Implementing Global Public Policies: Are the Aid Agencies Walking the Talk?
Beyond much rhetoric and stated ambition in recent years, the implementation of global public policies has been weak so far. There is a huge gap between the official discourse and the reality. This chapter focuses on the role, commitment and performance of aid agencies as ‘small’ but important suppliers of global public goods. While acknowledging some advances in the right direction (broad international recognition and improved costing of the global risks, consensus on the high vulnerability of the low-income countries and the need to act urgently, and substantial financing commitments) the author argues, based on available evidence from evaluations and effectiveness reviews, that only limited progress has been made in the aid delivery model and that the poor have not yet gained much from these undertakings. The chapter makes the case that significant institutional, organisational and operational reforms must take place urgently in aid agencies. The international community, moreover, must address the high fragmentation and proliferation of the aid architecture, in order to set the stage for a credible response to the global challenges facing developing countries.
KeywordsGlobal Public Good Development Assistance Committee Green Climate Fund Food Security Program Independent Evaluation Group
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Further Reading
- Bird, N., J. Brown and L. Shatalek (2011) Design Challenges for the Green Climate Fund (London: Overseas Development Institute/Heinrich Boell Stiftung, Policy Brief 4).Google Scholar
- Conseil fédéral suisse (2010) ‘Message du 17 septembre 2010 concernant l’augmentation des moyens pour le financement de l’aide publique au développement’, 10.085, Feuille fédérale (2010: 6145). http://www.parlament.ch/f/suche/pages/geschaefte.aspx?gesch_id=20100085 (accessed on 30 August 2011).
- DFID (Department for International Development) and UKaid (2011) Multilateral Aid Review, Ensuring Maximum Value for Money for UK Aid through Multilateral Organizations (London: DFID/UKaid).Google Scholar
- ECOSOC (United Nations Economic and Social Council) (2008) Trends in South-South and Triangular Development Cooperation. Background Study for the Development Cooperation Forum (New York: United Nations), http://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/docs/pdfs/south-south_cooperation.pdf (accessed 30 on August 2011).Google Scholar
- IEG (Independent Evaluation Group) (2008) Annual Review of Development Effectiveness 2008: Shared Global Challenges (Washington, DC: The World Bank).Google Scholar
- IEG (2009a) Annual Review of Development Effectiveness 2009: Achieving Sustainable Development (Washington, DC: The World Bank).Google Scholar
- IEG (2009b) Improving Effectiveness and Outcomes for the Poor in Health, Nutrition and Population. An Evaluation of WBG Support since 1997 (Washington, DC: The World Bank).Google Scholar
- IEG (2010) Climate Change and the WBG, Phase II: The Challenge of Low-Carbon Development (Washington, DC: The World Bank).Google Scholar
- IEG (2011a) The World Bank’s Involvement in Global and Regional Partnership Programs: An Independent Assessment (Washington, DC: The World Bank).Google Scholar
- IEG (2011b) Trust Fund Support for Development: An Evaluation of the World Bank’s Trust Fund Portfolio (Washington, DC: The World Bank).Google Scholar
- Isenman, P., C. Wathne and G. Baudienville (2010) Global Funds: Allocation Strategies and Aid Effectiveness (London: Overseas Development Institute).Google Scholar
- Macro International Inc. (2009) The Five-Year Evaluation of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Synthesis of Study Areas 1, 2 and 3 (Geneva: Macro International Inc./GFATM).Google Scholar
- Oates, N., D. Conway and R. Calow (2011) The Mainstreaming Approach to Climate Change Adaptation: Insights from Ethiopia’s Water Sector (London: Overseas Development Institute, Background Note).Google Scholar
- OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2009) Managing Aid. Practices of DAC Member Countries, Better Aid (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
- OECD (2011) 2011 DAC Report on Multilateral Aid, DCD/DAC(2011)21/FINAL (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
- OECD, DAC (Development Assistance Committee) and EPOC (Environment Policy Committee) (2009) Policy Guidance on Integrating Climate Change Adaptation into Development Cooperation (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
- OECD/DCD (Development Cooperation Directorate) (2011) Policy Changes in the DAC Members’ Development Cooperation, 2010 (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
- SDC (Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation) and SECO (State Secretariat for Economic Affairs) (2010) Report on Effectiveness, Swiss Development Cooperation in the Agricultural Sector (Bern: SDC/SECO).Google Scholar
- Severino, J.M. and O. Ray (2010) The End of ODA (II): The Birth of Hypercollective Action, Working Paper 218 (Washington, DC: Center for Global Development).Google Scholar
- World Bank (2007) Global Public Goods: A Framework for the Role of the World Bank, DC2007–0020 (Washington, DC: The World Bank).Google Scholar