Advertisement

Elaine Showalter (1941–) from “The Female Tradition,” A Literature of Their Own (1977)

  • Lee Morrissey

Abstract

English women writers have never suffered from the lack of a reading audience, nor have they wanted for attention from scholars and critics. Yet we have never been sure what unites them as women, or, indeed, whether they share a common heritage connected to their womanhood at all. Writing about female creativity in The Subjection of Women (1869), John Stuart Mill argued that women would have a hard struggle to overcome the influence of male literary tradition, and to create an original, primary, and independent art. “If women lived in a different country from men,” Mill thought, “and had never read any of their writings, they would have a literature of their own.” Instead, he reasoned, they would always be imitators and never innovators. Paradoxically, Mill would never have raised this point had women not already claimed a very important literary place. To many of his contemporaries (and to many of ours), it seemed that the nineteenth century was the Age of the Female Novelist. With such stellar examples as Jane Austen, Charlotte Brontë, and George Eliot, the question of women’s aptitude for fiction, at any rate, had been answered. But a larger question was whether women, excluded by custom and education from achieving distinction in poetry, history, or drama, had, in defining their literary culture in the novel, simply appropriated another masculine genre. Both George Henry Lewes and Mill, spokesmen for women’s rights and Victorian liberalism in general, felt that, like the Romans in the shadow of Greece, women were overshadowed by male cultural imperialism: “If women’s literature is destined to have a different collective character from that of men,” wrote Mill, “much longer time is necessary than has yet elapsed before it can emancipate itself from the influence of accepted models, and guide itself by its own impulses.”1

Keywords

Literary History Woman Writer Collective Character Time Literary Supplement Female Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 5.
    Mary Ellmann, Thinking About Women (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968), pp. 28–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 8.
    Linda Nochlin, “Why Are There No Great Women Artists?” in Woman in Sexist Society ed. Vivian Gornick and Barbara K. Moran, (New York: Basic Books, 1971), pp. 344–346.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lee Morrissey 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee Morrissey

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations