• Anne McClanan
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)


The emperor and empress stood at the apex of the Byzantine state. Even when their very persons were unrecognizable to the functionaries who circled the periphery of the court, the imperial image was replicated endlessly throughout the Empire in their stead. Although Liutprand’s anecdote concerns an emperor, we will see that the same conundrums apply to empresses when we look earlier in Byzantine history at the imperial women of the late fifth and sixth centuries. At once accessible and remote, their representations circulated everywhere at the same time that the individuals receded into the infinity of the concept of divine rule. To their medieval audience, the multiple meanings of imperial images rested on a foundation of visual, political, and cultural traditions that buttressed the institutions of authority. The early Byzantine period presents the chance to study the nascent form of these practices as we see the transition from Roman imperial norms to new paradigms. The role and representation of imperial women demonstrates how those traditions diverged and coincided on the basis of gender.


Textual Source Sixth Century Visual Culture Female Court Byzantine Period 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    Valentin Groebner, “Describing the Person, Reading the Signs in Late Medieval and Renaissance Europe: Identity Papers, Vested Figures, and the Limits of Identification,” in Documenting Individual Identity: The Development of State Practices in the Modern World, ed. Jane Caplan and John Torpey (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001), pp. 25–26 [15–27].Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Elizabeth Bartman, Portraits of Livia: Imaging Imperial Woman in Augustan Rome (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 13. Spatharakis’ anachronistic criteria for a Byzantine portrait is basically that it be an image of a historical individual made during his or her lifetime.Google Scholar
  3. Iohannis Spatharakis, The Portrait in Byzantine Illuminated Manuscripts (Leiden: Brill, 1976), p. 3.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Susan E.Wood, Imperial Women,A Study in Public Images, 40 B.C.-A.D. 68 (Leiden: Brill, 1999), p. 46.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Lynda Garland, Byzantine Empresses: Women and Power in Byzantium A.D. 527–1204 (London: Routledge, 1999), p. 21. Reviewed by author, The Medieval Review, on-line, 5 July 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Susan Fischler, “Social Stereotypes and Historical Analysis:The Case of Imperial Women at Rome,” in Women in Ancient Societies: An Illusion of the Night, ed. Léonie Archer, Susan Fischler, and Maria Wyke (New York: Routledge, 1994), pp. 127–29 [115–33].Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    Ernst H. Kantorowicz, The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    Angeliki E. Laiou, “The Role of Women in Byzantine Society,” Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 31. 1 (1981): 233 [233–60].Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    André Grabar, L’empereur dans l’art byzantin (1936; repr. London: Variorum Reprints, 1971)Google Scholar
  10. S. Lampros, Asvxopa Bv’avrtvciiv Avrozparôpwv (Athens: Eleftherodakis, 1930).Google Scholar
  11. 20.
    Richard Delbrueck, “Portraets byzantinischer Kaiserinnen,” Mitteilungen des kaiserlich deutschen archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung 28 (1913): 310–52.Google Scholar
  12. 22.
    Liz James, Empresses and Power in Early Byzantium (London: Leicester University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  13. 23.
    Henry Maguire, “Style and Ideology in Byzantine Imperial Art,” Gesta 28 (1989): 217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 24.
    Leslie Brubaker, “Art and Byzantine Identity: Saints, Portraits, and the Lincoln College Typikon,” in Byzantium: Image, Identity, Influence, XIX International Congress of Byzantine Studies, Major Papers (Copenhagen: Eventus Publishers, 1996), pp. 51–59.Google Scholar
  15. 25.
    Susan Bordo, “Feminism, Postmodernism, and Gender-Scepticism,” in Feminism/ Postmodernism, ed. N. Nicholson (New York: Routledge, 1990), p. 135 [133–56].Google Scholar
  16. 27.
    Gillian Clark, Women in Late Antiquity: Pagan and Christian Life-styles (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  17. 28.
    Irmgard Hutter, “Das Bild der Frau in der byzantinischen Kunst,” in BTZANTIOE: Festschrift für Herbert Hunger, ed. W. Hörander, et al. (Vienna: Ernst Becvar, 1984), pp. 163–70.Google Scholar
  18. 29.
    Liz James, ed. Women, Men, and Eunuchs: Gender in Byzantium (New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
  19. 30.
    Judith Herrin, Women in Purple: Rulers of Medieval Byzantium (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2001)Google Scholar
  20. Barbara Hill, Imperial Women in Byzantium, 1025–1204: power, patronage, and ideology (New York: Longman, 1999).Google Scholar
  21. 32.
    Joan Wallach Scott, “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis,” in Feminism and History, ed. Joan Wallach Scott (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), p. 156. This often-quoted essay originally appeared in American Historical Review 91.5 (1986): 1053–75.Google Scholar
  22. 33.
    Jill Dubisch, In a Different Place: Pilgrimage, Gender and Politics at a Greek Island Shrine (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), p. 11.Google Scholar
  23. 34.
    Lucia Fischer-Papp, Evita Peron: Empress Theodora Reincarnated (Rockford, IL: Northwoods Press, 1983), p. 304.Google Scholar
  24. 36.
    Gilbert Dagron, Empereur et prêtre: étude sur le “césaropapisme” byzantin (Paris: Gallimard, 1996), pp. 129–38.Google Scholar
  25. 37.
    St. Maslev, “Die staatsrechtliche Stellung der byzantinischen Kaiserinnen,” Byzantinoslavica 27 (1966): 308–43.Google Scholar
  26. 48.
    Eve D’Ambra, Private Lives, Imperial Virtues: The Frieze of the Forum Transitorium in Rome (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), pp. 100–103.Google Scholar
  27. 50.
    Steven Runcimann, “The Empress Irene the Athenian,” in Medieval Women, ed. Derek Baker (Oxford: Blackwell, 1978), p. 117 [101–18].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anne McClanan 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne McClanan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations