Advertisement

Oogenesis pp 3-16 | Cite as

Imaging Strategies for Studying Mammalian Oogenesis

  • S. Darlene Limback
  • David F. AlbertiniEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.6k Downloads

Abstract

Advances in biomedical imaging are now impacting the evaluation of gonads and gametes in experimental animal model systems and human clinical specimens. This chapter summarizes the rationale for both live cell and fixed sample imaging using light microscopy. Useful protocols, detailed methods, and tools for data extraction are covered for a variety of applications pertaining to the analysis of oocytes, embryos, and intact ovarian tissue.

Keywords

Oogenesis Confocal microscopy Sample fixation Sample processing Vital staining Image processing Image archiving 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the many colleagues and friends who have worked in the lab to advance the perspectives of oocyte biology that we enjoy today. Special thanks go to Lynda McGinnis and Britta Mattson who at different ends of the spectrum contributed to the development of MTSB-XF. Finally, this chapter would not have been possible without the funding from the NIH, ESHE Fund, The March of Dimes, and the Hall Family Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Rodrigues P, Limback D, McGinnis LK, Plancha CE, Albertini DF. Oogenesis: prospects and challenges for the future. J Cell Physiol. 2008;216:355–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGee EA, Hsueh AJ. Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles. Endocr Rev. 2000;21:200–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nilsson E, Skinner MK. Cellular interactions that control primordial follicle development and folliculogenesis. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2001;8:S17–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park CE, Cha KY, Kim K, Lee KA. Expression of cell cycle regulatory genes during primordial-primary follicle transition in the mouse ovary. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:410–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yoon SJ, Kim KH, Chung HM, Choi DH, Lee WS, Cha KY, Lee KA. Gene expression profiling of early follicular development in primordial, primary, and secondary follicles. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:193–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eppig JJ. Oocyte control of ovarian follicular development and function in mammals. Reproduction. 2001;122:829–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peters H, Byskov AG, Himelstein-Braw R, Faber M. Follicular growth: the basic event in the mouse and human ovary. J Reprod Fertil. 1975;45:559–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Driancourt MA, Reynaud K, Cortvrindt R, Smitz J. Roles of KIT and KIT LIGAND in ovarian function. Rev Reprod. 2000;5:143–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hreinsson JG, Scott JE, Rasmussen C, Swahn ML, Hsueh AJ, Hovatta O. Growth differentiation factor-9 promotes the growth, development, and survival of human ovarian follicles in organ culture. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:316–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayashi M, McGee EA, Min G, Klein C, Rose UM, van Duin M, Hsueh AJ. Recombinant growth differentiation factor-9 (GDF-9) enhances growth and differentiation of cultured early ovarian follicles. Endocrinology. 1999;140:1236–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun QY, Liu K, Kikuchi K. Oocyte-specific knockout: a novel in vivo approach for studying gene functions during folliculogenesis, oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryogenesis. Biol Reprod. 2008;79:1014–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oktem O, Urman B. Understanding follicle growth in vivo. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2944–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krysko DV, Diez-Fraile A, Criel G, Svistunov AA, Vandenabeele P, D’Herde K. Life and death of female gametes during oogenesis and folliculogenesis. Apoptosis. 2008;13:1065–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tatone C, Amicarelli F, Carbone MC, Monteleone P, Caserta D, Marci R, Artini PG, Piomboni P, Focarelli R. Cellular and molecular aspects of ovarian follicle ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:131–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Albertini DF, Combelles CM, Benecchi E, Carabatsos MJ. Cellular basis for paracrine regulation of ovarian follicle development. Reproduction. 2001;121:647–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Albertini DF. The structural basis of oocyte-granulosa cell communication. Ernst Schering Res Found Workshop. 2002;101–10.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Albertini DF, Barrett SL. Oocyte-somatic cell communication. Reprod Suppl. 2003;61:49–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Combelles CM, Carabatsos MJ, Kumar TR, Matzuk MM, Albertini DF. Hormonal control of somatic cell oocyte interactions during ovarian follicle development. Mol Reprod Dev. 2004;69:347–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li Q, McKenzie LJ, Matzuk MM. Revisiting oocyte-somatic cell interactions: in search of novel intrafollicular predictors and regulators of oocyte developmental competence. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:673–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gilchrist RB, Lane M, Thompson JG. Oocyte-secreted factors: regulators of cumulus cell function and oocyte quality. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:159–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Norris RP, Freudzon M, Mehlmann LM, Cowan AE, Simon AM, Paul DL, Lampe PD, Jaffe LA. Luteinizing hormone causes MAP kinase-dependent phosphorylation and closure of connexin 43 gap junctions in mouse ovarian follicles: one of two paths to meiotic resumption. Development. 2008;135:3229–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Norris RP, Ratzan WJ, Freudzon M, Mehlmann LM, Krall J, Movsesian MA, Wang H, Ke H, Nikolaev VO, Jaffe LA. Cyclic GMP from the surrounding somatic cells regulates cyclic AMP and meiosis in the mouse oocyte. Development. 2009;136:1869–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Norris RP, Freudzon M, Nikolaev VO, Jaffe LA. Epidermal growth factor receptor kinase activity is required for gap junction closure and for part of the decrease in ovarian follicle cGMP in response to LH. Reproduction. 2010;140:655–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Su YQ, Sugiura K, Wigglesworth K, O’Brien MJ, Affourtit JP, Pangas SA, Matzuk MM, Eppig JJ. Oocyte regulation of metabolic cooperativity between mouse cumulus cells and oocytes: BMP15 and GDF9 control cholesterol biosynthesis in cumulus cells. Development. 2008;135:111–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Su YQ, Sugiura K, Eppig JJ. Mouse oocyte control of granulosa cell development and function: paracrine regulation of cumulus cell metabolism. Semin Reprod Med. 2009;27:32–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Webb R, Garnsworthy PC, Gong JG, Armstrong DG. Control of follicular growth: local interactions and nutritional influences. J Anim Sci. 2004;82 E-Suppl:E63–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fair T. Follicular oocyte growth and acquisition of developmental competence. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;78:203–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kidder GM, Vanderhyden BC. Bidirectional communication between oocytes and follicle cells: ensuring oocyte developmental competence. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2010;88:399–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yeo CX, Gilchrist RB, Lane M. Disruption of bidirectional oocyte-cumulus paracrine signaling during in vitro maturation reduces subsequent mouse oocyte developmental competence. Biol Reprod. 2009;80:1072–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McGinnis LK, Albertini DF. Dynamics of protein phosphorylation during meiotic maturation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:169–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Luciano AM, Franciosi F, Modina SC, Lodde V. Gap junction-mediated communications regulate chromatin remodeling during bovine oocyte growth and differentiation through cAMP-dependent mechanism(s). Biol Reprod. 2011;85:1252–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mattson BA, Albertini DF. Oogenesis: chromatin and microtubule dynamics during meiotic prophase. Mol Reprod Dev. 1990;25:374–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mehlmann LM. Stops and starts in mammalian oocytes: recent advances in understanding the regulation of meiotic arrest and oocyte maturation. Reproduction. 2005;130:791–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang M, Su YQ, Sugiura K, Xia G, Eppig JJ. Granulosa cell ligand NPPC and its receptor NPR2 maintain meiotic arrest in mouse oocytes. Science. 2010;330:366–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang M, Su YQ, Sugiura K, Wigglesworth K, Xia G, Eppig JJ. Estradiol promotes and maintains cumulus cell expression of natriuretic peptide receptor 2 (NPR2) and meiotic arrest in mouse oocytes in vitro. Endocrinology. 2011;152:4377–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wang HX, Tekpetey FR, Kidder GM. Identification of WNT/beta-CATENIN signaling pathway components in human cumulus cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;15:11–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Marteil G, Richard-Parpaillon L, Kubiak JZ. Role of oocyte quality in meiotic maturation and embryonic development. Reprod Biol. 2009;9:203–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Senbon S, Hirao Y, Miyano T. Interactions between the oocyte and surrounding somatic cells in follicular development: lessons from in vitro culture. J Reprod Dev. 2003;49:259–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Picton HM, Harris SE, Muruvi W, Chambers EL. The in vitro growth and maturation of follicles. Reproduction. 2008;136:703–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Combelles CM, Albertini DF, Racowsky C. Distinct microtubule and chromatin characteristics of human oocytes after failed in-vivo and in-vitro meiotic maturation. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2124–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Barrett SL, Albertini DF. Cumulus cell contact during oocyte maturation in mice regulates meiotic spindle positioning and enhances developmental competence. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:29–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Segers I, Adriaenssens T, Ozturk E, Smitz J. Acquisition and loss of oocyte meiotic and developmental competence during in vitro antral follicle growth in mouse. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2695–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ebner T, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Shebl O, Tews G. Incomplete denudation of oocytes prior to ICSI enhances embryo quality and blastocyst development. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2972–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang HX, Tong D, El Gehani F, Tekpetey FR, Kidder GM. Connexin expression and gap junctional coupling in human cumulus cells: contribution to embryo quality. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:972–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Eppig JJ, O’Brien MJ, Wigglesworth K, Nicholson A, Zhang W, King BA. Effect of in vitro maturation of mouse oocytes on the health and lifespan of adult offspring. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:922–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular and Integrative PhysiologyKansas University Medical CenterKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Center for Reproductive Sciences, Institute for Reproductive Health and Regenerative MedicineKansas University Medical CenterKansas CityUSA
  3. 3.Department of PhysiologyKansas University Medical CenterKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations