Advertisement

Step Response Identification of Stable Processes

  • Tao Liu
  • Furong Gao
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Abstract

Generally, an open-loop step test is performed when the process is at zero initial state or in a nonzero steady state, so that an obvious dynamic (or transient) response of the process to a step change of the process input can be observed and measured for model identification. Certainly, a larger magnitude of the step change can facilitate a better observation of the transient response.

Keywords

Step Response Step Test Internal Model Control Model Mismatch Load Disturbance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahmed S, Huang B, Shah SL (2006) Parameter and delay estimation of continuous-time models using a linear filter. J Process Control 16:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed S, Huang B, Shah SL (2007) Novel identification method from step response. Control Eng Pract 15:545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed S, Huang B, Shah SL (2008) Identification from step responses with transient initial conditions. J Process Control 18:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Åström KJ, Hägglund T (1995) PID controller: theory, design, and tuning, 2nd edn. ISA Society of America, Research Triangle ParkGoogle Scholar
  5. Åström KJ, Hägglund T (2005) Advanced PID control. ISA Society of America, Research Triangle ParkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bi Q, Cai WJ, Lee EL, Wang QG, Hang CC, Zhang Y (1999) Robust identification of first-order plus dead-time model from step response. Control Eng Pract 7:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garnier H, Wang L (eds) (2008) Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodwin GC, Graebe L, Salgado ME (2001) Control system design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang CT, Huang MF (1993) Estimation of the second-order parameters from the process transients by simple calculation. Ind Eng Chem Res 32:228–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang HP, Jeng JC, Luo KY (2005) Auto-tune system using single-run relay feedback test and model-based controller design. J Process Control 15:713–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang HP, Lee MW, Chen CL (2001) A system of procedures for identification of simple models using transient step response. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:1903–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hwang SH, Lai ST (2004) Use of two-stage least-squares algorithms for identification of continuous systems with time delay based on pulse responses. Automatica 40:1561–1568MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jin HP, Heung IP, Lee I-B (1998) Closed-loop on-line process identification using a proportional controller. Chem Eng Sci 53(9):1713–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li SY, Cai WJ, Mei H, Xiong Q (2005) Robust decentralized parameter identification for two-input two-output process from closed-loop step responses. Control Eng Pract 13:519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu M, Wang QG, Huang B, Hang CC (2007) Improved identification of continuous-time delay processes from piecewise step tests. J Process Control 17:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu T, Gao F (2008) Robust step-like identification of low-order process model under nonzero initial conditions and disturbance. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53:2690–2695MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu T, Gao F (2010a) A frequency domain step response identification method for continuous-time processes with time delay. J Process Control 20(7):800–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu T, Gao F (2010b) Closed-loop step response identification of integrating and unstable processes. Chem Eng Sci 65(10):2884–2895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu T, Zhang WD, Gu DY (2005) Analytical two-degree-of-freedom tuning design for open-loop unstable processes with time delay. J Process Control 15:559–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu T, Zhou F, Yang Y, Gao F (2010) Step response identification under inherent-type load disturbance with application to injection molding. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(22):11572–11581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ljung L (1999) System identification: theory for the user, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffGoogle Scholar
  22. Luyben WL (1990) Process modeling, simulation, and control for chemical engineers. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Morari M, Zafiriou E (1989) Robust process control. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffGoogle Scholar
  24. Ogunnaike BA, Ray WH (1994) Process dynamics, modeling, and control. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Padhy PK, Majhi S (2006) Relay based PI-PD design for stable and unstable FOPDT processes. Comput Chem Eng 30:790–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pintelon R, Schoukens J (2001) System identification: a frequency domain approach. IEEE Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rake H (1980) Step response and frequency response methods. Automatica 16:519–526MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rangaiah GP, Krishnaswamy PR (1996) Estimating second-order dead time parameters from underdamped process transients. Chem Eng Sci 51:1149–1155Google Scholar
  29. Seborg DE, Edgar TF, Mellichamp DA (2004) Process dynamics and control, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  30. Shinskey FG (1996) Process control system, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Skogestad S (2003) Simple analytical rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. J Process Control 13:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Söderström T, Stoica P (1989) System identification. Prentice Hall, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Tan KK, Huang SN, Jiang X (2001) Adaptive control of ram velocity for the injection moulding machine. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 9:663–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tian YC, Gao F (1999) Injection velocity control of thermoplastic injection molding via a double controller scheme. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:3396–3406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang QG, Guo X, Zhang Y (2001a) Direct identification of continuous time delay systems from step responses. J Process Control 11:531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang QG, Zhang Y (2001b) Robust identification of continuous systems with dead-time from step responses. Automatica 37:377–390MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang QG, Lee TH, Lin C (2003) Relay feedback: analysis, identification and control. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang QG, Liu M, Hang CC, Tang W (2006) Robust process identification from relay tests in the presence of nonzero initial conditions and disturbance. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:4063–4070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang QG, Liu M, Hang CC, Zhang Y, Zheng WX (2008) Integral identification of continuous-time delay systems in the presence of unknown initial conditions and disturbances from step tests. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:4929–4936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yu CC (2006) Autotuning of PID controllers: a relay feedback approach, 2nd edn. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Zheng WX (1996) Identification of closed-loop systems with low-order controllers. Automatica 32(12):1753–1757MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhou KM, Doyle JC, Glover K (1996) Robust and optimal control. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyKowloonHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations