Advertisement

Applying Life Cycle Assessment

  • Karli Verghese
  • Andrew Carre
Chapter

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (commonly known by its acronym LCA) is a useful sustainability tool and has many applications to support packaging decisions. In LCA, environmental impacts of product and packaging systems can be quantified in line with internationally accepted methodologies. With this knowledge, strategies can be identified and adopted that achieve the most effective and efficient environmental outcomes, and packaging design can be optimised. This chapter provides a general introduction to understanding and getting started with LCA, in particular for its application to product-packaging and packaging-system design. One important insight is that LCA studies have the potential to dispel common myths about packaging and sustainability issues. Packaging LCAs sometimes show that ‘rules of thumb’ or ‘common sense solutions’ simply do not apply or work in practice.

Keywords

Life Cycle Assessment Life Cycle Assessment Study Packaging System Life Cycle Assessment Practitioner Life Cycle Thinking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Horne R (2009) Life cycle assessment: origins, principles and context. In: Horne R, Grant T, Verghese K (eds) Life cycle assessment: principles, practice and prospects. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Standards Organisation (1997) ISO 14040 Environmental management standard—life cycle assessment, principles and framework. Australian Standards—Published as AS 14040:1998, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    UNEP, SETAC (2009) Life cycle management—how business uses it to decrease footprint, create opportunities and make value chains more sustainableGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guinée JB (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. Int J life Cycle Assess 7(5):311–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (2010) National carbon offset standard. Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuta CC, Koch DG, Hildebrandt CC, Janzen DC (1995) Improvement of products and packaging through the use of life cycle analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 14:185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Verghese K, Lockrey S, Clune S, Sivaraman D (2012) Life cycle assessment of food and beverage packaging. In: Yam K (ed) Innovative and sustainable food and beverage packaging, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England (in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parker G (2008) Measuring the environmental performance of food packaging: life cycle assessment. In: Chiellini E (ed) Environmentally compatible food packaging. Woodhead Publishing Limited, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    James K, Grant T, Sonneveld K (2002) Stakeholder involvement in Australian paper and packaging waste management LCA study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(3):151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verghese K (2008) Environmental assessment of food packaging and advanced methods for choosing the correct material. In: Chiellini E (ed) Environmentally compatible food packaging. Woodhead Publishing Limited, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ekvall T, Person L, Ryberg A, Widheden J, Frees N, Nielsen PH, Weidema BP, Wesnaes M (1998) Life cycle assessment of packaging systems for beer and soft drinks, in main report. Ministry of Environment and Energy, Danish Environmental Protection Agency, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Humbert S, Rossi V, Margni M, Jolliet O, Loerincik Y (2009) Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs. plastic pots. Int J LCA 14:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh SP, Chonhenchob V, Singh J (2006) Life cycle inventory and analysis of re-useable plastic containers and display-ready corrugated containers used for packaging fresh fruits and vegetables. Packag Technol Sci 19:279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bovea MD, Serrano J, Bruscas GM, Gallardo A (2006) Application of life cycle assessment to improve the environmental performance of a ceramic tile packaging system. Packag Technol Sci 19:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Madival S, Auras R, Singh SP, Narayan R (2009) Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology. J Clean Prod 17:1183–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Busser S, Jungbluth N (2009) The role of flexible packaging in the life cycle of coffee and butter. Int J LCA 14(1):S80–S91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewis H, Gertsakis J, Grant T, Morelli N, Sweatman A (2001) Design + environment: a global guide to designing greener goods. Greenleaf Publishing, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Curran MA (2006) Life cycle assessment: principles and practice National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, OhioGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Finkbeiner M (2009) Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats. Int J LCA 14:91–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sinden G (2009) The contribution of PAS 2050 to the evolution of international greenhouse gas emission standards. Int J LCA 14:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grant T, James K, Lundie S, Sonneveld K (2001) Stage 2 report for life cycle assessment for paper and packaging waste management scenarios in Victoria, for EcoRecycle Victoria. Centre for Design at RMIT University, Centre for Packaging Transportation and Storage at Victoria University and the Centre for Water and Waste Technology at University of New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Verghese K (2009) Life cycle assessment and waste management. In: Horne RE, Grant T, Verghese K (eds) Life cycle assessment: principles, practice and prospects. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goedkoop M, Oele M, de Schryver A, Vieira M (2008) Simapro database manual. Methods Library, Pre Consultants, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fry JM, Hartlin B, Wallén E, Aumônier S (2010) Life cycle assessment of example packaging systems for milk, in doorstep distribution system. Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boustead I (2001) Who gets the credit? http://www.plasticseurope.org/plastics-sustainability/life-cycle-thinking.aspx (cited 24 November 2010)
  27. 27.
    Erlov L, Lofgren C, Soras A (2000) Packaging—a tool for the prevention of environmental impact. Packforsk, KistaGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roy P, Nei D, Orikasa T, Xu Q, Okadome H, Nakamura N, Shiina T (2009) A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. J Food Eng 90:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for DesignRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations