Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of identifying a state dependent input nonlinearity in a Data Based Mechanistic (DBM) flood forecasting model based on the data rather than some prior conceptualisation of nonlinearity in the system response. Four forms of nonlinear function are presented. A power law may be useful when the input non-linearity is simple. The Radial Basis Function (RBF) network method is appropriate for systems that exhibit well defined but complex input non-linearities. The Piecewise Cubic Hermite Data Interpolation (PCHIP) method also provides the flexibility to map complex input non-linearity shapes while providing the ability to maintain a natural curve. Overfit to the calibration data is a risk in both RBF and PCHIP methods when a large number of knots are used. The Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Inference method, together with interactive tuning, provides an alternative approach that allows human-in-the-loop interaction during the parameter estimation process but is not optimal in any statistical sense. Future work will explore the use of these methods with continuous time transfer functions and optimisation of the nonlinear function at the same time as the transfer function.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
A common addition to the scheme described above is an adaptive gain module. This module is not included in the results presented in this chapter but for completeness a brief description follows. An adaptive gain module assumes that the forecast value is scaled by a probabilistic, non-stationary gain whose value is conditioned by the mismatch between observed and forecast output. A NVR hyperparameter for the adaptive gain module determines how quickly the gain reacts to this mismatch. It is usual to set a low NVR value so that in operation the adaptive gain responds sluggishly and can correct for the slow accumulation of model error. This mechanism provides a simple means to correct for scenarios such as seasonal variation in catchment dynamics. Full details of the adaptive gain module can be found in Young [22].
References
Beven, K.: Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer. Wiley, New York (2001)
Colgan, L., Spence, R., Rankin, P.: The cockpit metaphor. Behav. Inf. Technol. 14(4), 251–263 (1995)
Cunge, J.A.: On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method). J. Hydraul. Res. 7(2), 205–230 (1969)
Dooge, J.C., Strupczewski, W.G., Napiorkowski, J.J.: Hydrodynamic derivation of storage parameters of the Muskingum model. J. Hydrol. 54(4), 371–387 (1982)
Fritsch, F.N., Carlson, R.E.: Monotone piecewise cubic interpolation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 17, 238–246 (1980)
Leedal, D., Beven, K.J., Young, P.C., Romanowicz, R.J.: Data assimilation and adaptive real-time forecasting of water levels in the Eden catchment, UK. In: Samuels, P., Huntington, S., Allsop, W., Harrop, J. (eds.) Flood Risk Management Research and Practice. Taylor and Francis, London (2008)
Lees, M., Young, P.C., Beven, K.J., Ferguson, S., Burns, J.: An adaptive flood warning system for the river Nith at Dumfries. In: White, W.R., Watts, J. (eds.) River Flood Hydraulics. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford (1994)
Nash, J.E.: A note on the Muskingham flood routing method. J. Geophys. Res. 64, 1053–1056 (1959)
Pappenberger, F., Beven, K.J., Hunter, N., Gouweleeuw, B., Bates, P., de Roo, A.: Cascading model uncertainty from medium range weather forecasts (10 days) through a rainfall-runoff model to flood inundation predictions within the European flood forecasting system (EFFS). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 9(4), 1430–1449 (2005)
Park, J., Swandberg, I.W.: Universal approximation using radial-basis-function networks. Neural Comput. 3(2), 246–257 (1991)
Pielke, R.A. Jr., Pielke, R.A. Sr.: Hurricanes: Their Nature and Impacts on Society. Wiley, New York (1997)
Ratto, M., Young, P.C., Romanowicz, R., Pappenberger, F., Saltelli, Pagano A.: Uncertainty, sensitivity analysis and the role of data based mechanistic modeling in hydrology. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11, 1249–1266 (2007)
Romanowicz, R.J., Young, P.C., Beven, K.J.: Data assimilation and adaptive forecasting of water levels in the river Severn catchment, United Kingdom. Water Resour. Res. 42, W06407 (2006)
Romanowicz, R.J., Young, P.C., Beven, K.J., Pappenberger, F.: A data based mechanistic approach to nonlinear flood routing and adaptive flood level forecasting. Adv. Water Resour. 31(8), 1048–1056 (2008)
Sherman, L.K.: Streamflow from rainfall by the unit-hydrograph method. Eng. News-Rec. 108, 501–505 (1932)
Smith, P., Beven, K.J., Tych, W., Hughes, D., Coulson, G., Blair, G.: The provision of site specific flood warnings using wireless sensor networks. In: Samuels, P., Huntington, S., Allsop, W., Harrop, J. (eds.) Flood Risk Management Research and Practice. Taylor and Francis, London (2008)
Young, P.C.: Recursive approaches to time-series analysis. Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. 10, 209–224 (1974)
Young, P.C.: Recursive Estimation and Time-Series Analysis. Springer, Berlin (1984)
Young, P.C.: Time variable and state dependent modelling of nonstationary and nonlinear time series. In: Subba Rao, T. (ed.) Developments in Time Series Analysis, pp. 374–413. Chapman and Hall, London (1993)
Young, P.C.: Data-based mechanistic modelling and validation of rainfall-flow processes. In: Anderson, M.G., Bates, P.D. (eds.) Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science, pp. 117–161. Wiley, Chichester (2001)
Young, P.C.: The identification and estimation of nonlinear stochastic systems. In: Mees, A.I. (ed.) Nonlinear Dynamics and Statistics, pp. 127–166. Birkhäuser, Boston (2001)
Young, P.C.: Advances in real-time flood forecasting. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 360(1796), 1433–1450 (2002)
Young, P.C., Beven, K.J.: Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments comment. J. Hydrol. 129(1–4), 389–396 (1991)
Young, P.C., Beven, K.J.: Data-based mechanistic (DBM) modelling and the rainfall-flow nonlinearity. Environmetrics 5, 335–363 (1994)
Young, P.C.: Top-down and data-based mechanistic modelling of rainfall-flow dynamics at the catchment scale. Hydrol. Process. 17, 2195–2217 (2003)
Young, P.C., Garnier, H.: Identification and estimation of continuous-time data-based mechanistic (DBM) models for environmental systems. Environ. Model. Softw. 21(8), 1055–1072 (2006)
Young, P.C., Castelletti, A., Pianosi, F.: The data-based mechanistic approach in hydrological modelling. In: Castelletti, A., Sessa, R.S. (eds.) Topics on System Analysis and Integrated Water Resource Management, pp. 27–48. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
Young, P.C.: Real-time updating in flood forecasting and warning. In: Pender, G.J., Faulkner, H. (eds.) Flood Risk Science and Management, Oxford, UK, pp. 163–195. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2010)
Young, P.C.: Gauss, Kalman and advances in recursive parameter estimation. J. Forecast. 30, 104–146 (2010) (special issue celebrating 50 years of the Kalman Filter)
Acknowledgements
This research was carried out as part of RPA9 and SWP1 of the Flood Risk Management Research Consortium (FRMRC) phases 1 and 2. The principal sponsors of FRMRC are: the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) in collaboration with the Environment Agency (EA), the Northern Ireland Rivers Agency (DARDNI), the United Kingdom Water Industry Research (UKWIR) Organisation, the Scottish Government (via SNIFFER), the Welsh Assembly Government (WAG) through the auspices of the Defra/EA, and the Office of Public Works (OPW) in the Republic of Ireland. For details of the FRMRC, see http://www.floodrisk.org.uk.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beven, K.J., Leedal, D.T., Smith, P.J., Young, P.C. (2012). Identification and Representation of State Dependent Non-linearities in Flood Forecasting Using the DBM Methodology. In: Wang, L., Garnier, H. (eds) System Identification, Environmental Modelling, and Control System Design. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-974-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-974-1_17
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-973-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-974-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)