Call Me Impure: Myths and Paradigms of Participatory Communication
If there is something I have learned during 25 years of working and reflecting on participatory communication experiences, it is that there is no blueprint or perfect model, as each experience is unique. We can group participatory communication experiences according to some of their features, but they hardly respond to the same common features, except in general. We can group them, for example, according to the media tool they use (i.e., video, radio, print, Internet), but even this is subject to a second review, as none of them strictly uses one tool. We might try the subject theme that is predominant (i.e., reproductive health, women’s empowerment, human rights, rural development, environment, and conservation) but this is also a very fragile classification.
KeywordsSocial Change Community Medium Radio Station Communication Experience Participatory Communication
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alarcón, H. B. (1978). Educacion fundamental integral: Teoria y aplicacion en el caso de ACPO. Bogota: Accion Cultural Popular.Google Scholar
- Espinoza, J. G. (1969). Por un cine imperfecto. Madrid: EICTV.Google Scholar
- Gumucio Dagron, A. (2001). Making waves: Stories of participatory communication for social change. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.Google Scholar
- Gumucio Dagron, A. and L. Cajías, eds. (1989). Las radios mineras de Bolivia. La Paz: CIMC-UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Gumucio Dagron, A. and T. Tufte, eds. (2006). Communication for social change anthology: Historical and contemporary readings. South Orange, NJ: Communication for Social Change Consortium.Google Scholar