Advertisement

The Legitimacy and Sovereignty Dilemma of African States and Governments: Problems of the Colonial Legacy

  • Cirino Hiteng Ofuho

Abstract

Over the years since African states gained their independence, scholars interested in African affairs have produced a remarkable outpouring of scholarly research on African politics, though it is tied mainly to paradigms of development.1 However, decades of preoccupation with development has yielded meagre returns, and African economies have been stagnating or regressing. Many factors have been offered to explain the apparent failure of development enterprise in Africa, and most of these explanations have been labelled as negative consequences of the colonial legacy. These include social pluralism and its centrifugal tendencies; the corruption of leaders; poor labour discipline; the lack of entrepreneurial skills; poor planning and incompetent management; inappropriate policies; the restriction of market mechanisms; low levels of technical assistance; the limited inflow of foreign capital; falling commodity prices, and unfavourable terms of trade; and low levels of saving and investment.2 These negative features have become major problems for the African continent, and a number of African scholars and Africanists alike have been quick to blame them on either the colonial superstructure or the post-colonial African political order. Thus a sustained polarisation in debate has resulted. There are scholars who have argued that the readily made assumption about the failure of development in Africa is misleading.

Keywords

International Relation African State World Politics Colonial Rule Peace Treaty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    See Naomi Chazan et al. (1992) Politics and Society in Contemporary Africa (Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner), pp. 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    These are well articulated in the seminal work of the late Professor Claude Ake, which has won admiration in the analysis of African politics. See his (1996) Democracy and Development in Africa (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution), pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Robinson expressed the vital importance of local collaboration in his ‘The Non-European Foundations of European Rule: Sketch for a Theory of Collaboration’ in R. Owen and B. Sutcliffe (eds) (1972) Studies in the Theory of Imperialism (London: Longman).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See David Robertson, (1990) The Penguin Dictionary of Politics (Harmondsworth: Penguin), p. 440.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See their seminal works: Robert H. Jackson (1990) Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press); Robert H. Jackson (1986), ‘Negative Sovereignty in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Review of International Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, October, pp. 247–64; Christopher Clapham (1996), Africa and the International System: The Politics of State Survival (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press); and Christopher Clapham (1998), ‘Degrees of Statehood’, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, April, pp. 143–57.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    See Clapham, ‘Degrees of Statehood’, p. 143.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See F. Halliday (1994) Rethinking International Relations (London: Macmillan), pp. 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    I refer here mainly to three particular books: Jean-François Bayart (1989) The State in Africa: The Politics of Belly (London: Longman); Robert H. Jackson (1990) Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press); Christopher Clapham (1996) Africa and the International System: The Politics of State Survival (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schuman, Frederick L. (1958) International Politics: The Western State System and the World Community (New York, Toronto & London: McGraw-Hill), pp. 55–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    For details on this, refer to the following literature on the origins of states: J. H. Shennan (1974) The Origins of the Modern European State, 1450–1725 (London: Hutchinson); Elman Rogers Service (1975) Origins of the State and Civilization: The Process of Cultural Evolution, (New York: Norton); Ronald Cohen and Elman R. Service (eds) (1978) Origins of the State: The Anthropology of Political Evolution (Philadelphia, Pa.: Institute of the Study of Human Issues); Ralph Pettman (1979) State and Class: A Sociology of International Affairs (New York: St Martin’s Press), pp. 108–12.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    See K. J. Holsti (1992) International Politics: A Framework for Analysis, 6th edn (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall), pp. 82–114, esp. ‘The Purposes of States: Foreign Policy Goals and Strategies’.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    See Hedley Bull (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    See Frederick L. Schuman International Politics, pp. 66–72.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Records show that by about 1500, Portugal alone had taken some 700 tons of gold out of Africa. See Hosea Jaffe (1985) A History of Africa (London: Zed Books), esp. pp. 43–64; also Georges Nzongola-Ntalaja (1937) Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Africa, (London: Institute for African Alternatives) p. 5; and Paul Cammack, David Pool and William Tordoff (1988) Third World Politics: A Comparative Introduction (London: Macmillan), pp. 13ff.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    See Basil Davidson (1994) Modern Africa: A Social and Political History (London and New York: Longman), p. 4.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The circumstances that led to the ‘scramble for Africa’ and its partition have been discussed at length in numerous published works. See, for example, A. Adu Boahen (1987) African Perspectives on Colonialism, (London: James Currey), pp. 26–57; A. Adu Boahen (ed.) (1985), General History of Africa, vol VII, (London: Longman); J. Schumpeter (1955) Imperialism and Social Classes, (Cleveland: World Publishing Company); R. E. Robinson and J. Gallaghar (1961) Africa and the Victorians (London: Macmillan); J. A. Hobson (1965) Imperialism: A Study (Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press); V. I. Lenin, (1983) Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism (Moscow: Progress Publishers); J. S. Keltie (1983), The Partition of Africa (London: E. Stanford); G. N. Uzoigwe (1974) Britain and the Conquest of Africa (Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press); B. Sutcliffe and R. Owen (eds) (1972) Studies in the Theory of Imperialism (London: Longman); Walter Rodney (1972), How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Publishing House); and Claude Ake, A Political Economy of Africa, pp. 26–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    In these two useful major publications on the history of Africa, various scholars have contributed massive accounts of events. See The Cambridge History of Africa, 8 vols, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1976; and UNESCO General History of Africa, 8 vols, (Paris: UNESCO), 1985.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    See Adu Boahen African Perspectives on Colonialism, op. cit., pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    See Robert O. Collins (1971) Europeans in Africa (New York: Alfred A. Knopf), pp. 71–7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    These are dealt with well in a number of scholarly sources such as Raymond F. Betts (ed.) (1972) The Scramble for Africa: Causes and Dimensions of Empire (London: D. C. Heath); G. N. Sanderson (1986) ‘The European Partition of Africa: Origins and Dynamics’ in J. D. Fage and R. Oliver (eds) The Cambridge History of Africa (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press) pp. 96–158; G. N. Sanderson (1974) ‘The European Partition of Africa: Coincidence or Conjuncture?’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, vol. 3, no. 1, October; and a number of articles in both the Cambridge and the UNESCO histories of Africa series cited in note 17 above.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    See Robert O. Collins, Europeans in Africa, p. 71.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    According to Claude Ake, Democracy and Development in Africa, p. 29, within a few years after King Leopold II had triggered off the scramble for Africa in 1876, the continent was divided among the European powers and subsequently colonised. See also the chapter on ‘Central Africa and Europe’ by Thomas Pakenham (1991) The Scramble for Africa: 1876–1912 (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson), pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    See M. E., Chamberlain (1974) The Scramble for Africa (London: Longman), pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    See Robin Hallet (ed.) (1964) Records of the African Association, 1788–1831, (London: Nelson).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    In ‘Saving the Bey’ and ‘Saving the Khedive’, see Thomas Pakenham, The Scramble for Africa, pp. 109–122 and 123–140.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    See Robert O. Collins Europeans in Africa, p. 72.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ibid., pp. 99–137.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    See H. S. Wilson (1977) The Imperial Experience in Sub-Saharan Africa Since 1870 (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 24–30; and A. Nutting (1994) The Scramble for Africa: The Great Trek to the Boer War (London: Constable 1994).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A counter-argument has been advanced that, while African-based imperialism took place, that process was already concluded by the time the European partition began, and to ignore that fact would be to discount significant elements of European purposiveness, premeditation and aggression. See H. S. Wilson, The Imperial Experience in Sub-Saharan Africa, p. 50; and Makumi Mwagiru (1994) The International Management of Internal Conflict in Africa: The Uganda Mediation (PhD thesis, University of Kent at Canterbury 1994), pp. 99–100.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    See A. Adu Boahen African Perspectives on Colonialism, pp. 1–26; Dorothy Dodge (1996) African Politics in Perspective (Princeton, NJ: Van Nastrand) pp. 15ff; and Paul Cammack, David Pool and William Tordoff, Third-World Politics, pp. 12–20.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    See Albert Adu Boahen (1990) ‘Africa and the Colonial Challenge’ in A. Adu Boahen (ed.), UNESCO General History of Africa, vol. VII, ‘Africa Under Colonial Domination 1880–1935’, (London: James Currey), p. 1.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    See Thomas Pakenham The Scramble for Africa, p. xv.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    See A. I. Asiwaju, chapter presented at the Nigerian National Open University, quoted by A. Adu Boahen (1937) African Perspectives of Colonialism, p. 28.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    See Z. Ergas (ed.) The African State in Transition (Macmillan); and Adrian Leftwich (1993) ‘States of Underdevelopment: The Third World State in Theoretical Perspective’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 55–74 and 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    I have no intention of discussing Westphalia here, but the impact of its legacy has been mentioned by a number of scholars. See, in particular, Ali A. Mazrui and Michael Tidy (1934), Nationalism and New States in Africa (Nairobi and London: Heinemann) pp. 373–5; Frederick L. Schuman, International Politics, and William C. Olson, International relations then and now: Origins and trends in Interpretations (London: Routledge) and A. J. R. Groom (1991); also K. J. Holsti, International Politics, pp. 15–44.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    See Basil Davidson, Modern Africa, p. 5.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    See John D. Hargreaves ‘The Berlin Conference, West African Boundaries, and the Eventual Partition’ in S. Forster, W. J. Mommsen and R. Robinson (1988) Bismark, Europe and Africa: the Berlin Africa Conference 1884–1885 and the onset of partition (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 313–14.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    See Robert H. Jackson, Quasi-States, and Stephen Wright (1992), ‘The Foreign Policy of Africa’, in Roy C. Macridis (ed.), Foreign Policy in World Politics (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall), pp. 330–56 and 332.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    See, for example, Mohammed Ayoob (1995) The Third World Security Predicament: State-Making, Regional Conflict, and the System International (Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    See Hedley Bull and Adam Watson, The Expansion of International Society, (Oxford: Clarendon), 1984.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    See Ali A. Mazrui (1983) ‘Africa: The Political Culture of Nationhood and the Political Economy of the State’, Millennium, vol. 12, no. 3, Autumn, pp. 201–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    See Raymond Duvall and John R. Freeman (1981) ‘The State and Dependent Capitalism’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 106; and David Robertson, The Penguin Dictionary of Politics, p. 444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    See Hedley Bull (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan), p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    See Kenneth Waltz (1959) Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 172–8.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    See F. S. Northedge (1976) The International Political System (London: Faber & Faber), p. 15.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    See Allen James (1986) Sovereign Statehood (London: Allen & Unwin), p. 13.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    See Theda Skocpol (1979) States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 29; and Charles Tilly (1985) ‘War making and State Making as Organised Crime’ in Peter Evans et al. (eds) Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press); and in Charles Tilly (ed.) (1975) The Formation of National States in Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    See M. O. Hardimon (1994), Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    See M. Salamonio (1955) De Principatu (Milan: Giuffre Editore), quoted by Michael Lesnoff (1986), Social Contract: Issues in Political Theory (London: Macmillan), pp. 26–7.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    See Walker Connor (1972) ‘Nation-Building or Nation-Destroying?’, World Politics, vol. 24, April, pp. 319–55; and Walker Connor (1978) ‘A Nation is a Nation, is a State, is an Ethnic Group, is a…’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 1, no. 4, October, pp. 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    See M. G. Smith (1971) ‘Institutional and Political Conditions of Pluralism’, in L. Kuper and M. G. Smith (eds), Pluralism in Africa (Los Angeles: University of California Press), p. 32.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    See J. Isawa, Elaigwu (1993) ‘Nation-Building and Changing Political Structures’, in Ali A. Mazrui and C. Wondji (eds), UNESCO General History of Africa, vol. III: Africa Since 1935, (Oxford: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    See the works of Mwalimu Julius Nyerere. Mzee Jomo Kenyatta, Harambee: The Prime Minister of Kenya’s Speeches, 1963–1964, also published by Oxford University Press (n. d.), is a better illustration of post-colonial nation-building in Africa.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mostafa Rejai and Cynthia Enloe, ‘Nation-States and State-Nations’, International Studies Quarterly’, Vol. 13, No.2, June 1969, p. 140; Connor, Walker, ‘A Nation is a Nation, is a State, is an Ethnic Group, is a…’, p. 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    A wide range of literature associates the concept of the state with the political analysis of Africa. See Patrick Chabal (1992) Power in Africa, pp. 68–81; Naomi Chazan et al., Politics and Society in contemporary Africa, pp. 38–46; Jean-François Bayart (1989) L’Etat en Afrique (Paris: Fayard); J. Lonsdale (1981) ‘States and Social Processes in Africa’, African Studies Review, vol. 24, no. 2–3; these two offer most useful discussions of state in Africa. And for a review of the concept of the state, see J. P. Nettl (1968), ‘The State as a Conceptual Variable’, World Politics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 559–92; Stephen D. Krasner (1984), ‘Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics’, Comparative Politics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 223–45; Peter Anyang’ Gnawing’ (1983), ‘The Economic Foundations of the State in Contemporary Africa’, Presence Africaine, No. 127/128, p. 195; Claude Ake (1981), A Political Economy of Africa (London: Longman); Peter Evans et al. (eds) (1985) Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press); Theda Skocpol (1980) The State and Social Revolutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press); and more.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    See Z. Ergas (ed.), The African State.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    See Aristide Zolberg (1966) Creating Political Order: The Party States of West Africa (Chicago: Rand McNally); G. Roth (1968) ‘Personal Rulership, Patrimonialism and Empire-Building in the New States’, World Politics, vol. 20, pp. 195–206; and R. Sandbrook (1985) The Politics of Africa’s Economic Stagnation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    See J. F. Medard (1982) ‘The Underdeveloped State in Tropical Africa: Political Clientism or Neopatrimonialism’, in Christopher Clapham (ed.), Private Patronage and Public Power (London: Pinter).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    See R. A. Joseph (1983) ‘Class, State and Prebendal Politics in Nigeria’, Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, vol. 21, pp. 21–38; R. A. Joseph (1987) Democracy and Prebendal Politics in Nigeria: (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    See T. M. Callaghy ‘The State as a Tame Leviathan: The Patrimonial Administrative State in Africa’ in Z. Ergas (ed.), The African State in Transition, pp. 87–116.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    See again R. Sandbrook, Politics of Africa’s Economic Stagnation, pp. 319–32.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    See Robert H. Jackson and C. G. Roseberg (1986), ‘Why Africa’s Weak States Persist’, in A. Kohli (ed.), The State and Development in the Third World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 259–82; and Robert H. Jackson, Quasi-States.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    It should be noted from now onwards that in African politics, the term ‘nation’ is often synonymously used to mean ‘state’.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    See Patrick Chabal (1992) Power in Africa, (London: Macmillan), pp. 74–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    See also Ronald Robinson (1972) ‘Non-European Foundations of European Imperialism’, in R. Owen and B. Sutcliffe (eds), Studies in the Theories of Imperialism (London: Longman).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    See J. Gallagher et al. (1973) Locality, Province and Nation: Essays on Indian Politics, 1870 to 1940 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Quoted from G. Kitching (1980) Class and Economic Change in Kenya (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    For an argument on the overdevelopment of the colony, see Hamza Alavi (1972) ‘The State in Post-Colonial Societies: Pakistan and Bangladesh’, New Left Review, vol. 74, p. 61.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    For a better example, see J. Iliffe (1979) A Modern History of Tanganyika (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    See Patrick Chabal (ed.) (1986) Political Domination in Africa (Cambridge University Press), p. 146.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    See Chabal part IV, pp. 200–16.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ibid., pp. 204–5.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    See John, Darwin (1996) ‘Africa and World Politics Since 1945: Theories of Decolonisation’, in Ngaire Woods (ed.), Explaining International Relations Since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 199–218 and 201–2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cirino Hiteng Ofuho

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations