Artificial Intelligence: Summary and Hybrid Schemes

  • Waldemar Rebizant
  • Janusz Szafran
  • Andrzej Wiszniewski
Part of the Signals and Communication Technology book series (SCT)


The artificial intelligence methods presented in Chaps. 11–14 require a lot of computational power but, in return, provide flexibility and possibility of handling imprecise or missing data. Despite their differences, they all offer soft-signal processing skills, thus one can say that they all form a family of soft computing that can be defined as follows:


Fuzzy Rule Fuzzy Inference System Synchronous Machine Firing Strength Adaptive Network Fuzzy Inference System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Assis TML, Nonara AA, Valentini TM (2009) Power system dynamic security assessment through a neuro-fuzzy scheme. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on intelligent system applications to power systems, Curitiba, Brazil, Paper 48Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fuller R (2000) Introduction to neuro-fuzzy systems. Physica-Verlag, Springer, HeidelbergMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang DW, Han XS (2009) Study on generation companies’ bidding strategy based on hybrid intelligent method. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on hybrid intelligent systems, Shenyang, China, Paper C14-06Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jang JSR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:665–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiartzis SJ, Bakirtzis AG, Theocharis JB, Tsagas G (2000) A fuzzy expert system for peak load forecasting. Application to the Greek power system. In: Proceedings of the 10th mediterranean electrotechnical conference, vol 3. pp 1097–1100Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khosla R, Dillon T (1992) A neuro-expert system architecture with application to alarm processing in a power system control centre. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on tools with artificial intelligence, pp 471–472Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kochukuttan H, Chandrasekaran A (1997) Development of a fuzzy expert system for power quality applications. In: Proceedings of the 29th southeastern symposium on system theory, pp 239–243Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kosko B (1992) Neural networks and fuzzy systems. A dynamical systems approach to machine intelligence. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kung CH, Devaney MJ, Huang CM, Kung CM (1997) Fuzzy-based adaptive digital power metering using a genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conference, vol 1. pp 218–221Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kwan HK, Cai T (1994) A fuzzy neural network and its application to pattern recognition. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Menniti D, Burgio A, Pinnarelli A, Sorrentino N, Costanzo A (2007) Fuzzy stabilizers tuned by genetic algorithm in order to improve power system oscillation damping. In: Proceedings of the international conference on power engineering, energy and electrical drives, pp 291–299Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monsef H, Ranjbar AM, Jadid S (1997) Fuzzy rule-based expert system for power system fault diagnosis. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 144:186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nauck D, Klawonn F, Kruse R (1997) Foundations of neuro-fuzzy systems. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pandi VR, Panigrahi BK, Mallick MK, Abraham A, Das S (2009) Improved harmony search for economic power dispatch. In: Proceedigs of the 9th international conference on hybrid intelligent systems, Shenyang, China, Paper C14-05Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rebizant W, Feser K (2001) Fuzzy logic application to out-of-step protection of generators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE PES summer meeting, Vancouver, Canada, Paper 01SM061Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rebizant W, Feser K (2001) Out-of-step protection with AI methods. In: Proceedings of the 7th international IEE conference developments in power system protection, pp 295–298Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roizman O, Davydov V (1999) Neuro-fuzzy computing for large power transformers monitoring and diagnostics. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, pp 248–252Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tan JC, Crossley PA, Mclaren PG (2001) Fuzzy expert system for on-line fault diagnosis on a transmission network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE power engineering society winter meeting, Columbus, OH, vol 2. pp 775–780Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vuorimaa P (1994) Fuzzy self-organizing map. Fuzzy Sets Syst 66:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang B, Wu J, Yang J, Zhao S (2004) A distributed hybrid wind-solar power control system based on genetic algorithm and hierarchical fuzzy control. In: Proceedings of the 5th world congress on intelligent control and automation, vol 6. pp 5185–5188Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yoshimoto K, Yasuda K, Yokoyama R (1995) Transmission expansion planning using neuro-computing hybridized with genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation, Perth, WA, doi: 10.1109/ICEC.1995.489129
  22. 22.
    Zhang N, Kezunovic M (1995) Coordinating fuzzy ART neural networks to improve transmission line fault detection and classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE general meeting, vol 1. pp 734–740Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Waldemar Rebizant
    • 1
  • Janusz Szafran
    • 1
  • Andrzej Wiszniewski
    • 1
  1. 1.Wroclaw University of TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations