Skip to main content

Medical Bibliographic Databases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computer Medical Databases

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

  • 1060 Accesses

Abstract

Bibliographic databases function like the large card catalogs that were established by librarians to identify, describe, index, and classify citations, journals, and books, so that they could be effectively stored, retrieved, and used when needed. The user of an automated medical bibliographic database can enter a query into a search and retrieval program using a defined set of terms; and all citations that were indexed by these terms can then be retrieved. Bibliographic databases are primarily fact locators that point to information found elsewhere. Factual databases, like those of the NLM’s Hazardous Substance Data Bank (HSDB), its Genetics Sequence Data Bank (GenBank), and its Physicians’ Data Query (PDQ) are bibliographic databases that contain information on specific subjects, and are primarily fact providers.

(Note: Unless otherwise referenced, much of the information about NLM in this chapter has been obtained from its annually published National Library of Medicine Programs and Services, its periodically published NLM News and NLM Fact Sheets, and from NLM’s internet Web sites. National Library of Medicine (NLM) Fact Sheets are accessible through nlm.nih.gov.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman MJ. The Visible Human Project of the National Library of Medicine. MEDINFO. 1992;366–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman MJ. The Visible Human Project; a resource for anatomical visualization. MEDINFO. 1998;1030–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin CJ. MEDLARS 1963–1967. PHS Pub No. 1823. Washington, D.C.:US Government Print Office, HEW, NLM. 1968;1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake JB. From surgeon general’s bookshelf to National Library of Medicine: a brief history. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986;74:318–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brahmi FA. MEDLINE retrieval: Grateful Med, Paperchase, and Physician’s Online. Proc AMIA. 1995;928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings MM, Mehnert RB. MEDLARS services at the National Library of Medicine: public service or market commodity. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:772–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeBakey ME. The National Library of Medicine: evolution of a premier information center. JAMA. 1991;266:1252–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doszkocs TE, Rapp BA, Schoolman HM. Automated information retrieval in science and technology. Science 1980;208(Apr 4):25-30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doszkocs TE. CITE NLM: natural-language searching in an online-catalog. Inf Technol Libr. 1983;2:364–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esterhay RJ. The technology of PDQ. Proc SCAMC. 1984;361–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinglos SJ. MEDLINE at BRS, DIALOG, and NLM: is there a choice? Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1983;71:6–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foote J. John Shaw Billings: a 19th-century information-age planner. Cite AB. 1994(June 13);2620–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling IC, Solomon SS, Bryer-Ash M. Genomes, transcriptomes, and proteomes. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:190–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Fitzgerald D, et al. How to keep up with the medical literature: IV. Using the literature to solve clinical problems. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105:636–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hersh W, Hickam D. Information retrieval in medicine: the SAPHIRE experience. Proc MEDINFO. 95:1433–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz GL, Bleich HL. PaperChase: a computer program to search the medical literature. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:924–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz GL, Jackson JD, Bleich HL. Paperchase: self-service bibliographic retrieval. JAMA. 1983;250:2494–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard SM, Henney JE, DeVita VT. A computer data base for information on cancer treatment. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:315–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB. Building the Unified Medical Language System. Proc SCAMC. 1989;473–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB, Hole WT. Assessing and enhancing the value of the UMLS knowledge sources. Proc AMIA. 1992;78–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys BL, Hole WT, McCray AT, Fitzmaurice JM. Planned NLM/AHCPR large-scale vocabulary test: using UMLS technology to determine the extent to which controlled vocabularies cover terminology needed for health care and public health. JAMIA. 1996;3:281–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB, Schoolman HM, Barnett GO. The unified medical language system: an informatics research collaboration. JAMIA. 1998;5:1–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps GL The role of PDQ in disseminating cancer information. Proc MEDINFO. 1986;503–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster FW. Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system. JAMA. 1969;207:114–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg DA. University of Missouri-Columbia. In: Lindberg DAB, editor. The growth of medical information systems in the United States, Chap 2. Lexington: Lexington Books; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg DAB. Introduction. In: Broering NC, editor. Symposium on Integrated Academic Information Management Systems (IAIMS). Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1988;76:224–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg DAB. Global information infrastructure. Int J BioMed Comput. 1994;34:13–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg DAB. Medical computing high and low. JAMIA. 1995;2:337–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg DAB, Schoolman HM. The National Library of Medicine and medical informatics. West J Med. 1986;145:786–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL. The UMLS knowledge sources: tools for building better user interfaces. Proc SCAMC. 1990;121–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) and computer-based patient records. In: Ball MJ, Collen MF, editors. Aspects of the computer-based patient record. New York: Springer; 1992. p. 165–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL. The high performance computing and communications program, the National Information Infrastructure, and Health Care. JAMIA. 1995;2:156–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The unified medical language system. Methods Inf Med. 1993;32:281–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe HJ, Barnett GO. Understanding and using the Medical Subjects Headings (MeSH) vocabulary to perform literature searches. JAMA. 1994;271:1103–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lunin LF, Moerman M. Challenges and opportunities in joining a national Combined Health Information Database (CHID). Proc SCAMC. 1984;337–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchisotto R, Walsh JA. A comprehensive biomedical information system. Proc MEDINFO. 1983;1983:917–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson NW. Introduction. In: Broering NC, editor. Symposium 0n Integrated Academic Information Management Systems (IAIMS). Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1988;76:222.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCray AT. The UMLS semantic network. Proc SCAMC. 1989;503–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCray AT. Extending a natural language parser with UMLS knowledge. Proc SCAMC. 1992;194–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCray AT. ASN.1: defining a grammar for the UMLS knowledge sources. Proc SCAMC. 1995;868–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCray AT. The nature of lexical knowledge. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37:353–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCray AT, Razi AM, Bangolore AK, et al. The UMLS knowledge source server: a versatile Internet-based research tool. Proc SCAMC. 1996;164–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCray AT, Bodenreider O, Malley JD, Browne AC. Evaluating UMLS strings for natural language processing. Proc AMIA. 2001;448–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKusick VA. Mendelian inheritance in man; catalog of autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked phenotypes. 8th ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz B. 700 genes mapped at world workshop. JAMA. 1989;262:175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miles WD. A history of the National Library of Medicine; The Nations Treasury of Medical Knowledge. NIH Pub. No. 82-1904. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • NLM’s MEDLINE Logs Ten Millionth Journal Citation; NLM’s NEWSLINE 1999;54­(Apr-Sep); 2+3:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pao ML, Grefsheim SF, Barclay ML, et al. Factors affecting students’ use of MEDLINE. Comput Biomed Res. 1993;26:541–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rada R, Calhoun E, Mill H, et al. A medical information thesaurus. Proc MEDINFO. 1986;1164–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodnick JE. The most important computer tool in medical practice – online searching. NLM News. 1988(Apr-May):6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KA. The National Library of Medicine: from MEDLARS to the sesquicentennial and beyond. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986;74:325–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer V, Ackerman MJ, Scherzinger AL, Whitlock D. The visible human male: a technical report. JAMIA. 1996;3:118–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson J. Scientists revel in new research tool: an online index of cancer genes. JAMA. 1997;278:1221–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swyers JP. Genetic data base service. Research Resources Reporter. 1989(Dec);13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taine SI. The medical literature analysis and retrieval system (MEDLARS) of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Method Inf Med. 1963;2:65–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Underhill LH, Bleich HL. Bringing the medical literature to physicians. West J Med. 1986;145:853–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venter JC. Shotgun sequencing in a life decoded: my genome: my life, Chap 9. New York: Viking Press; 2007. p. 189–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallingford KT, Humphreys BL, Selinger NE, Siegel ER. Bibliographic retrieval: a survey of individual users of MEDLINE. MD Comput. 1990;7:166–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood EH. MEDLINE: the options for health professionals. JAMIA. 1994;1:372–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood FB, Cid VH, Siegel ER. Evaluating Internet end-to-end performance. JAMIA. 1996;5:528–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooster H. Biomedical communications, Chap 7, in Ann Rev Inform Sciences. Am Soc Inform Sci 1981:187–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelingher J. Exploring the Internet. MD Comput. 1995;12:100–8. 144.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collen, M.F. (2012). Medical Bibliographic Databases. In: Computer Medical Databases. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-962-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-962-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-961-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-962-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics