Advertisement

What Are You Working On? Status Message Q&A in an Enterprise SNS

  • Jennifer Thom
  • Sandra Yuen Helsley
  • Tara L. Matthews
  • Elizabeth M. Daly
  • David R. Millen
Conference paper

Abstract

Social networking services (SNS) have been deployed within enterprises to encourage informal social interactions and information sharing. As such, users have turned to the status message functionality in a SNS for social information seeking by employing it as a medium for question asking. In this paper, we present the results of a qualitative study observing emergent question and answer (Q&A) behaviors in an enterprise SNS and then describe user motivations in employing this medium for social information seeking. We report data describing the types and topics of questions asked within the workplace and the prevalence of questions and responses within this system. Results suggest that users choose status message Q&A for non-urgent information seeking needs and perceive question asking as a way to elicit social support from their professional networks.

Keywords

Social Network Social Information Question Type Social Networking Service Professional Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, M. S., & Malone, T. W. (1990): ’Answer Garden: A tool for growing organizational memory’, Proceedings of COCS 1990, pp. 31–39.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman, M. S., & McDonald, D. (1996): ’Answer Garden 2: Merging organizational memory and collective help’, Proceedings of CSCW 1996.Google Scholar
  3. Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., & Ackerman, M. S. (2008): ’Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something’, Proc.WWW2008, pp. 665–674.Google Scholar
  4. Balakrishnan, A. D., Matthews, T., & Moran, T. P. (2010): ’Fitting an activity-centric system into an ecology of workplace tools’, Proc.CHI2010, pp. 787–790.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, M., Tan, D., Smith, G., Czerwinski, M., & Horvitz, E. (2009): ’Collabio: A game for annotating people within social networks’, Proc.UIST2009, pp. 97–100.Google Scholar
  6. Camino, B. M., Milewski, A. E., Millen, D. R., & Smith, T. M. (1998): ’Replying to email with structured responses’, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 48(6), 763–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chudoba, K.M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., Watson-Manheim, B. (2005): ’How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization,’ Information Systems Journal, 15, pp. 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cross, R., Rice, R. E., & Parker, A. (2001): ’Information seeking in social context: Structural influences and receipt of information benefits,’ IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 31(4), 438–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DiMicco, J., Geyer, W., Millen, D. R., Dugan, C., & Brownholtz, B. (2009): ’People Sensemaking and Relationship Building on an Enterprise Social Network Site’, Proc.HICSS2009, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  10. DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. (2008): ’Motivations for social networking at work’, Proc.CSCW2008, pp. 711–720.Google Scholar
  11. Donath, J. (2008): ’Signals in social supernets’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunbar, P. R. (1998): Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Ehrlich, K., & Shami, N. S. (2010): ’Microblogging Inside and Outside the Workplace’, Proc.ICWSM2010. Google Scholar
  14. Farrell, S., Lau, T., Nusser, S., Wilcox, E., & Muller, M. (2007): ’Socially augmenting employee profiles with people-tagging’, Proc.UIST2007.Google Scholar
  15. Harper, F. M., Moy, D., & Konstan, J. A. (2009): ’Facts or friends?: distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites’, Proc.CHI2009, pp. 759–768.Google Scholar
  16. Kraut, R. E. (2003): ’Applying social psychological theory to the problems of group work’, in J. Carroll (eds.): HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks, Morgan Kaufman, New York, 2003, pp. 325–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leshed, G., Haber, E. M., Matthews, T., & Lau, T. (2008): ’CoScripter: automating & sharing how-to knowledge in the enterprise,’ Proc.CHI2008. Google Scholar
  18. Matthews. T., Matthews, T., Whittaker, S., Moran, T., Yuen, S. ’The New Organizational Ecology: Symbiotic Relationships Between Collaborations’, IBM Technical Paper. Google Scholar
  19. McGrath, J. E. (1984): Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  20. Millen, D., Yang, M., Whittaker, S., & Feinberg, J. (2007): ’Social bookmarking and exploratory search’, Proc.ECSCW 2007.Google Scholar
  21. Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., & Panovich, K. (2010): ’What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior’, Proc.CHI2010.Google Scholar
  22. Morris, M. R., & Horvitz, E. (2007): ’SearchTogether: an interface for collaborative web search’, Proc.UIST2007. Google Scholar
  23. Morrison, E. W. (2002): ’Information Seeking Within Organizations’, Human Communication Research, 28(2), pp. 229–242.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Mortensen, M. and Hinds, P. (2002). ’Fuzzy teams: Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams’, in P. Hinds and S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002, pp. 283–308.Google Scholar
  25. Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C. H. (2010): ’Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams’, Proc.CHI2010.Google Scholar
  26. Nam, K. K., Ackerman, M. S., & Adamic, L. A. (2009): ’Questions in, knowledge in?: a study of naver’s question answering community,’ Proc.WWW2009.Google Scholar
  27. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., and Schwarz, H. (2002): ’Networkers and their Activity in Intensional Networks’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 1–2, pp. 205–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Leary, M., Mortensen, M., and Woolley, A. (2011): ’Multiple Team Membership: A Theoretical Model of Its Effects on Productivity and Learning for Individuals, Teams, and Organizations’, Academy of Management Review. To appear.Google Scholar
  29. Ribak, A., Jacovi, M., & Soroka, V. (2002): ’"Ask before you search": peer support and community building with reachout’, Proc.CSCW2002. Google Scholar
  30. Shami, N. S., Ehrlich, K., Gay, G., & Hancock, J. T. (2009): ’Making sense of strangers’ expertise from signals in digital artifacts,’ Proc.CHI2009.Google Scholar
  31. Thom-Santelli, J., & Millen, D. R. (2009): ’Learning by seeing: photo viewing in the workplace’, Proc.CHI2009.Google Scholar
  32. Thom-Santelli, J., Muller, M. J., & Millen, D. R. (2008): ’Social tagging roles: publishers, evangelists, leaders,’ Proc.CHI2008.Google Scholar
  33. Welser, H. T., Gleave, E., Fisher, D., & Smith, M. (2007): ’Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups’, The Journal of Social Structure, 8(2).Google Scholar
  34. Wu, A., DiMicco, J. M., & Millen, D. R. (2010): ’Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site,’ Proc.CHI2010. Google Scholar
  35. Zhang, J., Qu, Y., Cody, J. and Wu, Y. (2011): ’A case study of microblogging in the enterprise: use, value and related issues’, Proc.CHI2010.Google Scholar
  36. Zhao, D., Matthews, T., Moran, T., Rosson, M.B. (2011): ’Microblogging’s Potential Impact on Team Collaboration Awareness’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Thom
    • 1
  • Sandra Yuen Helsley
    • 2
  • Tara L. Matthews
    • 2
  • Elizabeth M. Daly
    • 1
  • David R. Millen
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM Research - CambridgeCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.IBM Research - AlmadenSan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations