Memory and Recognition in Henryson’s Testament of Cresseid
Chaucer’s poetry continually raises the question of how poetic delight might have moral consequences. But despite his many explorations of the relationship between “sentence” and “solas,” he repeatedly depicts exemplarity per se as a limited conceptual model. This is most striking in the Physician’s Tale, where, as we saw in chapter 4, the narrator makes Virginia exemplary by killing her off. The Physician rejects natural bodily mutability—Virginia’s growth into a woman—which he associates with the unpredictable and multiplicitous effects offabula. His laborious efforts reveal that, for Chaucer, moral ideals provide too fixed a way of understanding human action, or of representing that action in poetry. When, in response, the pilgrims desire “some moral thyng” from the Pardoner, he demonstrates the compelling moral logic that equates desire with death; as we saw in chapter 5, the Pardoner’s performance turns that logic against his desiring audience. Elsewhere, in the Clerk’s and Man of Law’s Tales and the Legends of Good Women, Chaucer repeatedly examines the costs of imposing abstract moral rules, especially upon women.1 These examinations occur in different formal registers, invoking a range of discourses—the hagiography of the Man of Law, the domestic advisory discourse of the Clerk’s Tale, the courtly love of the Legends. In each context, female virtue is achieved through visible narrative manipulations, hinting at how feminine will may exceed available parameters.
KeywordsMoral Judgment Love Affair Exemplary Moral Love Story Exemplary Figure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.David Wallace, Chaucerian Polity (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997), ch. 7.Google Scholar
- 11.Karla Taylor, “Inferno 5 and Troilus and Criseyde Revisited,” in Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde: “Subgit to alkpoesye”: Essays in Criticism, ed. R. A. Shoaf with Catherine S. Cox (Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, State University of New York, 1992), pp. 239–56.Google Scholar
- 12.Carolyn Dinshaw, Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989).Google Scholar
- 14.A. C. Spearing, Criticism and Medieval Poetry (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1972), pp. 135–92.Google Scholar
- 18.Jane Adamson, “The Curious Incident of the Recognition in Henryso’ ‘The Testament of Cresseid,’” Parergon 27 (1980): 17–25.Google Scholar
- 20.John Ganim, Style and Consciousness in Middle English Narrative (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983), pp. 123–41.Google Scholar
- 33.Alice Nitecki, “‘Fenyeit of the New’: Authority in The Testament of Cresseid,” Journal of Narrative Technique 15 (1985): 120–32.Google Scholar
- 35.Marshall W. Stearns, Robert Henryson (New York: AMS Press, 1966), pp. 98–105.Google Scholar
- 46.Melvin Storm, “The Intertextual Cresseida: Chaucer’s Henryson or Henryso’ Chaucer?” Studies in Scottish Literature 28 (1993): 105–22.Google Scholar
- 48.Stephanie Trigg, Congenial Souls: Reading Chaucer from Medieval to Postmodern (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002).Google Scholar