Refined Instrumental Variable Methods for Hammerstein Box-Jenkins Models


This chapter presents an estimation method for Hammerstein models under colored added noise conditions. The proposed method is detailed for both continuous-time and discrete-time models and is based on the refined instrumental variable method. In order to use a regression form, the Hammerstein model is reformulated as an augmented multi-input-single-output linear time invariant model. The performance of the proposed methods are exposed through relevant Monte Carlo simulation examples.


Noise Model Monte Carlo Simulation Result Hammerstein Model Instrumental Variable Method Hammerstein System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Bai, E.-W.: A blind approach to the Hammerstein–Wiener model identification. Automatica 38(6), 967–979 (2002) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bai, E.-W.: Identification of linear systems with hard input nonlinearities of known structure. Automatica 38(5), 853–860 (2002) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bai, E.-W., Chan, K.-S.: Identification of an additive nonlinear system and its applications in generalized Hammerstein models. Automatica 44(2), 430–436 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bai, E.W.: An optimal two-stage identification algorithm for Hammerstein–Wiener nonlinear systems. Automatica 34(3), 333–338 (1998) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cerone, V., Regruto, D.: Parameter bounds for discrete-time Hammerstein models with bounded errors. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 48(10), 1855–1860 (2003) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding, F., Chen, T.: Identification of Hammerstein nonlinear ARMAX systems. Automatica 41(9), 1479–1489 (2005) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ding, F., Shi, Y., Chen, T.: Auxiliary model-based least-squares identification methods for Hammerstein output-error systems. Syst. Control Lett. 56(5), 373–380 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giri, F., Bai, E.-W. (eds.): Block-Oriented Nonlinear System Identification. Springer, London (2010) MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gillberg, J., Ljung, L.: Frequency domain identification of continuous-time ARMA models from sampled data. Automatica 45(6), 1371–1378 (2009) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gillberg, J., Ljung, L.: Frequency domain identification of continuous-time output error models, Part I: Uniformly sampled data and frequency function approximation. Automatica 46(1), 1–10 (2010) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gillberg, J., Ljung, L.: Frequency domain identification of continuous-time output error models, part II: Non-uniformly sampled data and B-spline output approximation. Automatica 46(1), 11–18 (2010) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilson, M., Garnier, H., Young, P.C., Van den Hof, P.: Refined instrumental variable methods for closed-loop system identification methods. In: Proceedings of the 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Saint-Malo, France (2009) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilson, M., Van den Hof, P.M.J.: Instrumental variable methods for closed-loop system identification. Automatica 41, 241–249 (2005) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greblicki, W.: Continuous-time Hammerstein system identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 45(6), 1232–1236 (2000) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garnier, H., Wang, L. (eds.): Identification of Continuous-Time Models from Sampled Data. Springer, London (2008) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johansson, R.: Identification of continuous-time models. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 42 (1994) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Laurain, V., Gilson, M., Garnier, H.: Refined instrumental variable methods for identifying Hammerstein models operating in closed loop. In: Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Shanghai, China (2009) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laurain, V., Gilson, M., Garnier, H., Young, P.C.: Refined instrumental variable methods for identification of Hammerstein continuous time Box-Jenkins models. In: Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun, Mexico (2008) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu, Y., Bai, E.W.: Iterative identification of Hammerstein systems. Automatica 43(2), 346–354 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ljung, L.: System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, New York (1999) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Palanthandalam-Madapusi, H.J., Edamana, B., Bernstein, D.S., Manchester, W., Ridley, A.J.: NARMAX identification for space weather prediction using polynomial radial basis functions. In: 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, USA (2007) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Patra, A., Unbehauen, H.: Identification of a class of nonlinear continuous-time systems using Hartley modulating functions. Int. J. Control 62(6), 1431–1451 (1995) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pintelon, R., Schoukens, J., Rolain, Y.: Box-Jenkins continuous-time modeling. Automatica 36 (2000) Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rao, G.P., Garnier, H.: Identification of continuous-time systems: direct or indirect? Syst. Sci. 30(3), 25–50 (2004) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rao, G.P., Unbehauen, H.: Identification of continuous-time systems. IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. 153(2) (2006) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schoukens, J., Widanage, W.D., Godfrey, K.R., Pintelon, R.: Initial estimates for the dynamics of a Hammerstein system. Automatica 43(7), 1296–1301 (2007) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vanbeylen, V., Pintelon, R., Schoukens, J.: Blind maximum likelihood identification of Hammerstein systems. Automatica 44(11), 3139–3146 (2008) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Ljung, L.: Revisiting Hammerstein system identification through the two-stage algorithm for bilinear parameter estimation. Automatica 45(9), 2627–2633 (2009) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Young, P.C.: Some observations on instrumental variable methods of time-series analysis. Int. J. Control 23, 593–612 (1976) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Young, P.C.: The refined instrumental variable method: unified estimation of discrete and continuous-time transfer function models. J. Eur. Syst. Autom. 42, 149–179 (2008) Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Young, P.C., Garnier, H., Gilson, M.: Refined instrumental variable identification of continous-time hybrid Box-Jenkins models. In: Garnier, H., Wang, L. (eds.) Identification of Continuous-Time Models from Sampled Data, pp. 91–131. Springer, London (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Young, P.C., Jakeman, A.: Refined instrumental variable methods of recursive time-series analysis—Part III. Extensions. Int. J. Control 31(4), 741–764 (1980) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhai, D., Rollins, D.K., Bhandari, N., Wu, H.: Continuous-time Hammerstein and Wiener modeling under second-order static nonlinearity for periodic process signals. Comput. Chem. Eng. 31, 1–12 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent Laurain
    • 1
  • Marion Gilson
    • 1
  • Hugues Garnier
    • 1
  1. 1.CNRSNancy-UniversitéVandoeuvre-lès-Nancy CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations