Skip to main content

Critical Care Scoring Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Physicians have long practiced the art of prognostication. This has always been highly subjective and is influenced by the individual’s clinical experiences, human factors such as optimism and fatigue, and the inability to fully weigh up the contributing factors of disease. In recent years, attempts have been made to minimize the effect of human error in decision-making processes by introducing severity of illness scoring systems.

It appears to me a most excellent thing for the physician to cultivate Prognosis; for by foreseeing and foretelling, in the presence of the sick, the present, the past, and the future, and explaining the omissions which patients have been guilty of, he will be the more readily believed to be acquainted with the circumstances of the sick; so that men will have confidence to entrust themselves to such a physician. And he will manage the cure best who has foreseen what is to happen from the present state of matters.

Hippocrates, The Book of Prognostics 400 BC

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cullen DJ, Civetta JM, Briggs BA, et al. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care. Crit Care Med. 1974;2:57–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Suter P, Armagandis A, Beaufils F, et al. Predicting outcome in ICU patients: consensus conference organized by the ESICM and the SRLF. Intensive Care Med. 1994;20:390–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knaus WA, Harrell FE, Lynn J, et al. The SUPPORT prognostic model. Objective estimates for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:191–203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McKee M, Hunter D. What can comparisons of hospital death rates tell us about the quality of care? In: Delamothe T, editor. Outcomes in clinical practice. London: British Medical Journal Press; 1994. p. 108–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc. 1979;74:829–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cleveland WS. LOWESS: a program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression. Am Stat. 1981;35:54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller RG. The jackknife – a review. Biometrica. 1974;61:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Efron B, Gong G. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Am Stat. 1983;37:36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Gall J-R, Loirat P, Alperovitch A, Glaser P, Granthil C, Mathieu D, Mercier P, Thomas R. A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 1984;12:975–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Le Gall J-R, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270:2957–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreno RP, Metnitz PG, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Campos RA, Lapichino G, Edbrooke D, Capuzzo M, Le Gall JR. SAPS 3 – from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1345–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med. 1981;9:591–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano A, Harrell FE. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991;100:1619–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1297–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM, Shaffer VL. Intensive care unit length of stay: benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2517–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Pastides H, Avrunin JS, Steingrub JS. A method for predicting survival and mortality of ICU patients using objectively derived weights. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:519–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin JS, Gehlbach SH, Rapoport J. Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA. 1993;270:2478–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Higgins TL, Teres D, Copes WS, Nathanson BH, Stark M, Kramer AA. Assessing contemporary intensive care unit outcome: an updated Mortality Probability Admission Model (MPM0-III). Crit Care Med. 2007;35:827–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Teasdale G, Jennet B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cullen DJ, Civetta JM, Briggs BA, Ferrara LC. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care. Crit Care Med. 1974;2:57–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Keene AR, Cullen DJ. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: update 1983. Crit Care Med. 1983;11:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miranda DR, de Rijk A, Schaufeli W. Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: the TISS-28 items – results from a multicentre study. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:64–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78:355–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1217–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Prytherch DR, Sutton GL, Boyle JR. Portsmouth POSSUM models for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88:958–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Horzic M, Kopljar M, Cupurdija K. Comparison of P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scores in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection. Arch Surg. 2007;142:1043–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Harrison DA, Rowan KM. Outcome prediction in critical care: the ICNARC model. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:506–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Livingston BM, MacKirdy FN, Howie JC, Jones R, Norrie JD. Assessment of the performance of five intensive care scoring models within a large Scottish database. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1820–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hamel MB, Goldman L, Teno J, et al. Identification of comatose patients at high risk for death or severe disability. SUPPORT investigators. Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. JAMA. 1995;273:1842–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut JF, Lopez-Rodriguez A, Steingrub JS, Garber GE, Helterbrand JD, Ely EW, Fisher Jr CJ. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:699–709.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vincent JL, Opal SM, Marshall JC. Ten reasons why we should NOT use severity scores as entry criteria for clinical trials or in our treatment decisions. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:283–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cooper LM, Linde-Zwirble WT. Medicare intensive care unit use: analysis of incidence, cost, and payment. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2247–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Glance LG, Osler T, Shinozaki T. Effect of varying the case mix on the standardized mortality ratio and W statistic: a simulation study. Chest. 2000;117:1112–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kahn JM, Kramer AA, Rubenfeld GD. Transferring critically ill patients out of hospital improves the standardized mortality ratio: a simulation study. Chest. 2007;131:68–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vincent JL, Moreno R. Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill. Crit Care. 2010;14:207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dermot Burke M.B.Ch.B., FRCS, Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fisher, A., Burke, D. (2012). Critical Care Scoring Systems. In: Brown, S., Hartley, J., Hill, J., Scott, N., Williams, J. (eds) Contemporary Coloproctology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-889-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-889-8_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-888-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-889-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics