Surface Potential Temperature as an Analysis and Forecasting Tool
In the last decade, Fred Sanders was often critical of current surface analysis techniques. This led to his promoting the use of surface potential temperatures to distinguish between fronts, baroclinic troughs, and nonfrontal baroclinic zones, and to the development of a climatology of surface baroclinic zones. In this paper, criticisms of current surface analysis techniques and the usefulness of surface potential temperature analyses are discussed. Case examples are used to compare potential temperature analyses and current National Centers for Environmental Prediction analyses.
The 1-yr climatology of Sanders and Hoffman is reconstructed using a composite technique. Annual and seasonal mean potential temperature analyses over the continental United States, southern Canada, northern Mexico, and adjacent coastal waters are presented. In addition, gridpoint frequencies of moderate and strong potential temperature gradients are calculated. The results of the mean potential temperature analyses show that moderate and strong surface baroclinic zones are favored along the coastlines and the slopes of the North American cordillera. Additional subsynoptic details, not found in Sanders and Hoffman, are identified. The availability of the composite results allows for the calculation of potential temperature gradient anomalies. It is shown that these anomalies can be used to identify significant frontal baroclinic zones that are associated with weak potential temperature gradients. Together the results and reviews in this paper show that surface potential temperature analyses are a valuable forecasting and analysis tool allowing analysts to distinguish and identify fronts, baroclinic troughs, and nonfrontal baroclinic zones.
KeywordsPotential Temperature Potential Vorticity Eastern Slope Sierra Nevada Mountain Potential Temperature Gradient
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ahrens, C. D., 2005: Essentials of Meteorology: An Invitation to the Atmosphere. 4th ed. Brooks/Cole, 473 pp.Google Scholar
- Bjerknes, J., 1919: On the structure of moving cyclones. Geof. Publ., 1, 1–9.Google Scholar
- -and H. Solberg, 1922: Life cycle of cyclones and the polar front theory of atmospheric circulation. Geofys. Publ., 3, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Morgan, G. M., Jr., D. G. Brunkow, and R. C. Beebe, 1975: Climatology of surface fronts. Illinois State Water Survey Circular 122, Dept. of Registration and Education, Urbana, IL, 46 pp.Google Scholar
- Namias, J., 1983: The history of polar front and air mass concepts in the United States—An eyewitness account. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 64, 734–755.Google Scholar
- Petterssen, S., 1940: Weather Analysis and Forecasting. 1st ed. Mc-Graw-Hill, 503 pp.Google Scholar
- Uccellini, L. W., S. F. Corfidi, N. W. Junker, P. J. Kocin, and D. A. Olson, 1992: Report on the Surface Analysis Workshop held at the National Meteorological Center, 25–28 March 1991. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 73, 459–473.Google Scholar
- Wallace, J. M., and P. V. Hobbs, 1977: Atmospheric Science: An Introductory Survey. Academic Press, 467 pp.Google Scholar