• Anne McClanan
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)


These chapters only begin a discussion about the representation of imperial women in this period of transition from Roman to medieval institutions. Rather than teaching eternal truths that dictated the lives of early Byzantine imperial women, each study yielded its own lessons, and the singularity of each woman’s historical role and portrayal belies attempts to generalize. The institutional context of these images illuminates how generic forms were used and manipulated in the visual culture of the time.


Imperial Image Sixth Century Visual Culture Eternal Truth Byzantine Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Liz James offers a very useful table of individual empresses and the surviving sources for their titles, Liz James, Empresses and Power in Early Byzantium (London: Leicester University Press, 2001), pp. 120–22.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexander Kazhdan and Michael McCormick, “The Social World of the Byzantine Court,” in Byzantine Court Culture from 829 to 1204 (Washington, D. C.: Dumbarton Oaks, 1997), p. 170 [167–97].Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Ernst Kitzinger, “Artistic Patronage in Early Byzantium,” in Committenti e produzione artistico-letteraria nell’alto medioevo occidentale (Spoleto: Presso la sede del centro, 1992), p. 43 [33–55].Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Sister Benedicta Ward, Harlots of the Desert: A Study of Repentance in Early Byzantine Monastic Sources (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1987).Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Michael McCormick, “Emperors,” in The Byzantines, ed. Guglielmo Cavallo (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1997), p. 232 [230–54].Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Alexander Kazhdan, “Women at Home,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 52 (1998): 5 [1–17].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 15.
    Arjun Appadurai, The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986), p. 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 17.
    David H. Wright, “The Shape of the Seventh Century in Byzantine Art,” First Annual Byzantine Studies Conference Abstracts of Papers (1975): 24–25 [9–28].Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    Martin Jay, “Scopic Regimes of Modernity,” Vision and Visuality, ed. Hal Foster (Seattle: Bay Press, 1988), p. 12 [3–28].Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    James Trilling, “The Image Not Made by Hands and the Byzantine Way of Seeing,” in The Holy Face and the Paradox of Representation, ed. Herbert L. Kessler and Gerhard Wolf (Bologna: Nuova Alfa Editoriale, 1998), pp. 109–27;Google Scholar
  11. R. L. Gordon, “The Real and the Imaginary: Production and Religion in the Graeco-Roman World,” Art History 2. 1 (1979): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 21.
    Henry Maguire, “Originality in Byzantine Art Criticism,” in Originality in Byzantine Literature, Art and Music, ed. A. R. Littlewood (Oxford: Oxbow, 1995), pp. 101–14.Google Scholar
  13. 23.
    Leo Braudy, The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and Its History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), p. 41 n7.Google Scholar
  14. 27.
    Nevra Necipoglu, “Byzantine Women,” in Woman in Anatolia: 9000Years of the Anatolian Woman, ed. Günsel Renda (Istanbul: Turkish Republic Ministry of Culture, 1993), p. 127 [125–31].Google Scholar
  15. 29.
    Liz James and Barbara Hill, “Women and Politics in the Byzantine Empire: Imperial Women,” in Women in Medieval Western European Culture, ed. Linda E. Mitchell (New York: Garland, 1999), p. 163 n4 [157–78].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anne McClanan 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne McClanan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations