Abstract
Bibliographic databases function like the large card catalogs that were established by librarians to identify, describe, index, and classify citations, journals, and books, so that they could be effectively stored, retrieved, and used when needed. The user of an automated medical bibliographic database can enter a query into a search and retrieval program using a defined set of terms; and all citations that were indexed by these terms can then be retrieved. Bibliographic databases are primarily fact locators that point to information found elsewhere. Factual databases, like those of the NLM’s Hazardous Substance Data Bank (HSDB), its Genetics Sequence Data Bank (GenBank), and its Physicians’ Data Query (PDQ) are bibliographic databases that contain information on specific subjects, and are primarily fact providers.
(Note: Unless otherwise referenced, much of the information about NLM in this chapter has been obtained from its annually published National Library of Medicine Programs and Services, its periodically published NLM News and NLM Fact Sheets, and from NLM’s internet Web sites. National Library of Medicine (NLM) Fact Sheets are accessible through nlm.nih.gov.)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackerman MJ. The Visible Human Project of the National Library of Medicine. MEDINFO. 1992;366–70.
Ackerman MJ. The Visible Human Project; a resource for anatomical visualization. MEDINFO. 1998;1030–2.
Austin CJ. MEDLARS 1963–1967. PHS Pub No. 1823. Washington, D.C.:US Government Print Office, HEW, NLM. 1968;1–68.
Blake JB. From surgeon general’s bookshelf to National Library of Medicine: a brief history. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986;74:318–24.
Brahmi FA. MEDLINE retrieval: Grateful Med, Paperchase, and Physician’s Online. Proc AMIA. 1995;928.
Cummings MM, Mehnert RB. MEDLARS services at the National Library of Medicine: public service or market commodity. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:772–4.
DeBakey ME. The National Library of Medicine: evolution of a premier information center. JAMA. 1991;266:1252–8.
Doszkocs TE, Rapp BA, Schoolman HM. Automated information retrieval in science and technology. Science 1980;208(Apr 4):25-30.
Doszkocs TE. CITE NLM: natural-language searching in an online-catalog. Inf Technol Libr. 1983;2:364–80.
Esterhay RJ. The technology of PDQ. Proc SCAMC. 1984;361–4.
Feinglos SJ. MEDLINE at BRS, DIALOG, and NLM: is there a choice? Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1983;71:6–12.
Foote J. John Shaw Billings: a 19th-century information-age planner. Cite AB. 1994(June 13);2620–30.
Gerling IC, Solomon SS, Bryer-Ash M. Genomes, transcriptomes, and proteomes. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:190–8.
Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Fitzgerald D, et al. How to keep up with the medical literature: IV. Using the literature to solve clinical problems. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105:636–40.
Hersh W, Hickam D. Information retrieval in medicine: the SAPHIRE experience. Proc MEDINFO. 95:1433–7.
Horowitz GL, Bleich HL. PaperChase: a computer program to search the medical literature. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:924–30.
Horowitz GL, Jackson JD, Bleich HL. Paperchase: self-service bibliographic retrieval. JAMA. 1983;250:2494–9.
Hubbard SM, Henney JE, DeVita VT. A computer data base for information on cancer treatment. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:315–8.
Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB. Building the Unified Medical Language System. Proc SCAMC. 1989;473–89.
Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB, Hole WT. Assessing and enhancing the value of the UMLS knowledge sources. Proc AMIA. 1992;78–82.
Humphreys BL, Hole WT, McCray AT, Fitzmaurice JM. Planned NLM/AHCPR large-scale vocabulary test: using UMLS technology to determine the extent to which controlled vocabularies cover terminology needed for health care and public health. JAMIA. 1996;3:281–7.
Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB, Schoolman HM, Barnett GO. The unified medical language system: an informatics research collaboration. JAMIA. 1998;5:1–11.
Kreps GL The role of PDQ in disseminating cancer information. Proc MEDINFO. 1986;503–6.
Lancaster FW. Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system. JAMA. 1969;207:114–20.
Lindberg DA. University of Missouri-Columbia. In: Lindberg DAB, editor. The growth of medical information systems in the United States, Chap 2. Lexington: Lexington Books; 1979.
Lindberg DAB. Introduction. In: Broering NC, editor. Symposium on Integrated Academic Information Management Systems (IAIMS). Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1988;76:224–5.
Lindberg DAB. Global information infrastructure. Int J BioMed Comput. 1994;34:13–9.
Lindberg DAB. Medical computing high and low. JAMIA. 1995;2:337–41.
Lindberg DAB, Schoolman HM. The National Library of Medicine and medical informatics. West J Med. 1986;145:786–90.
Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL. The UMLS knowledge sources: tools for building better user interfaces. Proc SCAMC. 1990;121–5.
Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) and computer-based patient records. In: Ball MJ, Collen MF, editors. Aspects of the computer-based patient record. New York: Springer; 1992. p. 165–75.
Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL. The high performance computing and communications program, the National Information Infrastructure, and Health Care. JAMIA. 1995;2:156–9.
Lindberg DAB, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The unified medical language system. Methods Inf Med. 1993;32:281–91.
Lowe HJ, Barnett GO. Understanding and using the Medical Subjects Headings (MeSH) vocabulary to perform literature searches. JAMA. 1994;271:1103–8.
Lunin LF, Moerman M. Challenges and opportunities in joining a national Combined Health Information Database (CHID). Proc SCAMC. 1984;337–40.
Marchisotto R, Walsh JA. A comprehensive biomedical information system. Proc MEDINFO. 1983;1983:917–20.
Matheson NW. Introduction. In: Broering NC, editor. Symposium 0n Integrated Academic Information Management Systems (IAIMS). Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1988;76:222.
McCray AT. The UMLS semantic network. Proc SCAMC. 1989;503–7.
McCray AT. Extending a natural language parser with UMLS knowledge. Proc SCAMC. 1992;194–8.
McCray AT. ASN.1: defining a grammar for the UMLS knowledge sources. Proc SCAMC. 1995;868–72.
McCray AT. The nature of lexical knowledge. Methods Inf Med. 1998;37:353–60.
McCray AT, Razi AM, Bangolore AK, et al. The UMLS knowledge source server: a versatile Internet-based research tool. Proc SCAMC. 1996;164–8.
McCray AT, Bodenreider O, Malley JD, Browne AC. Evaluating UMLS strings for natural language processing. Proc AMIA. 2001;448–52.
McKusick VA. Mendelian inheritance in man; catalog of autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked phenotypes. 8th ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1988.
Merz B. 700 genes mapped at world workshop. JAMA. 1989;262:175.
Miles WD. A history of the National Library of Medicine; The Nations Treasury of Medical Knowledge. NIH Pub. No. 82-1904. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1982.
NLM’s MEDLINE Logs Ten Millionth Journal Citation; NLM’s NEWSLINE 1999;54Â(Apr-Sep); 2+3:2.
Pao ML, Grefsheim SF, Barclay ML, et al. Factors affecting students’ use of MEDLINE. Comput Biomed Res. 1993;26:541–55.
Rada R, Calhoun E, Mill H, et al. A medical information thesaurus. Proc MEDINFO. 1986;1164–70.
Rodnick JE. The most important computer tool in medical practice – online searching. NLM News. 1988(Apr-May):6–7.
Smith KA. The National Library of Medicine: from MEDLARS to the sesquicentennial and beyond. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1986;74:325–32.
Spitzer V, Ackerman MJ, Scherzinger AL, Whitlock D. The visible human male: a technical report. JAMIA. 1996;3:118–30.
Stephenson J. Scientists revel in new research tool: an online index of cancer genes. JAMA. 1997;278:1221–4.
Swyers JP. Genetic data base service. Research Resources Reporter. 1989(Dec);13–14.
Taine SI. The medical literature analysis and retrieval system (MEDLARS) of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Method Inf Med. 1963;2:65–9.
Underhill LH, Bleich HL. Bringing the medical literature to physicians. West J Med. 1986;145:853–8.
Venter JC. Shotgun sequencing in a life decoded: my genome: my life, Chap 9. New York: Viking Press; 2007. p. 189–215.
Wallingford KT, Humphreys BL, Selinger NE, Siegel ER. Bibliographic retrieval: a survey of individual users of MEDLINE. MD Comput. 1990;7:166–71.
Wood EH. MEDLINE: the options for health professionals. JAMIA. 1994;1:372–80.
Wood FB, Cid VH, Siegel ER. Evaluating Internet end-to-end performance. JAMIA. 1996;5:528–45.
Wooster H. Biomedical communications, Chap 7, in Ann Rev Inform Sciences. Am Soc Inform Sci 1981:187–223.
Zelingher J. Exploring the Internet. MD Comput. 1995;12:100–8. 144.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Collen, M.F. (2012). Medical Bibliographic Databases. In: Computer Medical Databases. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-962-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-962-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-961-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-962-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)