Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Public Law

  • Chapter
Integrating Socio-Legal Studies into the Law Curriculum

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies ((PSLS))

Abstract

One of the challenges of writing about the integration of socio-legal studies into the teaching of the law curriculum is that, as a number of commentators have noted, the definition of ‘socio-legal’ can be quite hard to pin down (e.g. Harris, 1983; Galligan, 1996; Cotterrell, 2006). The history of socio-legal studies in the UK, perhaps because of its predominant development within the law schools (Thomas, 1997), is best understood as a reaction against the approach to the study of law which had dominated legal scholarship up to the 1960s. In this sense, the socio-legal movement in the UK has a clearer negative identity than a positive one: it is easier to identify what socio-legal is not, rather than what it is. The broad range of disciplinary and theoretical perspectives which can now be accommodated under the banner ‘socio-legal’ testifies to this. The strapline of the Socio-Legal Studies Association, for example (‘where law meets the social sciences and humanities’), is notably inclusive. And the approach to law against which socio-legal defines itself is narrow doctrinal analysis: the exposition of positive law, isolated from its economic, political and cultural contexts. Cotterrell, for example, reflecting on his own experiences, locates the attraction of a socio-legal approach in:

a set of new perspectives on law to allow a breakout from the claustrophobic world of legal scholarship and education, as previously encountered. Most legal study … at the end of the 1960s seemed to focus on technicality as an end in itself and was unconcerned with fundamental questions about law’s nature, sources, and consequences as a social phenomenon or about its moral groundings. (2002, p. 633)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 40.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, M (2010) ‘Social security and social welfare’ in P Cane and H Kritzer (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, M and J Gulland (2003) Tribunal Users’ Experiences, Perceptions and Expectations: A Literature Review (London: Council on Tribunals)

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T R S (1993) Law, Liberty and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R (2007) ‘The Freedom of Information Act 2000: a sheep in wolf’s clothing?’ in J Jowell and D Oliver (eds) The Changing Constitution 6th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J, N Wikeley and R Young (1992) Judging Social Security: The Adjudication of Claims for Benefit in Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R (1995) Rules and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R and C McCrudden (eds) (1987) Regulation and Public Law (London: Weidenfield & Nicolson)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R, C Hood and C Scott (eds) (1998) Reader on Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamforth, N and P Leyland (2003) Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barendt, E (1998) An Introduction to Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, H (2011) Constitutional and Administrative Law 8th edn (Abingdon: Routledge)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, G and C Hood (2006) ‘What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system’ 84(3) Public Administration 517–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J (1997) Rules and Regulators (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, A and K Ewing (2010) Constitutional and Administrative Law 15th edn (Harlow: Pearson Education)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradney, A (1998) ‘Law as a parasitic discipline’ 25(1) Journal of Law and Society 71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradney, A (2010) ‘The place of empirical legal research in the law school curriculum’ in P Cane and H Kritzer (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, L, G Mezsaros and M Sunkin (1996) Judicial Review in Perspective 2nd edn (London: Cavendish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, T (1998) ‘Judicial review and the discretionary social fund’ in T Buck (ed.) Judicial Review and Social Welfare (London: Pinter)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, T, R Kirkham and B Thompson (2011) The Ombudsman Enterprise and Administrative Justice (Aldershot: Ashgate)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane, P (2004) Administrative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane, P and H Kritzer (eds) (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, P (2008) Administrative Law 6th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterrell, R (2006) Law Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory (Aldershot: Ashgate)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, D and S Halliday (2003) The Appeal of Internal Review: Law, Administrative Justice and the (Non -)Emergence of Disputes (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, D, S Halliday and C Hunter (2006) ‘Adjudicating the implementation of homelessness law: the promise of socio-legal studies’ 21(3) Housing Studies 381–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G, N Wikeley and R Young (1998) Child Support in Action (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cownie, F (2004) Legal Academics: Cultures and Identities (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Daintith, T and A Page (1999) The Executive in the Constitution: Structure, Autonomy, and Internal Control (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A C L (2001) Accountability: A Public Law Analysis of Government by Contract (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dicey, A V (1915) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (London: Macmillan)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M and R Thomas (2011) Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Epp, C (2009) Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats and the Creation of the Legalistic State (Chicago: Chicago University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erdos, D (2010) Delegating Rights Protections: The Rise of Bills of Rights in the Westminster World (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, O (1957) Report of the Committee on Administrative Tribunals and Enquiries Cmnd 218 (London: HMSO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L and R V Percival (1981) The Roots of Justice: Crime and Punishment in Alameda County, California, 1870–1910 (Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, D J (1996) ‘Introduction’ in D J Galligan (ed.) A Reader on Administrative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A and R Thomas (2010) ‘The changing context of governance’ in M Adler (ed.) Administrative Justice in Context (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Genn, H (1994) ‘Tribunal review of administrative decision-making’ in G Richardson and H Genn (eds) Administrative Law and Government Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Genn, H, B Lever and L Gray (2006) Tribunals for Diverse Users (London: Department for Constitutional Affairs)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C (2010) ‘Researching impact’ 39 The Ombudsman 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, C (1986) Praying for Justice: Faith, Order and Community in an American Town (Ithaca: Cornell University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, J A G (1974) Parliamentary Scrutiny of Government Bills (London: Allen & Unwin)

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, J A G (1979) ‘The political constitution’ 42 Modern Law Review 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield, B and E Weaver (1995) ‘Judicial review in perspective: an investigation of trends in the use and operation of judicial review in Northern Ireland’ 46 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 113–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C, C Hood and C Scott (2000) Telecommunications Regulation: Culture, Chaos and Inter-dependence inside the Regulatory Process (London: Routledge)

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, S (2004) Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart)

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, S, N Burns, N Hutton, F McNeill and C Tata (2008) ‘Shadow writing and participant observation: a study of criminal justice social work around sentencing’ 35 (1) Journal of Law and Society 189–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, S, N Burns, N Hutton, F McNeill and C Tata (2009) ‘Street-level bureaucracy, interprofessional relations and coping mechanisms: a study of criminal justice social workers in the sentencing process’ 31(4) Law and Policy 405–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, S, J Ilan and C Scott (2011) ‘The public management of liability risks’ 31(3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 527–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, S and C Scott (2010) ‘Administrative justice’ in P Cane and H Kritzer (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, C (2004) State Liability: Tort Law and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, C and R Rawlings (2009) Law and Administration 3rd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D (1983) ‘The development of socio-legal studies in the United Kingdom’ 3 Legal Studies 315–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K (1984) Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K (2002) Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertogh, M (2001) ‘Coercion, co-operation and control: understanding the policy impact of administrative courts and the ombudsman in the Netherlands’ 23 Law and Policy 47–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C (1991) ‘A public management for all seasons’ 69 Public Administration 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C, C Scott, O James, G Jones and T Travers (1999) Regulation Inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police, and Sleaze-Busters (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W I (1933) The Law and the Constitution (London: University of London Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • John, G (2009) Relations that Unite and Divide: A Study of Freedom of Information Legislation and Transparency in Scotland (PhD thesis, University of St Andrews)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowell, J and D Oliver (eds) (2007) The Changing Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J (2007) ‘The justiciability of resource allocation’ 70(2) Modern Law Review 197–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J (2010) ‘Proportionality: a halfway house’ New Zealand Law Review 327–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, R L (2007) Defining Rights and Wrongs: Bureaucracy, Human Rights and Public Accountability (Vancouver: UBC Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, I and J Lonsdale (2010) ‘The audit society: helping to develop or undermine trust in government?’ in M Adler (ed.) Administrative Justice in Context (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggatt, A (2001) Tribunals for Users: One System, One Service (London: Lord Chancellor’s Department)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, P (2007) ‘Standards of conduct in public life’ in J Jowell and D Oliver (eds) The Changing Constitution 6th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (New York: Russell Sage Foundation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveland, I (1995) Housing Homeless Persons: Administrative Law and Process (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin, M (1992) Public Law and Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin, M (2000) Sword and Scales: An Examination of the Relationship Between Law and Politics (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin, M (2003) The Idea of Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin, M and C Scott (1997) ‘The regulatory state’ in P Dunleavy, A Gamble, I Holliday and G Peele (eds) Developments in British Politics 5 (Basingstoke: MacMillan)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B and K Yeung (2007) An Introduction to Law and Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, L (2003) Disputing Doctors: The Socio-Legal Dynamics of Complaints about Medical Care (Buckingham: Open University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, T, K Pick and T Prosser (1996) Judicial Review in Scotland (Chichester: Wiley)

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E (2001) Governing by Numbers: Delegated Legislation and Everyday Policy Making (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, A A (1982) The Law Lords (London: MacMillan)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, L, M Sunkin and K Calvo (2010) ‘Judicial review litigation as an incentive to change in local authority public services in England and Wales’ 20 (suppl. 2) Journal of Public Administration Theory and Research 243–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, T (2007) ‘Regulation, markets and legitimacy’ in D Oliver and J Jowell (eds) The Changing Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G (2004) ‘Impact studies in the UK’ in M Hertogh and S Halliday (eds) Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G and M Sunkin (1996) ‘Judicial review: questions of impact’ Public Law 79–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, W A (1928) Justice and Administrative Law (London: Macmillan)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P (1994) (ed.) The History of Criminology (Aldershot: Dartmouth)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, G (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (Chicago: Chicago University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, E (2005) Beyond Camelot: Rethinking Politics and Law for the Modern State (Princeton: Princeton University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Study of Parliament Group (1981) ‘Private Bill procedure: a case for reform’ Public Law 206–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkin, M (1987) ‘What is happening to applications for judicial review?’ 50 Modern Law Review 432–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunkin, M and K Pick (2001) ‘The changing impact of judicial review: the independent review service of the social fund’ Public Law 753–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkin, M and V Bondy (2008) ‘Accessing judicial review proceedings’ Public Law 647–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkin, M and V Bondy (2009) ‘Settlement in judicial review proceedings’ Public Law 237–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkin, M, K Calvo, L Platt and T Landman (2007) ‘Mapping the use of judicial review to challenge local authorities in England and Wales’ Public Law 545–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P (1997) ‘Socio-legal studies: the case of disappearing fleas and bustards’ in P Thomas (ed.) Socio-Legal Studies (Aldershot: Dartmouth)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R (2011) Administrative Justice and Asylum Appeals: A Study of Tribunal Adjudication (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B (2010) ‘Current developments in the UK: system building–from tribunals to administrative justice’ in M Adler (ed.) Administrative Justice in Context (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, A (1998) The Constitution after Scott: Government Unwrapped (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, A (2003) Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, A (2005) Our Republican Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevor-Roper, H R (1969) ‘The past and the present: history and sociology’ 42(1) Past and Present 3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twining, W (1993) ‘Remembering 1972: the Oxford Centre in the context of developments in higher education and the discipline of law’ 22 Journal of Law and Society, Special Issue 35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent-Jones, P (2006) The New Public Contracting: Regulation, Responsiveness, Relationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, F and K Hollingsworth (1999) Audit, Accountability and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Simon Halliday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of York, UK

    Caroline Hunter

Copyright information

© 2012 Simon Halliday

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halliday, S. (2012). Public Law. In: Hunter, C. (eds) Integrating Socio-Legal Studies into the Law Curriculum. Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-01603-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation