Abstract
This chapter honors Peter, then, in recounting my career-long experience (1970–2010) of staring down the devilishly difficult: the problem of model structure identification—of using models for discovery. I still regard this matter as one of the grand challenges of environmental modeling (Beck et al., White Paper, 2009). If I appear modest about our progress in the presence of such enormity, so I am. But let no-one presume that I am therefore not greatly enthused by the progress I believe I and my students (now colleagues) have made over these four decades. It has been a privilege to be allowed the time to work on such a most attractive and engaging topic.
When contemplating the interpretation of some time-series data, often have I thought: “Why bother with the struggle, when I could simply pass it all over to the virtuoso—Peter”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It did not, as it happens. The two co-exist fruitfully today, notwithstanding the supposed academic inferiority of the latter.
- 2.
The EPCL, a platform for real-time monitoring of water quality in a variety of aquatic environments, was operated from 1997 through 2008. All the data bases gathered with it are archived in the Georgia Watershed Information System (GWIS) and are publicly and freely available for downloading and analysis at www.georgiawis.org.
References
Alvarez-Vasquez, F., Sims, K.L., Cowart, L.A., Okamoto, Y., Voit, E.O., Hannun, Y.A.: Simulation and validation of modelled sphingolipid metabolism in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Nature 433, 425–430 (2005)
Beck, M.B.: The application of control and systems theory to problems of river pollution. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, UK (1973)
Beck, M.B.: Model structure identification from experimental data. In: Halfon, E. (ed.) Theoretical Systems Ecology: Advances and Case Studies, pp. 259–289. Academic, New York (1979)
Beck, M.B.: Uncertainty, system identification and the prediction of water quality. In: Beck, M.B., van Straten, G. (eds.) Uncertainty and Forecasting of Water Quality, pp. 3–68. Springer, Berlin (1983)
Beck, M.B.: Structures, failure, inference, and prediction. In: Barker, H.A., Young, P.C. (eds.) Identification and System Parameter Estimation, pp. 1443–1448. Pergamon, Oxford (1985)
Beck, M.B.: Water quality modeling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 23(8), 1393–1442 (1987)
Beck, M.B. (ed.): Environmental Foresight and Models: A Manifesto. Elsevier, Oxford (2002), 473Â pp.
Beck, M.B.: Model evaluation and performance. In: El-Shaarawi, A.H., Piegorsch, W.W. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, vol. 3, pp. 1275–1279. Wiley, Chichester (2002)
Beck, M.B.: Structural change: a definition. In: Beck, M.B. (ed.) Environmental Foresight and Models: A Manifesto, pp. 51–60. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)
Beck, M.B., Young, P.C.: Systematic identification of DO-BOD model structure. J. Environ. Eng. Div. 102(5), 909–927 (1976). Proceedings American Society of Civil Engineers
Beck, M.B., Stigter, J.D., Lloyd Smith, D.: D: Elasto-plastic deformation of the structure. In: Beck, M.B. (ed.) Environmental Foresight and Models: A Manifesto, pp. 323–350. Elsevier, Oxford (2002)
Beck, M.B., Gupta, H., Rastetter, E., Shoemaker, C., Tarboton, D., Butler, R., Edelson, D., Graber, H., Gross, L., Harmon, T., McLaughlin, D., Paola, C., Peters, D., Scavia, D., Schnoor, J.L., Weber, L.: Grand challenges of the future for environmental modeling. White Paper, National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia (2009) (ISBN: 978-1-61584-248-3)
Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M.: Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Holden Day, San Francisco (1970)
Brun, R., Reichert, P., Künsch, H.R.: Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models. Water Resour. Res. 37(4), 1015–1030 (2001)
Brun, R., Kühni, M., Siegrist, H., Gujer, W., Reichert, P.: Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters—systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Res. 36(16), 4113–4127 (2002)
Hunt, C.A., Ropella, G.E.P., Lam, T.N., Tang, J., Kim, S.H.J., Engelberg, J.A., Sheikh-Bahaei, S.: At the biological modeling and simulation frontier. Pharm. Res. 26(11), 2369–2400 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11095-009-9958-3
Lin, Z.: Modeling environmental systems under uncertainty: towards a synthesis of data-based and theory-based models. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia (2003)
Lin, Z., Beck, M.B.: On the identification of model structure in hydrological and environmental systems. Water Resour. Res. 43, W02402 (2007a). doi:10.1029/2005WR004796
Lin, Z., Beck, M.B.: Understanding complex environmental systems: a dual approach. Environmetrics 18(1), 11–26 (2007b)
Lin, Z., Beck, M.B.: Accounting for structural error and uncertainty in a model: An approach based on model parameters as stochastic processes. Environ. Model. Softw. (2010, in press)
Ljung, L.: Asymptotic behaviour of the extended Kalman filter as a parameter estimator. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 24, 36–50 (1979)
MacFarlane, A.G.J.: Interactive computing: a revolutionary medium for teaching and design. Comput. Control J. 1(4), 149–158 (1990)
Mooney, C.: Storm World—Hurricanes, Politics, and the Battle Over Global Warming. Harcourt, Orlando (2007)
NRC: Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington (2007), 267Â pp
NSF: Sensors for environmental observatories. Report of the NSF-sponsored Workshop, December 2004, National Science Foundation (2005), 64Â pp
NSF: Simulation-based engineering science: revolutionizing engineering science through simulation. Report of the National Science Foundation Blue Ribbon Panel, National Science Foundation (2006), 65Â pp
NSF: Cyber-enabled discovery and innovation (CDI). Program Solicitation NSF 07-603 (2007) (www.nsf.gov)
Norton, J.P.: Optimal smoothing in the identification of linear time-varying systems. Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 122, 663–668 (1975)
Omlin, M., Brun, R., Reichert, P.: Biogeochemical model of lake Zürich: sensitivity, identifiability and uncertainty analysis. Ecol. Model. 141(1–3), 105–123 (2001)
Oppenheimer, M., O’Neill, B.C., Webster, M., Agrawala, S.: The limits of consensus. Science 317, 1505–1506 (2007)
Petersen, B., Gernaey, K., Vanrolleghem, PA: Practical identifiability of model parameters by combined respirometric-titrimetric measurements. Water Sci. Technol. 43(7), 347–355 (2001)
Popper, K.R.: The Unending Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. Fontana-Collins, Glasgow (1976)
Raick, C., Soetart, K., Grégoire, M.: Model complexity and performance: how far can we simplify? Prog. Oceanogr. 70, 27–57 (2006)
Stigter, J.D.: The development and application of a continuous-discrete recursive prediction error algorithm in environmental systems analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia (1997)
Stigter, J.D., Beck, M.B.: On the development and application of a continuous-discrete recursive prediction error algorithm. Math. Biosci. 191(2), 143–158 (2004)
Stigter, J.D., Vries, D., Keesman, K.J.: On adaptive optimal input design: a bioreactor case study. AIChE J. 52(9), 3290–3296 (2006)
Tushingham, AM, Peltier, W.R.: Validation of the ICE-3G model of Würm-Wisconsin deglaciation using a global data base of relative sea level histories. J. Geophys. Res. 97(B3), 3285–3304 (1992)
Young, P.C.: Recursive Estimation and Time Series Analysis: An Introduction. Springer, New York (1984)
Young, P.C.: Data-based mechanistic modelling of environmental, ecological, economic and engineering systems. Environ. Model. Softw. 12, 105–122 (1998)
Young, P.C.: Nonstationary time series analysis and forecasting. Prog. Environ. Sci. 1, 3–48 (1999)
Young, P.C.: The identification and estimation of nonlinear stochastic systems. In: Mees, A.I. (ed.) Nonlinear Dynamics and Statistics, pp. 127–166. Birkhäuser, Boston (2001)
Young, P.C., Parkinson, S.: Simplicity out of complexity. In: Beck, M.B. (ed.) Environmental Foresight and Models: A Manifesto, pp. 251–301. Elsevier, Oxford (2002)
Young, P.C., Ratto, M.: A unified approach to environmental systems modeling. J. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 23, 1037–1057 (2009)
Acknowledgements
Support for this work has been provided over the decades by the University of Cambridge, the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Imperial College London, and the University of Georgia (UGA). In particular, funding for the Environmental Process Control Laboratory of UGA, together with support for graduate assistantships for ZL and JDS, has come from the Wheatley-Georgia Research Alliance endowed Chair in Water Quality and Environmental Systems. The freedom of enquiry enabled through this form of financial support has simply been invaluable. We are also indebted to J P Bond, for his visualization and graphic design of Figs. 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Personal Tribute to Professor Peter C. Young from the First Author (MBB).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beck, M.B., Lin, Z., Stigter, J.D. (2012). Model Structure Identification and the Growth of Knowledge. In: Wang, L., Garnier, H. (eds) System Identification, Environmental Modelling, and Control System Design. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-974-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-974-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-973-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-974-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)