Theoretical Study of the Parametric Sensitivity

  • Benoît Robyns
  • Bruno Francois
  • Philippe Degobert
  • Jean Paul Hautier
Part of the Power Systems book series (POWSYS)


So as to avoid the measurement of the flux, the previous chapter has shown that it is possible to estimate or to impose the flux indirectly by using models. This great dependence on a model results in significant sensitivity problems of these controls to the uncertainties on this model. These uncertainties are due to the variations in the stator and rotor resistances according to the temperature and to the skin effect. They are also due to the variations in the inductances according to the magnetic saturation.


Integral Action Rotor Resistance Orientation Error Electromagnetic Torque Flux Component 


  1. Robyns, B., Labrique, F., & Buyse, H. (1996). Commande numérique simplifiée et robuste d’actionneurs asynchrones de faible puissance. Journal de Physique III, 6, 1039–1057. (August 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hautier, J.P., & Caron, J.P. (1999). Convertisseurs statiques: méthodologie causale de modélisation et de commande. Paris: Editions Technip, ISBN 2–7108-0745–9Google Scholar
  3. Robyns, B., Fu, Y., Buyse, H., & Labrique, F. (1994). Flux control performance of an induction motor indirect F.O.C using a simplified current control strategy: Proceedings of ICEM’94, Paris, Sept 1994 (Vol. 2, pp. 374–379)Google Scholar
  4. Robyns, B., Sente, P., Labrique, F., & Buyse, H. (1999). Influence of digital current control strategy on the sensitivity to electrical parameter uncertainties of induction motor indirect field oriented control. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 49(4), 690–699. (juillet 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Robyns, B., Meuret, R., & Sente, P. (2002). Commande vectorielle indirecte de la machine asynchrone. Influence de la stratégie de régulation digitale des courants sur les performances de la commande, Revue Internationale de Génie Electrique, Hermès, 5(1), 35–47.Google Scholar
  6. Robyns, B., Berthereau, F., Cossart, G., Chevalier, L., Labrique, F., & Buyse, H. (2000a). A methodology to determine gains of induction motor flux observers based on a theoretical parameter sensitivity analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 15(6), 983–995. (Nov 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Robyns, B. (2000c). Synthèse de commande robustes pour machine asynchrone basée sur une théorie caractérisant la sensibilité paramétrique. Research report from Université des Sciences et Technologies de LilleGoogle Scholar
  8. Delmotte, E., Semail, B., Robyns, B., & Hautier, J. P. (2001). Flux observer for induction machine control. Part I: Sensitivity analysis as a function of sampling rate and parameters variations. Part II: Robust synthesis and experimental implementation. The European Physical Journal, Applied Physics, 14, 13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caron, J.P., & Hautier, J.P. (1995). Modélisation et commande de la machine asynchrone. Paris: Editions Technip, ISBN 2–7108-0683–5Google Scholar
  10. Robyns, B., Buyse, H., & Labrique, F. (1998). Fuzzy logic based field orientation in an indirect FOC strategy of an induction actuator. Mathematics and Computer in Simulation, 46, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Robyns, B., Berthereau, F., Hautier, J. P., & Buyse, H. (2000b). A fuzzy logic based multimodel field orientation in an indirect F.O.C. of an induction motor. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 47(2), 380–388. (avril 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benoît Robyns
    • 1
  • Bruno Francois
    • 2
  • Philippe Degobert
    • 3
  • Jean Paul Hautier
    • 4
  1. 1.Hautes Etudes d’IgénieurLille cedexFrance
  2. 2.Ecole Centrale de LilleVilleneuve d’Ascq cedexFrance
  3. 3.Arts et Métiers ParisTechLille cedexFrance
  4. 4.Arts et Métiers ParisTechParis cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations