Advertisement

Coronary Artery Evaluation

  • Michael Katz
  • Blake Gardner
  • John P. Gassler
Chapter

Abstract

For centuries the coronary arteries have been known to medical practitioners only from cadaveric anatomic evaluations while in training. In living patients with chest pain syndromes they remained hidden, protected like “crown jewels”, akin to that from which their names derives from the Latin “corōnārius” meaning “belonging to a wreath or crown”. Though the understanding of the dual circulation of the body had been unraveled over the preceding centuries, the main use of catheters had been in animal experiments to understand pressure and volume issues of the circulatory system.

Keywords

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Coronary Angiography Compute Tomography Angiography Coronary Artery Calcification Coronary Compute Tomography Angiography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Forssmann, W. Die Sondierung des rechten Herzens. Klin Wochenschr. 1929;8:2085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cournand, AF. Nobel lecture, December 11, 1956. In: Nobel Lectures, Physiology and Medicine 1942–1962. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1964:529.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zimmerman HA, Scott RW, Becker ND. Catheterization of the left side of the heart in man. Circulation. 1950;1:357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography: a new technique. Acta Radiol. 1953;39:368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sones FM Jr, Shirey EK. Cine coronary arteriography. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis. 1962;31:735–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bayshore TM, et al. ACC/SCA&I Expert Consensus Document on Cath Lab Standards. JACC. 2001;37:2170–214.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    King III et al. Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC. 2008;51:172–209.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Noto TJ, et al. Cardiac Catheterization 1990: a report of the registry of the Society of Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1991;24:75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Birck R, Krzossok S, Markowetz F, et al. Acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast nephropathy: meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2003;362:598–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Marana I, et al. N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2773–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brigouri C, Airoldi F, D’Andrea D, et al. Renal Insuffiency Following Contrast Media Administration Trial (REMEDIAL): A randomized comparison of 3 preventive strategies. Circulation. 2007;115:1211–217Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bagshaw SM, Ghali WA. Theophylline for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Int Med 2005;165:1087–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scanlon PJ, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. Circulation. 1999;99:2345–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH, CATSCAN Study Investigators. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA. 2006;296:403.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur heart J. 2005;26:1482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raff GJ, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, et al. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area: a histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 1995;92:2157–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Budhoff M, Shaw L, et al. Long term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observation from a registry of 25,253 patients. JACC. 49:18;2007:1860–70.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McClelland RL, Chung H, Detrano R, et al. Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender, and age: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation. 2006;113:30–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taylor AJ, Cequeira M, Hodgson JM, et al. Appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56:1864–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Einstein AJ et al. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;198:317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Division of CardiologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations