Abstract
Social networking services (SNS) have been deployed within enterprises to encourage informal social interactions and information sharing. As such, users have turned to the status message functionality in a SNS for social information seeking by employing it as a medium for question asking. In this paper, we present the results of a qualitative study observing emergent question and answer (Q&A) behaviors in an enterprise SNS and then describe user motivations in employing this medium for social information seeking. We report data describing the types and topics of questions asked within the workplace and the prevalence of questions and responses within this system. Results suggest that users choose status message Q&A for non-urgent information seeking needs and perceive question asking as a way to elicit social support from their professional networks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackerman, M. S., & Malone, T. W. (1990): ’Answer Garden: A tool for growing organizational memory’, Proceedings of COCS 1990, pp. 31–39.
Ackerman, M. S., & McDonald, D. (1996): ’Answer Garden 2: Merging organizational memory and collective help’, Proceedings of CSCW 1996.
Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., & Ackerman, M. S. (2008): ’Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something’, Proc.WWW2008, pp. 665–674.
Balakrishnan, A. D., Matthews, T., & Moran, T. P. (2010): ’Fitting an activity-centric system into an ecology of workplace tools’, Proc.CHI2010, pp. 787–790.
Bernstein, M., Tan, D., Smith, G., Czerwinski, M., & Horvitz, E. (2009): ’Collabio: A game for annotating people within social networks’, Proc.UIST2009, pp. 97–100.
Camino, B. M., Milewski, A. E., Millen, D. R., & Smith, T. M. (1998): ’Replying to email with structured responses’, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 48(6), 763–776.
Chudoba, K.M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., Watson-Manheim, B. (2005): ’How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization,’ Information Systems Journal, 15, pp. 279–306.
Cross, R., Rice, R. E., & Parker, A. (2001): ’Information seeking in social context: Structural influences and receipt of information benefits,’ IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 31(4), 438–448.
DiMicco, J., Geyer, W., Millen, D. R., Dugan, C., & Brownholtz, B. (2009): ’People Sensemaking and Relationship Building on an Enterprise Social Network Site’, Proc.HICSS2009, pp. 1–10.
DiMicco, J., Millen, D. R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B., & Muller, M. (2008): ’Motivations for social networking at work’, Proc.CSCW2008, pp. 711–720.
Donath, J. (2008): ’Signals in social supernets’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 231–251.
Dunbar, P. R. (1998): Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ehrlich, K., & Shami, N. S. (2010): ’Microblogging Inside and Outside the Workplace’, Proc.ICWSM2010.
Farrell, S., Lau, T., Nusser, S., Wilcox, E., & Muller, M. (2007): ’Socially augmenting employee profiles with people-tagging’, Proc.UIST2007.
Harper, F. M., Moy, D., & Konstan, J. A. (2009): ’Facts or friends?: distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites’, Proc.CHI2009, pp. 759–768.
Kraut, R. E. (2003): ’Applying social psychological theory to the problems of group work’, in J. Carroll (eds.): HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks, Morgan Kaufman, New York, 2003, pp. 325–356.
Leshed, G., Haber, E. M., Matthews, T., & Lau, T. (2008): ’CoScripter: automating & sharing how-to knowledge in the enterprise,’ Proc.CHI2008.
Matthews. T., Matthews, T., Whittaker, S., Moran, T., Yuen, S. ’The New Organizational Ecology: Symbiotic Relationships Between Collaborations’, IBM Technical Paper.
McGrath, J. E. (1984): Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Millen, D., Yang, M., Whittaker, S., & Feinberg, J. (2007): ’Social bookmarking and exploratory search’, Proc.ECSCW 2007.
Morris, M. R., Teevan, J., & Panovich, K. (2010): ’What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior’, Proc.CHI2010.
Morris, M. R., & Horvitz, E. (2007): ’SearchTogether: an interface for collaborative web search’, Proc.UIST2007.
Morrison, E. W. (2002): ’Information Seeking Within Organizations’, Human Communication Research, 28(2), pp. 229–242.
Mortensen, M. and Hinds, P. (2002). ’Fuzzy teams: Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams’, in P. Hinds and S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002, pp. 283–308.
Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C. H. (2010): ’Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams’, Proc.CHI2010.
Nam, K. K., Ackerman, M. S., & Adamic, L. A. (2009): ’Questions in, knowledge in?: a study of naver’s question answering community,’ Proc.WWW2009.
Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., and Schwarz, H. (2002): ’Networkers and their Activity in Intensional Networks’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 1–2, pp. 205–242.
O’Leary, M., Mortensen, M., and Woolley, A. (2011): ’Multiple Team Membership: A Theoretical Model of Its Effects on Productivity and Learning for Individuals, Teams, and Organizations’, Academy of Management Review. To appear.
Ribak, A., Jacovi, M., & Soroka, V. (2002): ’"Ask before you search": peer support and community building with reachout’, Proc.CSCW2002.
Shami, N. S., Ehrlich, K., Gay, G., & Hancock, J. T. (2009): ’Making sense of strangers’ expertise from signals in digital artifacts,’ Proc.CHI2009.
Thom-Santelli, J., & Millen, D. R. (2009): ’Learning by seeing: photo viewing in the workplace’, Proc.CHI2009.
Thom-Santelli, J., Muller, M. J., & Millen, D. R. (2008): ’Social tagging roles: publishers, evangelists, leaders,’ Proc.CHI2008.
Welser, H. T., Gleave, E., Fisher, D., & Smith, M. (2007): ’Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups’, The Journal of Social Structure, 8(2).
Wu, A., DiMicco, J. M., & Millen, D. R. (2010): ’Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site,’ Proc.CHI2010.
Zhang, J., Qu, Y., Cody, J. and Wu, Y. (2011): ’A case study of microblogging in the enterprise: use, value and related issues’, Proc.CHI2010.
Zhao, D., Matthews, T., Moran, T., Rosson, M.B. (2011): ’Microblogging’s Potential Impact on Team Collaboration Awareness’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems 2011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thom, J., Helsley, S.Y., Matthews, T.L., Daly, E.M., Millen, D.R. (2011). What Are You Working On? Status Message Q&A in an Enterprise SNS. In: Bødker, S., Bouvin, N., Wulf, V., Ciolfi, L., Lutters, W. (eds) ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24-28 September 2011, Aarhus Denmark. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-912-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-913-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)