Advertisement

Success and Failure in Colorectal Enhanced Recovery

  • Nader Francis
  • Andrew Allison
  • Jonathan Ockrim
Chapter
Part of the Enhanced Recovery book series (ER)

Abstract

Enhanced recovery (ER) after surgery programmes should succeed in improving the quality of care and reducing the length of stay for the majority of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. A minority of patients however are perceived to fail by these measures and it is in these patients that we see some of the challenges and limitations faced by ER programmes.

Keywords

Epidural Analgesia Enhance Recovery After Surgery Anastomotic Dehiscence Enhance Recovery Programme Enhance Recovery After Surgery Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, et al. Syste­matic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2006; 93(7):800–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Aarts MA, Okrainec A, McLeod RS. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(12):2321–9. Epub 2009 May 21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walter CJ, Collin J, Dumville JC, Drew PJ, Monson JR. Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(4):344–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(4):434–40. Epub 2010 Jan 29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbølle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg. 2000;232(1):51–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94(2):224–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, Strik C, Groenewoud JJ, Brinkert W, van Laarhoven CJ, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus conventional postoperative care in colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(1):88–95. Epub 2009 Sep 25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N, Vinall NS, Eyre-Brook IA. A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;245(6):867–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marret E, Remy C, Bonnet F, Postoperative Pain Forum Group. Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94(6):665–73. Review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jørgensen H, Wetterslev J, Møiniche S, Dahl JB. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis. PONV and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;4:CD001893. Review.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR, Perkins AC, Rowlands BJ, Allison SP. Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9320):1812–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller J. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3:CD003145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schwenk W, Böhm B, Haase O, Junghans T, Müller JM. Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383(1):49–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raue W, Haase O, Junghans T, Scharfenberg M, Müller JM, Schwenk W. ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(10):1463–8. Epub 2004 Aug 26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    MacKay G, Ihedioha U, McConnachie A, Serpell M, Molloy RG, O’Dwyer PJ. Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(4):368–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, Billesbølle P, Lund C, Mogensen T, et al. Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg. 2005;241(3):416–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khan S, Wilson T, Ahmed J, Owais A, MacFie J. Quality of life and patient satisfaction with enhanced recovery protocols. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(12):1175–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J, et al. Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):571–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smart NJ, Brigic A, Ockrim J, Allison AS, Kennedy RH, Francis NK. Factors influencing deviation and failure from enhanced recovery protocol following laparoscopic colorectal resections: what lessons can we learn? Association of coloproctology meeting, Birmingham, 20–23 June 2011.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brigic A, Smart NJ, Ockrim J, Kennedy RH, Francis NK. Deviations from enhanced recovery protocols following laparoscopic colorectal resections’. International surgical congress of association of surgeons of GB&I 2011, Bournemouth, 11–13 May 2011.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boulind C, Smart N, Brigic A, Pring T, Ockrim J, Kennedy RH, Francis N. Operative factors that predict outcome in enhanced recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. 19th international congress of the European association of endoscopic surgeons, Torino, 15–18 June 2011.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burkill C, Boulind C, Noble H, Allison A, Ockrim J, Kennedy RH, Francis NK. Factors predict outcome in enhanced recovery programme following laparoscopic colorectal resection: multi-variant analysis. The association of surgeons of GB & I, Glasgow, May 2009.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laparoscopic surgery: failure to recognise post-operative deterioration. National patient safety agency –NHS. National reporting and learning service. Central Alert System (CAS) reference: NPSA/2010/RRR016 23 September 2010 www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources.
  24. 24.
    Noble EJ, Harris R, Hosie KB, Thomas S, Lewis SJ. Gum chewing reduces postoperative ileus? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2009;7(2):100–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Traut U, Brügger L, Kunz R, Pauli-Magnus C, Haug K, Bucher H and Koller, MT. “Cochrane database of systematic reviews.” Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD004930.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boulind C, Yeo M, Burkill C, Witt A, James E, Ewings P, Kennedy RH, Francis N. Factors predicting deviation from an enhanced recovery programme and delayed discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal disease 2011 in press.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nader Francis
    • 1
  • Andrew Allison
    • 1
  • Jonathan Ockrim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryYeovil District HospitalYeovil, SomersetUK
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryYeovil District Hospital, NHS Foundation TrustYeovil, SomersetUK

Personalised recommendations