unnaturalness of a murderous wife. See Wine, ed., The Tragedy of Master Arden of Faversham, 159.Google Scholar
  35. 68.
    As the pamphlet literature made Margaret Ferne-Seede’s crime relentlessly visible, the fabled gift of invisibility conferred by fern seeds vanished. According to Elizabethan plant lore superstition, one that gathered fern seeds had the power to walk invisible. See Gladsill’s reference in 1 Henry 4: “We steal as in a castle, cocksure. We have the receipt / Of the fern seed, we walk invisible” (1.2.83); see also Clark Cumberland, Shakespeare and the Supernatural (New York: Haskell House, 1931), 36.Google Scholar
  36. 71.
    See Ann R. Jones, “Nets and Bridles: Early Modern Conduct Books and Sixteenth-Century Women’s Lyrics,” in Nancy Armstrong and Leonard Tennenhouse, ed., The Ideology of Conduct: Essays in Literature and the History of Sexuality (London: Methuen, 1987), 39–72.Google Scholar
  37. 72.
    Natalie Zemon Davis, “Women on Top,” in Society and Culture in Early Modern France (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1975), 124–51, esp. 124.Google Scholar
  38. 80.
    See Peter Stallybrass, “Patriarchal Territories: The Body Enclosed” in Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe, ed. Margaret W. Ferguson, Maureen Quilligan, and Nancy Vickers (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), 123–42.Google Scholar
  39. 81.
    See Valerie Traub, “Gender and Sexuality in Shakespeare,” in The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare, ed. Margaret de Grazia and Stanley Wells (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 129–46, esp. esp. 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 83.
    Francis Cole, A Warning for all Desperate Women by the Example of Alice Davis (London, 1628; STC 6367: 1410), 292.Google Scholar
  41. 84.
    Betty Travitsky, “Husband-Murder and Petty Treason in English Renaissance Tragedy,” 173; see also J. A. Sharpe, “Domestic Homicide in Early Modern England,” 36–38; Ruth Campbell, “Sentence of Death by Burning for Women,” Journal of Legal History 5 (1984): 44; Frances E. Dolan, “Home-Rebels and House-Traitors,” 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 86.
    Karen Cunningham, “Renaissance Execution and Marlovian Elocution: The Drama of Death,” PMLA 105 (1990), 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 87.
    Emphasis added, Henry Goodcole, The Adultresses Funerall Day (London, 1635).Google Scholar
  44. 88.
    Samuel Smith, The True Account (London: G. Croom, 1685).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pompa Banerjee 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pompa Banerjee

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations