Advertisement

The Hugging Team: The Role of Technology in Business Networking Practices

  • Anne Thorsø Sørensen
  • Irina Shklovski
Conference paper

Abstract

Technological devices for social networking are produced in droves and networking through media seems to be the way of getting ahead in business. We examine what role technology plays in the creation, development and maintenance of business relationships among entrepreneurs in Copenhagen. We find that mediated communication is useful in all stages of relational maintenance but only in a supportive role in relational development where co-presence and shared personal experiences take center-stage, generating trust necessary for business relationships to work. These trust-developing experiences take effort and hard work and although they can be successfully supported and even facilitated through the use of communication technologies, they need not be replaced or made simpler. The difficulties of creating these experiences make working business relationships viable in the uncertain and risky world of entrepreneurship.

Keywords

Social Capital Communication Technology Social Network Site Business Partner Business Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barkhuus, L., & Tashiro, J. (2010). Student socialization in the age of facebook. Proceedings of CHI 2010 Google Scholar
  2. Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2006). Personal relationships: On and off the Internet. In D. Perlman & A. L. Vangelisti (Eds.), Handbook of Personal Relations. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., & Wright, Z. (2002). Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. Proceedings of CHI 2002Google Scholar
  5. boyd, d., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. Proceedings of CHI 2010.Google Scholar
  7. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  8. Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191–233.Google Scholar
  9. DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. (2008). Motivations for social networking at work. Proceedings of CSCW 2008.Google Scholar
  10. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jack, S., Moult, S., Anderson, A. R., & Dodd, S. (2010). An entrepreneurial network evolving: Patterns of change. International Small Business Journal, 28(4), 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jarvenpaa, S., & Leidner, D. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In proceedings of CSCW 2006.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, J. (2010). 500 Friends and No One to Call: Insights on the Reality of Social Networking. Copenhagen, DK: ReD. Retrieved 1/23/2011, http://www.redassociates.com/redpapers/socialmedia/
  18. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maldonado, H., Klemmer, S. R., & Pea, R. D. (2009). When is collaborating with friends a good idea? insights from design education. Proceedings of CSCL 2009 - Volume 1.Google Scholar
  20. Manjoo, F. (2010, August 26, 2010). Social Networking Your Way to a New Job. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  21. Mayer, R., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.Google Scholar
  22. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nardi, B. (2005). Beyond Bandwidth: Dimensions of Connection in Interpersonal Communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14(2), 91–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nardi, B., & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face to face communication in distributed work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 83–112). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal relationships and personal networks. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Perlman, D., & Fehr, B. (1986). Theories of friendship: The analysis of interpersonal attraction. In V. Derlega & B. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction (pp. 9–40). NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Rocco, E. (1998). Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial faceto- face contact. Proceedings of CHI 1998, 496–502.Google Scholar
  28. Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A Social Capital Theory of Career Success. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shklovski, I., Kraut, R., & Cummings, J. (2008). Keeping in touch by technology: Maintaining relationships after a residential move. In proceedings of CHI 2008.Google Scholar
  30. Sigman, S. J. (1991). Handling discontinuous aspects of continuing social relationships: Toward research on the persistence of social forms. Communication Theory, 1, 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Skeels, M. M., & Grudin, J. (2009). When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin. Proceedings of GROUP 2009.Google Scholar
  32. Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment Model, Equity, and Social Support Determinants of Relationship Commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(4), 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. Proceedings of C&T 2009.Google Scholar
  34. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1986). The social psychology of groups. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  35. Wilson, J. M., Straus, S. G., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wu, A., DiMicco, J. M., & Millen, D. R. (2010). Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site. Proceedings of CHI 2010.Google Scholar
  37. Zheng, J., Veinott, E., Bos, N., Olson, J. S., & Olson, G. M. (2002). Trust without touch: jumpstarting long-distance trust with initial social activities. Proceedings of CHI 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IT University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations