The Challenges Facing the Multilateral Trading System in Addressing Global Public Policy Objectives

  • Christophe Bellmann
  • Jonathan Hepburn
  • Marie Wilke
Part of the International Development Policy book series (IDP)


Despite a record-breaking 14.5 per cent increase in world merchandise exports, the effects of the financial crisis and global recession are still hampering faster economic recovery. Relatively high oil prices combined with persistent unemployment and measures designed to reduce budget deficits have undermined short-term growth prospects. While South—South trade continues to explode, trade imbalances — i.e. the gap between exports and imports — widened in 2010 compared to 2009 (although smaller than precrisis levels). Meanwhile, trade negotiations under the Doha Round have reached an impasse, generating uncertainties about the future of the World Trade Organization (WTO) as a negotiating forum. Under these circumstances, should the system rethink its decision-making process founded upon the predominance of member states, the principle of consensus and the notion of single undertaking, as some critics have suggested? And, if so, how could such a reform agenda be initiated at the WTO? Moreover, beyond the negotiating function of the WTO, the paralysis of the system also raises urgent questions about the ability of the system to respond to pressing challenges of our times, such as trade and climate change, or food security and price volatility.


Food Security Gross Domestic Product World Trade Organization Uruguay Round Doha Round 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AFDB (African Development Bank), OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), UNECA (United Nations Economic Commission for Africa) (2011) African Economic Outlook2011 (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad, M. (2011) Improving the International Governance of Food Security and Trade (Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development).Google Scholar
  3. Anghie, A. (2005) Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Consultative Board to the Director-General (2004) The Future of the WTO: Addressing Institutional Changes in the New Millennium (Geneva: World Trade Organization).Google Scholar
  5. Cottier, T. and M. Elsig (2009) Reforming the WTO: The Decisions-Making Triangle Re-Addressed, paper presented at the World Trade Forum, World Trade Institute, University of Bern.Google Scholar
  6. Cottier, T. and S. Takenoshita (2008) ‘Decisions-Making and the Balance of Powers in WTO Negotiations: Towards Supplementary Weighted Voting’, in Griller, S. (ed.) At the Crossroads: The World Trading System and the Doha Round (Vienna: Springer).Google Scholar
  7. Croome, J. (1995) Reshaping the World Trading System (Geneva: World Trade Organisation — WTO).Google Scholar
  8. Deere-Birbeck, C. (2009) Momentum Builds for Discussion of Reform at WTO Ministerial Conference, Global Economic Governance Programme’s blog, 20 November, (accessed on 27 September 2011).Google Scholar
  9. Deere-Birbeck, C. and C. Monagle (2009) Strengthening Multilateralism: A Mapping of Selected Proposals on WTO Reform and Improvements in Global Trade Governance, discussion draft (Geneva/ Oxford: ICTSD and Global Economic Governance Programme).Google Scholar
  10. Elsig, M. (2008) The World Trade Organization at Work: Performance in a Member-Driven Milieu, paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, New York, 15–18 February.Google Scholar
  11. Elsig, M. (2009) ‘WTO Decisions-Making: Can We Get a Little Help from the Secretariat and the Critical Mass’, in Steger, D.P. (ed.) Redesigning the World Trade Organization for the Twenty-first Century (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press).Google Scholar
  12. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development), IMF (International Monetary Fund), OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), WFP (World Food Programme), World Bank, WTO, IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute) and the UN HLTF (High-Level Task Force) (2011) Price Volatility in Food and Agricultural Markets: Policy Responses (Rome: FAO), (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  13. FAO (1996) Rome Declaration on Food Security and World Food Summit Plan of Action, W3613 (Rome: FAO).Google Scholar
  14. Harbinson, S. (2009) The Doha Round: Death-Defying Agenda’ or ‘Don’t Do it Again?, ECIPE (European Centre for International Political Economy) Working Paper no. 10 (Brussels: ECIPE).Google Scholar
  15. Hepburn, J. and C. Bellmann (2009) ‘Doha Round Negotiations on the Green Box and Beyond’, in Meléndez-Ortiz, R., C. Bellmann and J. Hepburn (eds) Agricultural Subsidies in the WTO Green Box: Ensuring Coherence with Sustainable Development Goals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Hufbauer, G. (2005) ‘Inconsistencies Between Diagnosis and Treatment’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8 (2), pp. 291–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ICTSD (International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development) (2006) ‘EU Food Aid Paper Proposes Strict Disciplines to Prevent Commercial Displacement’, Bridges Weekly, 10(15), 3 May, (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  18. ICTSD (2008a) ‘Agricultural Safeguard Controversy Triggers Breakdown in Doha Round Talks’, Bridges Weekly, 12(27), 7 August, (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  19. ICTSD (2008b) ‘Concern Grows over New IP Agreement’, Bridges Monthly, 12(5), November,–5. pdf (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  20. ICTSD (2009) WTO Ministerial Conference Opens in Geneva: Expect No Surprises, Bridges Daily Update, 30 November, (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  21. ICTSD (2010) ‘Under Threat of Higher Food Prices, WTO Members Debate Export Restrictions, Subsidies’, Bridges Weekly, 14(41), 24 November, (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  22. ICTSD (2011a) ‘G-20 Agriculture Ministers Unveil Plan to Tackle High Food Prices’, Bridges Weekly, 15(24), 29 June, (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  23. ICTSD (2011b) ‘OECD, FAO: No End for High Food Prices in Upcoming Decade’, Bridges Weekly, 15(23), 22 June, bridgesweekly/109150/ (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  24. ICTSD (2011c) ‘Agricultural Export Restrictions Spark Controversy at the WTO’, Bridges Weekly, 15(12), 6 April, (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  25. ICTSD (2011d) ‘Tensions Build over Chinese Rare Earth Quotas’, Bridges Trade BioRes, 11 (16), 25 July, (accessed on 27 September 2011).Google Scholar
  26. ICTSD/FAO (2007) Indicators for the Selection of Agricultural Special Products: Some Empirical Evidence (Geneva: ICTSD).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ismail, F. and B. Vickers (2011) ‘Towards Fair and Inclusive Decision-Making in WTO Negotiations’, in Deere-Birbeck, C. (ed.) Making Global Trade Governance Work for Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Jackson, J. (2001) ‘The WTO “Constitution” and Proposed Reforms: Seven “Mantras” Revisited’, Journal of International Economic Law, 4(1), pp. 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keohane, R. and J. Nye (2000) Between Centralization and Fragmentation: The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy, paper presented at the American Political Science Convention, Washington, DC, 31 August-3 September.Google Scholar
  30. Lamy, P. (2003) After Cancun, Statements by Pascal Lamy, EU Trade Commissioner, at the Press Conference Closing the 5th WTO Ministerial Conference in Cancun on 14 September, (accessed on 27 September 2011).Google Scholar
  31. Low, P. (2009) WTO Decision Making for the Future, paper presented at Thinking Ahead on International Trade (TAIT) Inaugural Conference, Geneva, 17–18 September.Google Scholar
  32. Mably, P. (2007) The Role of Research on Trade Policy Changes Affecting the Developing World: Group of 33 Influence at the World Trade Organization, Latin American Trade Network Working Paper no. 77 (Buenos Aires: Latin American School of Social Sciences), (accessed on 27 September 2011).Google Scholar
  33. Matthews, A. (2011) The Impact of WTO Agricultural Trade Rules on Food Security and Development: An Examination of Proposed Additional Flexibilities for Developing Countries, IIIS (Institute for International Integration Studies) Discussion Paper no. 371 (Dublin: IIIS, Trinity College), dp 371.pdf (accessed on 27 September 2011).Google Scholar
  34. Mayer, J. (2011) Structural Change, Global Imbalances, and Employment in the Least Developed Countries, Policy Brief no. 1 (Geneva: ICTSD).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oxfam (2002) Rigged Rules and Double Standards. Trade, Globalisation and the Fight Against Poverty (Brussels/Geneva/New York/Washington: Oxfam), (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  36. Pauwelyn, J. (2005) ‘The Sutherland Report: A Missed Opportunity for Genuine Debate on Trade, Globalization and Reforming the WTO’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8(2), pp. 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodriguez Mendoza, M. and M. Wilke (2011) ‘Revisiting the Single Undertaking: Towards a More Balanced Approach to WTO Negotiations’, in Deere-Birbeck C. (ed.) (2011) Making Global Trade Governance Work for Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  38. Rolland, S. (2010) ‘Redesigning the Negotiation Process at the WTO’, Journal of International Economic Law, 13(65), pp. 65–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Steger, D. (ed.) (2009) ‘Why Institutional Reform of the WTO is Necessary’, in Redesigning the World Trade Organization (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press), pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  40. Steinberg, R. (2002) ‘In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes at the GATT/WTO’, International Organizations, 56(2), pp. 339–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tangermann, S. (2011) ‘Securing Food in Volatile Markets: From Rhetoric to Action?’, The Daily News Egypt, 17 July, (accessed on 27 September 2011).
  42. UNCTAD (2011) World Investment Report 2011, Non-EquityModes of International Production and Development (Geneva: UNCTAD).Google Scholar
  43. United Nations General Assembly (1948) Universal Declaration of Human Rights (New York: United Nations), (accessed on 27 September 2011).Google Scholar
  44. United Nations General Assembly (1966) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (New York: United Nations), (accessed on 27 September 2011).Google Scholar
  45. United Nations General Assembly (2000) United Nations Millennium Declaration. A/RES/55/2 (New York: United Nations).Google Scholar
  46. Van Grasstek, C. and P. Sauvé (2006) ‘The Consistency of WTO Rules: Can the Single Undertaking be Squared with Variable Geometry’, Journal of International Economic Law, 9(4), pp. 837–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Warwick Commission (2007) The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which WayForward? (Coventry: Warwick University).Google Scholar
  48. Wolfe, R. (2009) ‘The Special Safeguard Fiasco in the WTO: The Perils of Inadequate Analysis and Negotiation’, World Trade Review, 8(4), pp. 517–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. WTO (1999a) ‘Agreement on Agriculture’, in The Legal Texts: The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  50. WTO (1999b) ‘Decision on the Application and Review of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes’, in The Legal Texts: The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  51. WTO (1999c) ‘Decision on Measures Concerning the Possible Negative Effects of the Reform Programme on Least-Developed and Net Food-Importing Developing Countries’, in The Legal Texts: The Results of the UruguayRound ofMultilateral Trade Negotiations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  52. WTO (1999d) ‘Marrakech Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization’, in The Legal Texts: The Results of the UruguayRound ofMultilateral Trade Negotiations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  53. WTO (2001) Doha Ministerial Declaration, WT/ MIN(01)/DEC/1 (Doha: WTO).Google Scholar
  54. WTO (2005) Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration, WT/ MIN(05)/DEC (Hong Kong: WTO).Google Scholar
  55. WTO (2009) Strengthening the WTO, WT/MIN(09)/W/1, Communication from Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Hong Kong China, European Communities, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mauritius, Mexico, Norway, South Africa, Switzerland, Turkey, United States and Uruguay (Geneva: WTO).Google Scholar
  56. WTO (2011a) World Trade Report 2011. The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence (Geneva: WTO).Google Scholar
  57. WTO (2011b) Quarterly World Merchandise Trade by Region and Selected Economies (Geneva: WTO), (accessed on 8 November 2011).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christophe Bellmann
  • Jonathan Hepburn
  • Marie Wilke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations