Abstract
This paper discusses the challenge of supporting digitally mediated citizengovernment collaboration in public service provision. With a vantage point in activity theory and the empirical data from three exploratory design cases, we derive a theoretical framework for understanding the way in which citizens share information with government. Through the proposed framework and the notion of Participatory Citizenship, we propose a set of central design challenges to supporting collaboration within this setting. We argue that civil servants and citizens have inherently different foci in the service provision process. Hence, we conclude that the focus of design should not be to support a shared motive for the overall service delivery, but to support a better common understanding of the case process in itself, i.e. the involved actors, their motives, and their mediating artifacts. Moreover, we argue that the aim of technological support for complex collaboration should not be leaner, more rational case processes, but improved citizen involvement in the configuration of service provision and the alignment of actor motives. Lastly, we exemplify how these design challenges can be met by discussing how a concrete exploratory prototype in the form of a web-based timeline addresses collaboration within a complex service provision setting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bannon, L. and Schmidt, K. (1991): ‘CSCW, four characters in search of a context’, in J.M. Bowers and S.D. Benford (eds.): Studies in computer supported cooperative work. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 3–16.
Bardram, J. (1998a): Collaboration, Coordination, and Computer Support-An Activity Theoretical Approach to the Design of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Dissertation Aarhus University.
Bardram, J. (1998b): ‘Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities’. Proceedings of the ACM CSCW ’98. ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 89–98.
Barney, D. (2000): Prometheus Wired: The Hope for Democracy in the Age of Network Technology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Bertelsen, O.W. and Bødker, S. (2001): ‘Cooperation in massively distributed information spaces.’ ECSCW 2001: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 1–18.
Bohøj, M., Borchorst, N.G., Bouvin, N., Bødker, S. and Zander, P.-O. (2010): ‘Timeline collaboration.’ CHI 2010, pp. 523–532, ACM Press.
Bohøj, M., Borchorst, N.G., Bødker, S., Korn, M. and Zander, P.-O. (2011): ‘Public deliberation in municipal planning: supporting action and reflection with mobile technology,’ ACM Communities and Technologies, in press.
Borchorst, N.G., Bødker, S. and Zander, P.-O. (2009): ‚Participatory citizenship’, ECSCW 2009: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 1–20.
Bowers, J. Button, G. and Sharrock, W. (1995): ‘Workflow from within and without: technology and cooperative work on the print industry shopfloor.’ Proceedings of the fourth conference on European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW’95). Kluwer Dordrecht, pp. 51–66.
Bryant, S. L., Forte, A. and Bruckman, A. (2005): ‘Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia.’ Proceedings of GROUP, ACM Press, NY, pp. 1–10.
Bowker, G.C. and Star, S.L. (1999): Sorting Things Out. Classification and its Consequences, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Bødker, S. and Grønbæk, K. (1995): ‘Users and Designers in Mutual Activity- an analysis of cooperative activities in systems design,’ in Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (Eds.). Cognition and Communication at Work, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 130–158.
Bødker, S. and Christiansen, E. (1997): ‘Scenarios as springboards in design.,’ in Bowker, G., Gasser, L., Star, S.L. and Turner, W. (eds.). Social science research, technical systems and cooperative work. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp. 217–234.
Bødker, S. and Christiansen, E. (2004): ‘Designing for ephemerality and prototypicality.’ Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp. 255–260.
Bødker, S. and Klokmose, C.N. (2011): ‘The Human-Artifact Model,’ accepted for publication in HCI Journal.
Clement, A. and Wagner, I. (1995): ‘Fragmented exchange: Disarticulation and the need for regionalized communication spaces.’ Proceedings of ECSCW ‘95, Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp. 33–49.
Cohen, A.L., Cash, D. and Muller, M.J. (2000): ‘Designing to support adversarial collaboration.’ Proceedings of CSCW 2000, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 31–39.
Engeström, Y. (1987): Learning by Expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki.
Engeström, Y. (1990): Learning Working and Imagining. Twelve Studies in Activity Theory. Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki.
Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Christopher, L. and Gregory, J. (1997). ‘Coordination, Cooperation, and Communication in the courts. ‘In Cole, M., Engeström, Y., and Vasquez, O. (Eds.) Mind, Culture, and Activity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp. 369–385.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. and Saarelma, O. (1988): ‘Computerized medical records, production pressure and compartmentalization in the work activity of health center physicians.’ Proceedings of CSCW ’88. ACM, New York, NY, pp. 65–84.
Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (eds.) (1991): Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Grudin, J. (1994): ‘Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers..’ Communications of the ACM, 37, 1 pp. 92–105.
Jaeger, P. T. and Thompson, M. (2003): ‘E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions.’ Government Information Quarterly 20, pp. 389–394.
Kling, R. (1991): ‘Cooperation, coordination and control in computer-supported work.’ Communications of the ACM. 34 (12), pp. 83–88.
Kuutti, K. (1991): ‘The concept of activity as a basic unit of analysis for CSCW research.’ Proceedings of ECSCW’91. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 249–264.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991): Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D. and Davis, M. (2006). HT06, Tagging Paper, Taxonomy, Flickr, Academic Article, ToRead. Proc. Hypertext ’06, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 31–40.
Osimo, D. (2008): Web 2.0 in government: why and how? Technical Report. JRC, EUR 23358, EC JRC.
Raeithel, A. (1996): ‘From coordinatedness to Coordination via Cooperation and Coconstruction.’ Workshop on Work and Learning in Transition, San Diego, January.
Schmidt, K and Bannon, L. (1992): ‘Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work.’ JCSCW, Vol. 1, Nos. 1–2, 7–40.
Schön, D. (1983): The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Temple Smith, London.
Robinson, M. (1991): ‘Double-level languages and co-operative working.’ AI and Society, 5(1), pp. 34–60 Springer London.
Star, S.L. (1989): ‘The structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem solving’. Distributed Artificial Intelligence, volume II, chapter 3, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp. 37–54.
Star, S.L. (1996): ‘Working together: symbolic interactionism, activity theory, and information systems.’ Engeström, Y. and Middleton D. (Eds.). Cognition and Communication at Work, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp. 296–318.
Vigoda, E. (2002): ‘From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration.’ Public Administration Review, 62(5), pp. 527–540.
Westheimer, J. and Kahne, J. (2004): ‘Educating the "Good" Citizen: Political Choices and Pedagogical Goals.’ Political Science and Politics, pp. 241–247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Borchorst, N.G., Bødker, S. (2011). “You probably shouldn’t give them too much information” – Supporting Citizen-Government Collaboration. In: Bødker, S., Bouvin, N., Wulf, V., Ciolfi, L., Lutters, W. (eds) ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24-28 September 2011, Aarhus Denmark. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-912-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-913-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)