Skip to main content

Early Colorectal Cancer Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Coloproctology

Abstract

Early cancer can be considered to be malignant disease confined to the muscularis propria of the colon or rectum. The real challenge in early cancer is to differentiate those patients who truly have early disease from those with a primary tumor confined to the bowel wall and metastatic disease. The challenge is significant because in early cancer, nodal metastatic disease is often microscopic. If we were able to exclude metastatic disease, treatment decisions would be relatively simple. If the lesion were excised luminally, by polypectomy, EMR or TEMS, the only consideration post resection would be whether there was an adequate excision margin on histological examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot Group. Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 2004;329:133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkin WS, Cook CF, Cuzick J, Edwards R, Northover JM, Wardle J, UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial Investigators. Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1291–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liberman D, Moravec M, et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1100–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Altendorf-Hofmann A, et al. Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenoma assessed by size and site. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12:267–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Absar MS, Haboubi NY. Colonic neoplastic polyps: biopsy is not efficient to exclude malignancy. The Trafford experience. Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8:S257–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown SR, Baraza W. Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD006439.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haggitt RC, Glotzbach RE, Soffer EE, Wruble LD. Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 1985;89:328–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hassan C, Zullo A, Risio M, Rossini FP, Morini S. Histologic risk factors and clinical outcome in colorectal malignant polyp: a pooled-data analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1588–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Colacchio TA, Ford KA, Scantlebury VP. Endoscopic polypectomy: inadequate treatment for invasive colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 1981;194:704–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Royal College of Pathologists Dataset Standards and Datasets for Reporting Cancers. Dataset for colorectal cancer, 2nd edn. 2007. http://www.rcpath.org/resources/pdf/G049-ColorectalDataset-Sep07.pdf.

  11. Copper HS, Deppisch LM, Gourley WK, et al. Endoscopically removed malignant colorectal polyps: clinicopathologic correlations. Gastroenterology. 1995;108:1657–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Christoforidis D, Cho HM, Dixon MR, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus conventional transanal excision for patients with early rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249:776–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Middleton PF, Sutherland LM, Maddern GJ. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:270–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bach SP, Hill J, Monson JR, et al. A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:280–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee W, Lee D, Choi S, Chun H. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1283–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Winde G, Nottberg H, Keller R, Schmid KW, Bunte H. Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:969–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Borschitz T, Heintz A, Junginger T. The influence of histopathologic criteria on the long-term prognosis of locally excised pT1 rectal carcinomas: results of local excision (transanal endoscopic microsurgery) and immediate reoperation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1492–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Floyd ND, Saclarides TJ. Transanal endoscopic resection of pT1 rectal tumours. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:164–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ganai S, Kanumuri P, Rao RS, Alexander AL. Local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal polyps and early cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:547–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsai BM, Finne CO, Nordenstam JF, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery resection of rectal tumours: outcomes and recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:16–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Doornebosch PG, Ferenschild FT, de Wilt JH, et al. Treatment of recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1234–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Endreseth BH, Myrvold HE, Romundstad P, Hestvik UE, Bjerkeset T, Wibe A. Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1380–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bentrem DJ, Okabe S, Wong WD, et al. T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: transanal excision or radical surgery? Ann Surg. 2005;242:472–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nascimbeni R, Burgart LJ, Nivatvongs S, Larson DR. Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:200–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:693–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Law WL, Chu KW. Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:260–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hendren SK, O’Connor BI, Liu M, et al. Prevalence of male and female sexual dysfunction is high following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2005;242:212–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kneist W, Heintz A, Junginger T. Major urinary dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2005;92:230–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams N, Seow-Choen F. Physiological and functional outcome following ultra-low anterior resection with colon pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1029–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG, et al. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1353–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kikuchi R, Takano M, Takagi K, et al. Management of early invasive colorectal cancer. Risk of recurrence and clinical guidelines. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:1286–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, et al. Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:385–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, Paganini A, et al. Long term results in patients with T2–3 N0 distal rectal cancer undergoing radiotherapy before transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1546–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith FM, Waldron D, Winter DC. Rectum-conserving surgery in the era of chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg. 2010;97(12):1752–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mentges B, Buess G, Efinger G, Manncke K, Becker HD. Indications and results of local treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1997;84:348–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim Hill M.B.Ch.B., M.Ch., FRCS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hill, J. (2012). Early Colorectal Cancer Management. In: Brown, S., Hartley, J., Hill, J., Scott, N., Williams, J. (eds) Contemporary Coloproctology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-889-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-889-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-888-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-889-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics