Advertisement

Face Recognition in Forensic Science

  • Nicole A. Spaun

Abstract

In this chapter, we will first explain the current means of comparing faces used by forensic science laboratories. It is a nonautomated process performed by forensic examiners and has been referred to as facial “photographic comparison” or forensic facial identification. Next, we will outline the innovative ways in which facial recognition systems are being used by the forensic community. Lastly, we will discuss the growing future of facial biometrics in the legal system and the increasing (not decreasing) need for human examiners to perform facial identification in combination with the automated facial recognition systems.

Keywords

Facial Recognition Forensic Science Facial Recognition System Automate Teller Machine Facial Identification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailey, B.A.M.: When to call a forensic artist. Evidence Technology Magazine Online. Technical note (2009). http://www.evidencemagazine.com/index.php/?option=comcontent&task=view&id=164
  2. 2.
    Bowyer, K.W., Chang, K., Flynn, P.: A survey of approaches and challenges in 3D and multi-modal 3D+2D face recognition. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 101(1), 1–15 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Browder, C.: DMV technology cracks down on fraud. WRAL.com. News article (2008). http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/4158631/
  4. 4.
    Evison, M., Vorder Bruegge, R.W.: The Magna Database: A database of three-dimensional facial images for research in human identification and recognition. Forensic Sci. Commun. 10(2) (2008) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evison, M.P., Vorder Bruegge, R.W.: Computer-Aided Forensic Facial Comparison. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farkas, L.G., Munro, I.R. (eds.): Anthropometric Facial Proportions in Medicine. Charles C Thomas, Springfield (1987) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang, T., Xiong, Z., Zhang, Z.: Face recognition applications. In: Li, S.Z., Jain, A.K. (eds.) Handbook of Face Recognition. Springer, New York (2005) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huber, R.A.: Expert witnesses. Crim. Law Q. 2, 276–296 (1959) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iannarelli, A.V.: The Iannarelli System of Ear Identification. Foundation Press, Brooklyn (1964) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iscan, M.Y., Helmer, R.P. (eds.): Forensic Analysis of the Skull. Wiley-Liss, New York (1993) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jain, A.K., Park, U.: Facial marks: Soft biometric for face recognition. In: Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 37–40 (2009) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jingu, H., Savvides, M.: In between 3D active appearance models and 3D morphable models. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, pp. 20–26 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kleinberg, K., Pharm, B., Vanezis, P., Burton, A.M.: Failure of anthropometry as a facial identification technique using high-quality photographs. J. Forensic Sci. 4, 779–783 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Toole, A.J., Abdi, H., Jiang, F., Phillips, P.J.: Fusing face-verification algorithms and humans. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B 37(5) (2007) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scientific Working Group on Imaging Technologies, Best practices for forensic image analysis. Forensic Sci. Commun. (2005). http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/oct2005/standards/200510standards01.htm
  16. 16.
    Spaun, N.A.: Facial comparison by subject matter experts: Their role in biometrics and their training. In: Tistarelli, M., Nixon, M.S. (eds.) Advances in Biometrics. LNCS, vol. 5558, pp. 161–168. Springer, Berlin (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tuthill, H., George, G.: Individualization: Principles and Procedures in Criminalistics, 2nd edn. Lightning Powder, Jacksonville (2002) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    van der Lugt, C.: Earprint Identification. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vanezis, P., Brierley, C.: Facial image comparison of crime suspects using video superimposition. Sci. Justice 36, 27–34 (1996) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vorder Bruegge, R.W., Musheno, T.: Some cautions regarding the application of biometric analysis and computer-aided facial recognition in law enforcement. In: Proceedings of the American Defense Preparedness Association’s 12th Annual Joint Government-Industry Security Technology Symposium and Exhibition, p. 8 (1996) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang, Y., McCullough, C., Sullins, J.R., Ross, C.R.: Human and computer evaluations of face sketches with implications for forensic investigations. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems (BTAS), pp. 475–485 (2008) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forensic Audio, Video and Image Analysis UnitFederal Bureau of InvestigationQuanticoUSA
  2. 2.United States Army Europe HeadquartersHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.USAREURAPOUSA

Personalised recommendations