Advertisement

The Role of the Enhanced Recovery Facilitator

  • Jane P. Bradley Hendricks
  • Fiona Carter
Chapter
Part of the Enhanced Recovery book series (ER)

Abstract

The key to ensuring successful implementation of enhanced recovery is engagement, commitment and involvement of the multidisciplinary team across the local health community. Enhanced recovery (ER) will fail without teamwork and the role of the ER facilitator is paramount to the success of the programme [1]. The ER facilitator must have access to all the key members of the team and be able to convince reluctant colleagues of the importance of change. Since this ER programme crosses all areas of the patient journey, the facilitator will need to have a good understanding of the issues related to each aspect of care. The role of the facilitator is not to give the care at each patient episode but to oversee the programme and ensure that it is carried out in each department.

Keywords

Anastomotic Leak Ward Round Patient Journey Enhance Recovery Programme Consultant Anaesthetist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Evans J, Kennedy RH. Enhanced recovery after surgery, chapter 12. In: Kingsnorth AN, Bowley DM, editors. Fundamentals of surgical practice: a preparation guide for the MRCS intercollegiate exam. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carter F. Achieving widespread adoption of colorectal enhanced recovery in England: learning from the current UK centres. Discussion document for enhanced recovery partnership programme, July 2009. http://www.enhancedrecoveryhub/2112.html. Accessed 4 May 2011.
  3. 3.
    On-line resources to support spread and adoption of enhanced recovery provided by the UK Department of Health. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Electivecare/Enhancedrecovery/DH_115706
  4. 4.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Surgical care – how can new evidence be applied to clinical practice. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(1):2–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg. 2007;94:224–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N, Vinall NS, Eyre-Brook IA. A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;245(6):867–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pattison R. The effect of ward design on the well being of post-operative patients. J Adv Nurs. 1996;23:820–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polle SW, Wind J, Fuhring J, Hofland J, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA. Implementation of a fast-track perioperative care programme: what are the difficulties? Dig Surg. 2007;24:441–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jottard KJC, Van Berlo C, Jeuken L, Dejong C. Changes in outcome during implementation of a fast-track colonic surgery project in a university-affiliated general teaching hospital. Advantages reached with ERAS over a 1-year period. Dig Surg. 2008;25:335–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryColchester General HospitalColchester, EssexUK
  2. 2.Yeovil AcademyYeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation TrustYeovil, SomersetUK

Personalised recommendations