Conceptualizing Community: Implications for Policymaking in a Cyberage

  • Concetta M. Stewart
  • Mairi Innes Pileggi


Discussion surrounding the development of telecommunications policy has typically been framed in terms of communities of access and of interest. Indeed, communication technologies are often understood as a supplement to face-to-face communication, which is empirically understood as the basis for social interaction and the establishment of community (see McLuhan and Fiore, 1967). The Internet is no exception. There are, however, various and often competing definitions of “community” with respect to the Internet, thereby raising serious questions for both public policy and political activity, including but not limited to the following: What does it mean to be a citizen in this new cyberage? (See Jones, 1995; 1997.) With what rights is a cyber-citizen endowed? (See Etzioni, 2004.) What is public space? (See Stewart, Gil-Egui and Pileggi, 2004a; 2004b). What is communal? (See Fulk, et al., 1996).


Power Relation Smart Card Collective Intelligence Universal Service Telecommunication Infrastructure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bar, F. (1987). Information and communications technologies for economic development. BRIE working paper no. 25. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, University of California.Google Scholar
  2. Braman, S. (1995). Horizons of the state: Information policy and power. Journal of Communication. Vol. 45, no. 4:4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —. (1999). Policy, discourse, organization, culture. ICA Newsletter. Vol. 27, no. 1:3–4.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman, G. (1999). Telecom reins belong in hands of local citizens. Los Angeles Times, “Digital Nation” column, June 21. Scholar
  5. —. (2004). Shaping technology for the “Good Life”: The technological imperative versus the social imperative, in Shaping the network society: the new role of civil society in cyberspace. D. Schuler and P. Day, eds., pp. 43–66. Cambridge Ma: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Day, P. (2001). Participating in the information society: Community development and social inclusion, in Community informatics: Shaping computer-mediated social relations. L. Keeble and B. Loader, eds., pp. 305–323. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Etizioni, A. (2004). On virtual, democratic communities, in Community in the digital age: Philosophy and practice. A. Feenberg and D. Barney, eds., pp. 225–238. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  9. Fulk, J., A. Flanagin, M. Kalman, P. Monge, and T. Ryan. (1996). Connective and communal public good in interactive systems. Communication Theory. Vol. 6, no. 1:60–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gillespie, A. E.. and H. Williams. (1988). Telecommunications and the reconstruction of regional comparative advantage. Environmental Planning. Vol. 20:1311–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gore, A. (1994). Text of speech delivered by U.S. Vice President Gore to the World Telecommunication Development Conference, Buenos Aires, March 21.
  12. —. (1998a). Text of speech by U.S. Vice President Gore to the 15th International ITU conference, Minneapolis, MN, October 12.
  13. —. (1996). Basic Principles for building an Information Society. Global Issues. USIA Eletronic Journals. Vol. 1, no. 12.
  14. Jones, S. (1995). Cybersociety. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. —. (1997). Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Kahin, B. and C. Nesson. (1998). Borders in Cyberspace, p. vii. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kahn, R. and V. Cerf. (2000). Email posted September 28, 2000.
  18. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. LaTour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. —. (1997). “There is no information, only transformation”: An interview with Bruno Latour. By Geert Lovink and Pit Schultz.–9709/msg00006.html.Google Scholar
  21. Lenert, E. (1998). A communication theory perspective on telecommunications policy. Journal of Communication. Vol. 48, no. 4:3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mansell, R. (1993). The new telecommunications: A political economy of network evolution. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. McChesney, R. (1998). The political economy of global communication, in Capitalism and the Information Age. R. McChesney, E. M. Wood, and J. B. Foster, eds., pp. 1–26. New York: The Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  25. —. (2000). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  26. McLuhan, M. and Q. Fiore. (1967). The medium is the massage. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  27. Miles, S. (1998). Charting a course to “safe change.” Wirednews, February 2. Scholar
  28. Napoli, L. (1998). The latest Internet buzzword: Community. New York Times [Cybertimes]. Scholar
  29. Panzar, J. (1990). The economics of telecommunications infrastructure enhancement, Appendix C in the comments of telephone and data systems, Inc.—Notice of Inquiry: Comprehensive study of the domestic telecommunications infrastructure (Docket No. 91296-9296). Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration.Google Scholar
  30. Pileggi, M. (1998). No sex, no drugs, just hardcore rock: Using Bourdieu to understand straight-edge kids and their practices. Unpublished dissertation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.Google Scholar
  31. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  32. Robay, M. (1998). Global communication policy and the realisation of human rights. Journal of International Communication. Vol. 5, no. 1–2:83–104.Google Scholar
  33. Sawhney, H. (1996), Information superhighway: Metaphors as midwives. Media, Culture & Society. Vol. 2, no. 18:291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schiller, H. I. (1982). Who Knows: Information in the Age of the Fortune 500. Norwood, NJ: ABLEX Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  35. Spich, R. (1995). Globalization folklore: Problem of myth and ideology in the discourse of globalization. Journal of Organizational Change Management. Vol. 8, no. 4:6–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stewart, C., G. Gil-Egui, and M. Pileggi. (2004a). Applying the public trust doctrine to the governance of content-related internet resources. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies. Vol. 66, no. 6:497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. —. (2004b). The city park as a public good reference for Internet policymaking. Information, Communication & Society. Vol. 7, no. 3.Google Scholar
  38. Stone, A.R. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wiggins, R. (2000). Al Gore and the creation of the Internet. First Monday, Issue 5.10. Scholar

Copyright information

© Linda K. Fuller 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Concetta M. Stewart
  • Mairi Innes Pileggi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations