Advertisement

Secondary Medical Research Databases

  • Morris F. Collen
Chapter
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

Secondary medical databases are classified in this book in accordance with their objectives, which usually are to support clinical research, administrative functions, medical education, or public health. Since very large medical databases can collect, integrate, store, and provide data from various sources and can support multiple purposes, they can serve both as a primary databases if the data are initially collected for direct patient care, and can also serve as secondary databases when the data are also used for other purposes (Glichlich 2007). After primary medical databases began to be established in the 1960s, it soon became evident that the secondary collections of information extracted from primary clinical databases could be of great value in supporting clinical research, improving the clinical decision-making process, and improving the quality of health care. As computer storage devices became larger and less costly, a great variety of secondary clinical databases emerged in these six decades.

Keywords

Research Database Common Gateway Interface Common Information Model National Clinical Database Identifiable Health Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Basmajian D. The center for health services research. Oakland: Kaiser Permanente. Spectrum. 1989;(fall):1–2.Google Scholar
  2. Blois MS. Medical records and clinical databases: what is the difference. Proc AMIA Cong. 1982:86–9.Google Scholar
  3. Brandt CA, Sun K, Charpentier P, Nadkarni PK. Integration of web-based and PC-based clinical research databases. Methods Inf Med. 2004;43:287–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cimino JJ, McNamara TJ, Meridith T, et al. Evaluation of a proposed method for representing drug terminology. Proc AMIA. 1999:47–1.Google Scholar
  5. Davies AR. Health care researchers’ needs for computer-based patient records. In: Ball MF, Collen MF, editors. Aspects of the computer-based patient record. New York: Springer; 1992. p. 46–56.Google Scholar
  6. Detmer WM, Shortliffe EH. A model of clinical query management that supports integration of biomedical information over the World Wide Web. Proc SCAMC. 1995:898–2.Google Scholar
  7. Entine SM. Wisconsin storage and retrieval system: a data management system for a clinical cancer center. Proc SCAMC. 1982:813–7.Google Scholar
  8. Fienberg SF, Martin ME, Straf ML, National Research Council, Committee on National Statistics, editors. Sharing research data. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1985.Google Scholar
  9. Frey R, Girardi S, Wiederhold G. A filing system for medical research. Journees D’Informatique Medicale. 1970: 511–6.Google Scholar
  10. Friedlin FJ, McDonald CJ. A software tool for removing patient identification information from clinical documents. JAMIA. 2008;15:601–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Garfolo BT, Keltner L. A computerized disease register. Proc MEDINFO. 1983:909–2.Google Scholar
  12. Glichlich RE, Dreyer NA, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. AHRQ Pub. # 07-EHC001-1. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007(Apr):1–233.Google Scholar
  13. Gordis L, Gold E. Privacy, confidentiality, and the use of medical records in research. Science. 1980;207:153–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrmann FR, Safran C. Exploring a hospital-wide database: integrating statistical functions with ClinQuery. Proc AMIA. 1992:583–7.Google Scholar
  15. Hlatky M. Using databases to evaluate therapy. Stat Med. 1991;10:647–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hripcsak G, Cimino JJ, Sengupta S. WebCis: large scale deployment of a Web-based clinical information system. Proc AMIA. 1999:804–8.Google Scholar
  17. Kohane IS, van Wingerde FJ, Fackler JC, et al. Sharing electronic medical records across multiple heterogenous and competing insitutions. Proc AMIA. 1996:608–2.Google Scholar
  18. Kurreeman F, Liao K, Chibnik L, et al. Genetic basis of autoantibody positive and negative rheumatoid arthritis risk in a multi-ethnic cohort derived from electronic health records. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:57–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Logan JR, Britell S, Delcambre LM, et al. Representing multi-database study schemas for reusability. Proc STB. 2010:21–5.Google Scholar
  20. Loukides G, Denny JC, Malin B. The disclosure of diagnosis codes can breach research participant’s privacy. JAMIA. 2010a;17:322–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Loukides G, Gkoulalas-Divanis A, Malin B. Anonymization of electronic records for validating genome-wide associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010b;107:898–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGuire AL, Fisher R, Cusenza P, et al. Confidentiality, privacy, and security of genetic and genomic test information in electronic health records: points to consider. Genet Med. 2008;10:495–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mirel BR, Wright Z, Tenenbaum JD, et al. User requirements for exploring a resource inventory for clinical research. Proc AMIA CRI. 2010:31–5.Google Scholar
  24. Nadkarni PM, Brandt CM, Marenco L. WebEAV: automatic meta-driven generation of web interfaces to entity-attribute-value-databases. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:343–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niland JC, Rouse L. Clinical research needs, Chap 3. In: Lehman HP, Abbott PA, Roderer NK, editors. Aspects of electronic health record systems. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 31–46.Google Scholar
  26. Porter D, Safran C. On-line searches of a hospital data base for clinical research and patient care. Proc SCAMC. 1984:277–9.Google Scholar
  27. Pryor DB, Califf RM, Harrell FE, et al. Clinical data bases: accomplishments and unrealized potential. Med Care. 1985;23:623–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Safran C. Using routinely collected data for clinical research. Stat Med. 1991;10:559–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Safran C, Porter D. New uses of a large clinical database. In: Orthner HF, Blum BI, editors. Implementing health care information systems. New York: Springer; 1989. p. 123–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Safran C, Porter D. New uses of the large clinical data base at the Beth Israel Hospital in Boston. Proc SCAMC. 1986:114–9.Google Scholar
  31. Safran C, Chute CG. Exploration and exploitation of clinical databases. Int J Biomed Comput. 1995;39:151–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Safran C, Rury CD, Lightfoot J, Porter D. ClinQuery: a program for interactive searching of clinical data. Proc SCAMC. 1989:414–8.Google Scholar
  33. Safran C, Porter D, Rury CD, et al. ClinQuery: searching a large clinical database. MD Comput. 1990;7:144–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schoenberg R, Schoenberg I, Safran C. An object-oriented tool for clinical queries. Proc AMIA. 2000:1130.Google Scholar
  35. Shortliffe EH, Barnett GO, Cimino JJ, et al. Collaborative medical informatics research using the Internet and the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA. 1996:125–9.Google Scholar
  36. Sittig DF, Kuperman GL, Teich JM. WWW-based interfaces to clinical information systems: the state of the art. Proc AMIA. 1996:694–8.Google Scholar
  37. Sweeney L. Replacing personally-identifying information in medical records, the Scrub system. Proc AMIA. 1996:333–7.Google Scholar
  38. Sweeney L. Guaranteeing anonymity when sharing medical data, the Datafly system. Proc AMIA. 1997:333–7Google Scholar
  39. Sweeney L. k-Anonymity: a model for ting privacy. Int J Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge based Syst. 2002;10:557–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Wingerde FJ, Schindler J, Kilbridge P, et al. Using HL7 and the World Wide Web for unifying patient data from remote databases. Proc AMIA. 1996:643–7.Google Scholar
  41. Weber GM, Murphy SN, McMurry AJ, et al. The shared health research information network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories. JAMA. 2009;16:624–30.Google Scholar
  42. Wyatt M, Robinson J, Gordon G, et al. DASI – a federated data access and sharing initiative. Proc AMIA STB. 2010:122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morris F. Collen
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of ResearchOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations