Skip to main content

Beyond Aid: Policy Coherence and Europe’s Development Policy

  • Chapter

Part of the International Development Policy book series (IDP)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the evolution of the concept of policy coherence for development (PCD) since the beginning of the twenty-first century. It finds that, despite rhetorical commitments made in various contexts, results have been modest, as governments in the North have found it difficult to go beyond their short-term political and economic interests. This chapter concentrates not only on explanations related to the widened agenda in international development and the domestic structures within individual countries, but also on two additional significant factors. First, the search for PCD can be understood as a rhetorical attempt to shift responsibilities from aid agencies to actors involved in other public policy areas affecting developing countries. Second, the two actors pushing the PCD agenda forward — the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) and the European Commission (EC) — have had other interests beyond development effectiveness. The EC has been concerned with projecting a common European vision in international development and increasing the visibility of the European Union (EU) in international affairs, while the DAC has tried to protect its role and relevance in the field of international development.

Keywords

  • European Union
  • European Commission
  • International Development
  • World Trade Organization
  • Development Cooperation

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-00357-7_11
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-137-00357-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashoff, G. (2005) Enhancing Policy Coherence for Development: Justification, Recognition and Approaches to Achievements, DIE Studies no. 11 (Bonn: German Development Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (2007) The European Union and International Development: The Politics of Foreign Aid (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (2008) ‘Mission Impossible: The European Union and Policy Coherence for Development’, Journal of European Integration, 30(3), pp. 323–42, DOI: 10.1080/07036330802144992

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (ed.) (2009) Policy Coherence and EU Development Policy (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (2011) ‘The EU and the Developing World: Partnership, Poverty, Politicisation’, in Hill, C. and M. Smith (eds) International Relations and the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 324–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2007) ‘The Security-Development Nexus and the Rise of “Anti-Foreign Policy”’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 10, pp. 362–86, DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800135

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H-J. (2007) Bad Samaritans: Rich Nations, Poor Policies and the Threat to the Developing World (London: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • CONCORD (2009) Spotlight on Policy Coherence (Brussels: CONCORD), http://www.concord.se/page.asp?id=360&lang=EN (accessed on 5 December 2011).

  • DAC (Development Assistance Committee) (1996) Shaping the 21st Century, The Contribution of Development Cooperation (Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development — OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAC (2010) Development Cooperation Report2010 (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Francesco, M. (2001) ‘Process not Outcomes in New Public Management? “Policy Coherence” in Australian Government’, The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 1(3) pp. 103–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (ed.) (2008) Reinventing Foreign Aid (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer, C. (2006) Policy Coherence for Development in the EU Council: Strategies for the Way Forward (Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission) (2005) Policy Coherence for Development — Accelerating Progress Towards Attaining the Millennium Development Goals, COM (2005)134, 12 April (Brussels: Commission of the European Communities).

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2006) The European Consensus on Development (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the Eurouean Communitiesl.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2007) EU Report on Policy Coherence for Development, COM (2007)545, 20 September (Brussels: Commission of the European Communities).

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2009) EU Report on Policy Coherence for Development, COM (2009)461, 17 September (Brussels: Commission of the European Communities).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, J. and O. Stokke (1999) ‘Coherence of Policies towards Developing Countries: Approaching the Problematique’, in Forster, J. and O. Stokke (eds) Policy Coherence in Development Co-operation (London: Frank Cass), pp. 16–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabel, I. (2007) ‘Policy Coherence or Conformance? The New World Bank-International Monetary Fund-World Trade Organisation Rhetoric on Trade and Investment in Development Countries’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 39(3), pp. 335–41, DOI:10.1177/0486613407305281

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. (2009) ‘The EU and the Global Development Agenda’, in Carbone, M. (ed.) Policy Coherence and EU Development Policy (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoebink, P. (2004) The Treaty of Maastricht and Europe’s Development Co-operation (Amsterdam: Aksant).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hydén, G. (1999) ‘The Shifting Grounds of Policy Coherence in Development Co-operation’, in Forster, J. and O. Stokke (eds) Policy Coherence in Development Co-operation (London: Frank Cass), pp. 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein, E.B. (2004) The Politics of Policy Coherence, paper presented at the OECD Policy Workshop on ‘Institutional Approaches to Policy Coherence for Development’, Paris, 18–19 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., F.H. Rogers and N. Eubank (2010) Aid Quality and Donor Rankings, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lahnalampi, R. (2007) The Policy Coherence for Development Work in the OECD, presentation at the OECD Workshop ‘More Coherent Policies for More Inclusive Growth and Development’, Paris, 30 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, D. (2009) Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There is a Better Way for Africa (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1996) Building Policy Coherence: Tools and Tensions (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003) Policy Coherence: Vital for Global Development (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) Building Blocks for Policy Coherence for Development (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, R. (2005) ‘The Evaluation of Policy Coherence for Development’, Evaluation, 11(3), pp. 311–30, DOI: 10.1177/1356389005058479

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Orbie, J. (ed.) (2008) Europe’s Global Role: External Policies of the European Union (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. and J. Walz (2010) Commitment to Development Index2010 (Washington, DC: Center for Global Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2011) Commitment to Development Index2011 (Washington, DC: Center for Global Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoeven, R. (2010) ‘Policy Coherence: The Newest Fad in the International Discourse?’, in Hoebink, P. (ed.) European Development Cooperation: In Between the Local and the Global (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press), pp. 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, L.A. (2004) ‘Coherence with No “Here”: WTO Co-operation with the World Bank and the IMF’, in Nelson, D. (ed.) The Political Economy of Policy Reform: Essays in Honor of J. Michael Finger (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 329–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, L.A. (2007) ‘Coherence and the WTO’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(3), pp. 461–80, DOI:10.1093/oxrep/grm019

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carbone, M. (2012). Beyond Aid: Policy Coherence and Europe’s Development Policy. In: International Development Policy: Aid, Emerging Economies and Global Policies. International Development Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-00357-7_11

Download citation