Dynamic Self-moderation in a Corporate Wiki to Improve Participation and Contribution Quality

  • Silviya Dencheva
  • Christian R. Prause
  • Wolfgang Prinz
Conference paper


Contribution to a corporate wiki for the purpose of knowledge transfer can be very low because of continuously pressing tasks, a chronic lack of spare time, and motivational reasons. This is a problem because the wiki fails to achieve its purpose of collecting valuable knowledge, and becomes less attractive through this over time. We present a reputation-based system that socially rewards employees for their contributions, and thereby increases their motivation to contribute to the wiki. In a four months trial of productive use with two work groups, we could show that our concept increases the quantity and quality of articles in the repository, leads to higher activity in general, and draws employees to the wiki who had not contributed before.


Evaluation Phase Reputation System Ranking List Computer Support Cooperative Work Reputation Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adler, B. T., K. Chatterjee, L. de Alfaro, M. Faella, I. Pye, and V. Raman (2008): ‘Assigning Trust to Wikipedia Content’. In: International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym).Google Scholar
  2. Antin, J. and C. Cheshire (2010): ‘Readers Are Not Free-riders: Reading as a Form of Participation on Wikipedia’. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). New York, NY, USA, pp. 127–130, ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, D. J. (2008): MediaWiki. USA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  4. Danowski, P. and J. Voss (2004): ‘Bibliothek, Information und Dokumentation in der Wikipedia’. Information, Wissenschaft und Praxis, vol. 55, no. 8.Google Scholar
  5. Dencheva, S. (2010): ‘Entwicklung und Evaluation einer soziotechnischen Komponente zur dynamischen Selbstmoderation in einem Firmeninformationssystem’. Diplomarbeit, Fraunhofer FIT, Universität Bonn.Google Scholar
  6. Elster, J. (1989): The cement of society: A study of social order. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Farzan, R., J. M. DiMicco, D. R. Millen, C. Dugan, W. Geyer, and E. A. Brownholtz (2008): ‘Results from Deploying a Participation Incentive Mechanism within the Enterprise’. In: 26th AnnualSIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA, pp. 563–572, ACM.Google Scholar
  8. Hoisl, B., W. Aigner, and S. Miksch (2007): ‘Social Rewarding in Wiki Systems — Motivating the Community’. In: Online Communities and Social Computing. Berlin Heidelberg New York, p. 362–371, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holtzblatt, L. J., L. E. Damianos, and D. Weiss (2010): ‘Factors Impeding Wiki Use in the Enterprise: a Case Study’. In: 28th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA, pp. 4661–4676, ACM.Google Scholar
  10. Josang, A., R. Ismail, and C. Boyd (2005): ‘A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision’. Decision Support Systems, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 618–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kittur, A. and R. E. Kraut (2010): ‘BeyondWikipedia: Coordination and Conflict in Online Production Groups’. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). New York, NY, USA, pp. 215–224, ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kraut, R., M. L. Maher, J. Olson, T. W. Malone, P. Pirolli, and J. C. Thomas (2010): ‘Scientific Foundations: A Case for Technology-Mediated Social-Participation Theory’. Computer, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McAdam, R. and S. McCreedy (2000): ‘A critique of knowledge management: using a social constructionist model’. New Technology, Work and Employment, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Muller, M. J., J. Freyne, C. Dugan, D. R. Millen, and J. Thom-Santelli (2009): ‘Return On Contribution (ROC): A Metric for Enterprise Social Software’. In: I. Wagner, H. Tellioğlu, E. Balka, C. Simone, and L. Ciolfi (eds.): Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW). pp. 143–150, Springer London.Google Scholar
  15. Prause, C. R. (2009): ‘Maintaining Fine-Grained Code Metadata Regardless of Moving, Copying and Merging’. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation. Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 109–118, IEEE Computer Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Prause, C. R. and S. Apelt (2008): ‘An approach for continuous inspection of source code’. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on software quality. Leipzig, Germany, pp. 17–22, ACM New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Reichling, T. and M. Veith (2005): ‘Expertise Sharing in a Heterogeneous Organizational Environment’. In: H. Gellersen, K. Schmidt, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, and W. Mackay (eds.): Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW). pp. 325–345, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Resnick, P., K. Kuwabara, R. Zeckhauser, and E. Friedman (2000): ‘Reputation systems’. Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rohs, M. (2007): ‘Qualitative Forschung auf dem Wiki Way’. Technologie ver¨andert die Bildungsforschung, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silviya Dencheva
    • 1
  • Christian R. Prause
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Prinz
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer FITUniversität BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations