Skip to main content

Apartheid and Health Professional Accountability: Violations of the Reproductive Rights of Women

  • Chapter
Engendering Human Rights

Part of the book series: Comparative Feminist Studies ((CFS))

  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

Examining the work of scientists and health professionals during colonial and apartheid South Africa reveals complex interconnections between science, gender, “race,”1 and nation-building. We explore the complicity of health professionals in the abuse of the reproductive rights of South African women through participation in a system that constructed women primarily as reproductive bodies and manipulated their reproduction for oppressive political purposes. If a culture of respect for human rights is to supplant one of complicity with abuse, this history must first be acknowledged, accountability accepted, and systematic mechanisms put in place to address training, monitoring for human rights abuses and transformation in institutions and organizations. While challenging and perhaps time-consuming to tackle issues of the past, it is imperative to undertake such critical self-study so that current attempts to transform health services in post-apartheid South Africa will be successful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Baldwin-Ragaven, L., J. de Gruchy, S. Lewin, and L. London. 1998. “Restoring the Honour of Our Profession.” South African Medical journal 88: 969–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin-Ragaven, L., J. de Gruchy, and L. London. 1999. An Ambulance of the Wrong Colour: Health Professionals, Human Rights and Ethics in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, K. 2002. “DIY Abortions: State Abortion Clinics.” Carte Blanche [Video]. South Africa: MNET (June 23).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B.B. 1987. “Facing the ‘Black Peril’: The Politics of Population Control in South Africa.” Journal of Southern African Studies 13: 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission. 1932. The Poor White Problem in South Africa: Report of the Carnegie Commission. Stellenbosch, South Africa: Pro ecclesia-drukkery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, S. 1994. Population and Reproductive Rights: Feminist Perspectives from the South. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gruchy, J., L. London, L. Baldwin-Ragaven, S. Lewin, and the Health and Human Rights Project Support Group. 1998. “The Difficult Road to Truth and Reconciliation–The Health Sector Takes Its First Steps.” South African Medical Journal 88: 975–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Welfare. N.D. How the Farmer’s Wife Can Promote Family Planning [Pamphlet in Afrikaans, translated by author de Gruchy]. South Africa: Department of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubow, S. 1995. Scientific Racism in Modern South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G., T. De Wet, C. Ijsselmuiden, and L. Richter. 1996. “Desegregating Health Statistics and Health Research in South Africa.” South African Medical Journal 86: 1257–1262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, W. 2001. “The Poison Keeper.” The New Yorker (January): 58–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Moreno, C. 2002. “Dilemmas and Opportunities for an Appropriate Health-Service Response to Violence against Women.” Lancet 359: 1509–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health and Human Rights Project (HHRP). 1997. The Final Submission of the HHRP to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Cape Town: Health and Human Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 1997. South Africa: Violence against Women and the Medico-Legal System 9 (4A): 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, R., Z. Mvo, and N. Abrahams. 1997. “Violence Against Patients in a Cape Town Obstetric Unit.” Urbanization and Health Newsletter (MRC) 34: 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser Network. 2002. “European Union to Donate Funds to International Family Planning Programs to ‘Fill the Gap’ Left by Withdrawal of US Funding.” Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report, July 25 [accessed September 2, 2002], http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/

  • Kim, J. and M. Motsei. 2002. “ ‘Women Enjoy Punishment’: Attitudes and Experiences of Gender-based Violence among PHC Nurses in Rural South Africa.” Social Science and Medicine 54: 1243–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausen, S. 1998. The Race Welfare Society: Eugenics and Birth Control in Johannesburg, 1930 to 1944. Sussex, UK: University of Sussex Centre for Southern African Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klugman, B. 1990. “The Politics of Contraception in South Africa.” Women’s Studies International Forum 13: 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klugman, B. 1993. “Balancing Means and Ends–Population Policy in South Africa.” Reproductive Health Matters 1: 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klugman, B. 1998. “Dear Friends” [Editorial], Women’s Health News and Views: Newsletter of the Women’s Health Project 27: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J., L. Gostin, S. Gruskin, T. Brennan, Z. Lazzarini, and H. Fineberg. 1994. “Health and Human Rights.” Health and Human Rights 1: 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the President. 2004. Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 1995, [accessed June 5, 2004], http://www.info.gov.za/gazette/acts/1995/a34-95.htm

  • Penn-Kekana, L. 2000. “RHRU: Termination of Pregnancy Services Survey.” In Report on the Public Hearings on the Implementation of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act (1996), June 6–8, 2000. South Africa: The Reproductive Rights Alliance and the National Portfolio Committee on Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapid, E.V. 1998. Letter to the editor, Asijiki 4 (March): 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, H. 1991. “Women and Reproductive Rights.” In Putting Women on the Agenda, ed. S. Bazilli, 209–216. Johannesburg: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, H. 1995. “Contraception: More Complex than Just a Method?” Agenda 27: 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sai, F., H. Rees, and S. McGarry. 1993. Reproductive Health and Family Planning Consultancy: National Review and Recommendations, Final Report. Johannesburg: Commission of the European Communities, Special Program for South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Andrew B. 1997. “Modern Eugenics” [Letter]. Time International Magazine (November 3): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • South African Press Association. 2002. “Tutu Slams Basson Verdict.” Mail and Guardian Online (April 12) [accessed October 14, 2002], http://www.mg.co.za/ll.jsp

  • Stepan, N. 1991. The Hour of Eugenics. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. 1996. Cape Town: Government Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornycroft, P. and S. Sole. 1998. “SADF Used Chimps in Project to Curb Black Fertility.” The Sunday Independent (April 19): 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasevski, K. 1994. Human Rights in Population Policies: A Study for SIDA. Lund, Sweden: Swedish International Development Authority (SIDA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 1998. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report, volumes 1–5. Cape Town: Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wa Afrika, M. 1998. “Schoolgirl Dies after Illegal Abortion.” The Sunday Times Online (September 6) [accessed October 14, 2002], http://www.suntimes.co.za/1998/09/06/news/gauteng/njhb21.htm

  • Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. Gender and Nation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwi, A. 1987. “The Political Abuse of Medicine and the Challenge of Opposing It.” Social Science and Medicine 25: 649–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Obioma Nnaemeka and Joy Ngozi Ezeilo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Gruchy, J., Baldwin-Ragaven, L. (2005). Apartheid and Health Professional Accountability: Violations of the Reproductive Rights of Women. In: Engendering Human Rights. Comparative Feminist Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04382-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics