Skip to main content

Surgical Options in Ulcerative Colitis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Contemporary Coloproctology

Abstract

The lifetime incidence of colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is traditionally quoted as being in the region of 30%. However, recent population-based cohort evidence from Europe suggests that the colectomy rate after 10 years of disease may be 10% lower [1, 2]. The surgical options are governed by the indication for the surgery as well as patient-related factors including general condition, level of immunosuppression, age, and comorbidities, as well as psychological factors and patient preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hoie O, Wolters FL, Riis L, Bernklev T, Aamodt G, Clofent J, et al. Low colectomy rates in ulcerative colitis in an unselected European cohort followed for 10 years. Gastroenterol. 2007;132(2):507–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Solberg IC, Lygren I, Jahnsen J, Aadland E, Hoie O, Cvancarova M, et al. Clinical course during the first 10 years of ulcerative colitis: results from a population-based inception cohort (IBSEN Study). Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(4):431–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brady RR, Collie MH, Ho GT, Bartolo DC, Wilson RG, Dunlop MG. Outcomes of the rectal remnant following colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(2):144–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nicholls RJ, Tekkis PP. Ulcerative colitis. In: Phillips RKS, editor. Colorectal surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2005. p. 129–62.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kock NG. Intra-abdominal “reservoir” in patients with permanent ileostomy. Preliminary observations on a procedure resulting in fecal “continence” in five ileostomy patients. Arch Surg. 1969;99(2):223–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen Z, McLeod RS. Proctocolectomy with Kock pouch. In: Michelassi F, Milsom JW, editors. Operative strategies in inflammatory bowel disease. New York: Springer; 1999. p. 215.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindsey I, George BD, Kettlewell MG, Mortensen NJ. Impotence after mesorectal and close rectal dissection for inflammatory bowel disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(6):831–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lyttle JA, Parks AG. Intersphincteric excision of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1977;64(6):413–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J. 1978;2(6130):85–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bach SP, Mortensen NJ. Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(24):3288–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ording OK, Juul S, Berndtsson I, Oresland T, Laurberg S. Ulcerative colitis: female fecundity before diagnosis, during disease, and after surgery compared with a population sample. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(1):15–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farouk R, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Dozois RR, Browning S, Larson D. Functional outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2000;231(6):919–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell PJ, Rabau MY, Haboubi NY. Indeterminate colitis. Tech Coloproctol. 2007;11(2):91–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu CS, Pemberton JH, Larson D. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate colitis: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(11):1487–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Delaney CP, Remzi FH, Gramlich T, Dadvand B, Fazio VW. Equivalent function, quality of life and pouch survival rates after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for indeterminate and ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2002;236(1):43–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dayton MT, Larsen KR, Christiansen DD. Similar functional results and complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate versus ulcerative colitis. Arch Surg. 2002;137(6):690–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Uraiqat AA, Byrne CM, Phillips RK. Gaining length in ileal-anal pouch reconstruction: a review. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(7):657–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Michelassi F, Takanishi D, McLeod RS, et al. Ileal reservoirs. In: Michelassi F, Milsom JW, editors. Operative strategies in inflammatory bowel disease. New York: Springer; 1999. p. 186.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Branco BC, Sachar DB, Heimann TM, Sarpel U, Harpaz N, Greenstein AJ. Adenocarcinoma following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: review of 26 cases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15(2):295–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Sukhni W, McLeod RS, Macrae H, O’connor B, Huang H, Cohen Z. Oncologic outcome in patients with ulcerative colitis associated with dysplasia or cancer who underwent stapled or handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(11):1495–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kariv R, Remzi FH, Lian L, Bennett AE, Kiran RP, Kariv Y, et al. Preoperative colorectal neoplasia increases risk for pouch neoplasia in patients with restorative proctocolectomy. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(3):806–12, 812.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, Dunlop MG, Thomas HJ, Evans GD, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut. 2010;59(5):666–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed AU, Keus F, Heikens JT, Bemelman WA, Berdah SV, Gooszen HG, et al. Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD006267.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, van Deventer SJ, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2004;240(6):984–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weston-Petrides GK, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Nicholls RJ, Mortensen NJ, et al. Comparison of outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Arch Surg. 2008;143(4):406–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. da Luz MA, Kiran RP, Lavery I. Clinical outcomes of ileorectal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 2010;97(1):65–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Hartley B.Sc. (Hons), M.D., FRCS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beral, D.L., Hartley, J.E. (2012). Surgical Options in Ulcerative Colitis. In: Brown, S., Hartley, J., Hill, J., Scott, N., Williams, J. (eds) Contemporary Coloproctology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-889-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-889-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-888-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-889-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics