Advertisement

Surgical Technique of Traditional Laparoscopic Access

  • Gernot Hudelist
  • Jörg Keckstein
Chapter

Abstract

The primary aim of any surgical procedure in gynecology is either to repair or eradicate benign or malignant disorders of the female genital tract. Within this, the potential of minimal invasive surgery for operative treatment gynecological diseases has increased dramatically because intraoperative and postoperative complication rates of laparoscopic procedures appear to be equally or even less frequent compared with conventional abdominal techniques [1, 2]. Compared with open surgical procedures, laparoscopic surgery is less painful for the patient, postoperative cosmetic results from a reduction of scar length are more satisfying, and most important, recovery and return to everyday life are more rapid with the laparoscopic approach [1].

Keywords

Abdominal Wall Minimal Invasive Surgery Intraabdominal Pressure Veress Needle Inferior Epigastric Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Collinet P, Ballester M, Fauconnier A, Deffieux X, Pierre F. Risks associated with laparoscopic entry. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2010;39(8 Suppl 2):S123–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garry R. The benefits and problems associated with minimal access surgery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42:239–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaudhuri T, Mandal K, Mandal D, Mondal J, Bose B, Basu A. Access in laparoscopy: an appraisal. J Indian Med Assoc. 2010;108(10):674–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keren D, Rainis T, Stermer E, Lavy A. A nine-year audit of open-access upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: results and experience of a single centre. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25(2):83–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sasmal PK, Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, Sen B. Primary access-related complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the closed technique: experience of a single surgical team over more than 15 years. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(11):2407–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonier HJ, Cuschieri A, et al. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(7):1121–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vilos GA. The ABCs of a safer laparoscopic entry. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:249–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29(5):433–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shamiyeh A, Glaser K, Kratochwill H, Hormandinger K, Fellner F, Wayand WU, et al. Lifting of the umbilicus for the installation of pneumoperitoneum with the Veress needle increases the distance to the retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal structures. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:313–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Palmer R. Safety in laparoscopy. J Reprod Med. 1974;13:1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agarwala N, Liu CY. Safe entry technique during laparoscopy: left upper quadrant entry using the ninth intercostal space: a review of 918 procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:55–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davila F, Tsin DA, Dominguez G, Davila U, Jesús R, Gomez de Arteche A. Transvaginal cholecystectomy without abdominal ports. JSLS. 2009;13(2):213–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garry R. Various approaches to laparoscopic hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;6:215–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reich H, Ribeiro SC, Rasmussen C, Rosenberg J, Vidali A. High-pressure trocar insertion technique. JSLS. 1999;3:45–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hasson HM. Open laparoscopy. Biomed Bull. 1984;5:1–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hasson HM, Rotman C, Rana N, Kumari NA. Open laparoscopy: 29-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(5 Pt 1):763–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang CC, Yang CY, Wu MH, Wang MY, Yeh CC, Lai IR, et al. Gasless laparoscopy-assisted versus open resection of small bowel lesions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(8):699–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu JM, Yang CY, Wang MY, Wu MH, Lin MT. Gasless laparoscopy-assisted versus open resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the upper stomach: preliminary results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(9):725–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bonjer HJ, Hazebroek EJ, Kazemier G, Giuffrida MC, Meijer WS, Lange JF. Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 1997;84:599–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E. Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:566–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A. Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2003;90:668–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    White JV. Consensus on laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1992;2:195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Agresta F, Mazzarolo G, Ciardo LF, Bedin N. The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed? A single-center review of a 15-year experience. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(5):1255–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kyung MS, Choi JS, Lee JH, Jung US, Lee KW. Laparoscopic management of complications in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: a 5-year experience in a single center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(6):689–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wind J, Cremers JE, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gouma DJ, Jansen FW, Bemelman WA. Medical liability insurance claims on entry-related complications in laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(11):2094–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Valtchev KL. Laparoscopic needle introducer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8(4):579–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, Boni L, Uccella S, Bergamini V, et al. Needlescopic hysterectomy: incorporation of 3-mm instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(10):2153–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ikeda F, Vanni D, Vasconcelos A, Podgaec S, Abrão MS. Microlaparoscopy vs. conventional laparoscopy for the management of early-stage pelvic endometriosis: a comparison. J Reprod Med. 2005;50(10):771–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tai HC, Lai MK, Chueh SC, Chen SC, Hsieh MH, Yu HJ. An alternative access technique under direct vision for preperitoneoscopic pelvic surgery: easier for the beginners. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(9):2589–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sabeti N, Tarnoff M, Kim J, Shikora S. Primary midline peritoneal access with optical trocar is safe and effective in morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(5):610–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hajdinjak T, Oakley NE. Use of optical dilating trocar for initial access during extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2007;21(9):1089–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pelosi MA, Pelosi 3rd MA. Laparoscopically assisted colpotomy with the Pelosi illuminator and Visiport trocar system. J Reprod Med. 1996;41(8):548–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Istre O, Keckstein J, Stark M, Mettler L. Abdominal access in gynaecological laparoscopy: a comparison between direct optical and blind closed access by Veress needle. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148(2):191–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Hudelist G, Istre O, Keckstein J. Abdominal access in gynaecologic laparoscopy: a comparison between direct optical and open access. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(4):529–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Guido M, Istre O, Keckstein J, Mettler L. Initial laparoscopic access in postmenopausal women: a preliminary prospective study. Menopause. 2009;16(5):966–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Minervini A, Davenport K, Pefanis G, Keeley Jr FX, Timoney AG. Prospective study comparing the bladeless optical access trocar versus Hasson open trocar for the establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic renal procedures. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2008;80(3):95–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rabl C, Palazzo F, Aoki H, Campos GM. Initial laparoscopic access using an optical trocar without pneumoperitoneum is safe and effective in the morbidly obese. Surg Innov. 2008;15(2):126–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Berch BR, Torquati A, Lutfi RE, Richards WO. Experience with the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in the performance of laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(8):1238–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brown JA, Canal D, Sundaram CP. Optical-access visual obturator trocar entry into desufflated abdomen during laparoscopy: assessment after 96 cases. J Endourol. 2005;19:853–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Altun H, Banli O, Karakoyun R, Boyuk A, Okuducu M, Onur E, et al. Direct trocar insertion technique for initial access in morbid obesity surgery: technique and results. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20(4):228–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Günenç MZ, Yesildaglar N, Bingöl B, Onalan G, Tabak S, Gökmen B. The safety and efficacy of direct trocar insertion with elevation of the rectus sheath instead of the skin for pneumoperitoneum. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005;15(2):80–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bernante P, Foletto M, Toniato A. Creation of pneumoperitoneum using a bladed optical trocar in morbidly obese patients: technique and results. Obes Surg. 2008;18(8):1043–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Agresta F, De Simone P, Ciardo LF, Bedin N. Direct trocar insertion vs Veress needle in non obese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures: a randomized prospective single-center study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1778–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD006583.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Perunovic RM, Scepanovic RP, Stevanovic PD, Ceranic MS. Complications during the establishment of laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(1):1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kroft J, Aneja A, Tyrwhitt J, Ternamian A. Laparoscopic peritoneal entry preferences among Canadian gynaecologists. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31(7):641–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pickett SD, Rodewald KJ, Billow MR, Giannios NM, Hurd WW. Avoiding major vessel injury during laparoscopic instrument insertion. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2010;37(3):387–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vilos GA, Vilos AG, Abu-Rafea B, Hollett-Caines J, Nikkhah-Abyaneh Z, Edris F. Three simple steps during closed laparoscopic entry may minimize major injuries. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(4):758–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gernot Hudelist
    • 1
  • Jörg Keckstein
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Endometriosis & Pelvic Pain ClinicWilhelminen HospitalViennaAustria
  2. 2.Abteilung Fur Gynakologie und Geburtshilfe , LandesKrankenHouse (LKH)VillachAustria

Personalised recommendations