Back to Norway: An Essay

Part of the Meteorological Monographs book series (METEOR, volume 33, No. 55)


The advent of the polar front theory of cyclones in Norway early in the last century held that the development of fronts and air masses is central to understanding midlatitude weather phenomena. While work on fronts continues to this day, the concept of air masses has been largely forgotten, superseded by the idea of a continuum. The Norwegians placed equal emphasis on the thermodynamics of airmass formation and on the dynamical processes that moved air masses around; today, almost all the emphasis is on dynamics, with little published literature on diabatic processes acting on a large scale. In this essay, the author argues that a lack of understanding of large-scale diabatic processes leads to an incomplete picture of the atmosphere and contributes to systematic errors in medium- and long-range weather forecasts. At the same time, modern concepts centered around potential vorticity conservation and inversion lead one to a redefinition of the term “air mass” that may have some utility in conceptualizing atmospheric physics and in weather forecasting.


Rossby Wave Planetary Boundary Layer Potential Vorticity Radiative Cool Latent Heat Release 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bergeron, T., 1928: Über die dreidimensional verknüpfende Wetteranalysee. Geofys. Publ., 5(6), 73–78.Google Scholar
  2. Bjerknes, J., and H. Solberg, 1922: Life cycles of cyclones and the polar front theory of atmospheric circulations. Geofys. Publ., 3, 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. Bony, S., and K. A. Emanuel, 2001: A parameterization of the cloudiness associated with cumulus convection: Evaluation using TOGA COARE data. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 3158–3183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charney, J. G., 1947: The dynamics of long waves in a westerly baroclinic current. J. Meteor., 4, 135–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. -, and N. A. Phillips, 1953: Numerical integration of the quasigeostrophic equations for barotropic and simple baroclinic flows. J. Atmos. Sci., 10, 71–99.Google Scholar
  6. Curry, J., 1983: On the formation of continental polar air. J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 2278–2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eady, E. T., 1949: Long waves and cyclone waves. Tellus, 1, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emanuel, K. A., 1988: Observational evidence of slantwise convective adjustment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116, 1805–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. -, and M. Zivkovic-Rothman, 1999: Development and evaluation of a convection scheme for use in climate models. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1766–1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoskins, B. J., and F. P. Bretherton, 1972: Atmospheric frontogenesis models: Mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. -, M. E. McIntyre, and A. W. Robertson, 1985: On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 111, 877–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeffreys, H., 1925: On fluid motions produced by differences of temperature and humidity. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 51, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morcrette, J.-J., 1991: Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts forecasting system. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 9121–9132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Petterssen, S., 1956: Motion and Motion Systems. Vol. I. Weather Analysis and Forecasting, 2d ed., McGraw-Hill, 428 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Reed, R. J., 1955: A study of a characteristic type of upper-level frontogenesis. J. Meteor., 12, 226–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. -, and F. Sanders, 1953: An investigation of the development of a mid-tropospheric frontal zone and its associated vorticity field. J. Meteor., 10, 338–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sanders, F., 1955: An investigation of the structure and dynamics of an intense surface frontal zone. J. Meteor., 12, 542–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandstrom, J. W., 1908: Dynamische Versuche mit Meerwasser. Annals in Hydrodynamic Marine Meteorology, Vol. 36, 6–23.Google Scholar
  19. Wang, P.-Y., J. E. Martin, J. D. Locatelli, and P. V. Hobbs, 1995: Structure and evolution of winter cyclones in the central United States and their effects on the distribution of precipitation. Part II: Arctic fronts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 1328–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu, K.-M., and A. K. A. Emanuel, 1989: Is the tropical atmosphere conditionally unstable? Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1471–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Meteorological Society 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program in Atmospheres, Oceans, and ClimateMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations