Manufacturer Competition and Subsidies to Suppliers

  • Adam A. Wadecki
  • Volodymyr Babich
  • Owen Q. Wu


Dealing with risky suppliers is a part of everyday business for manufacturers. For example, the domestic automotive supply industry has faced numerous hardships as some of its largest firms have flirted with bankruptcy, or have been subsumed by Chap 11 over the past few years. Nearly 30% of the pre-existing North American automotive supply base had filed for bankruptcy by the end of 2008. Half are predicted to file for bankruptcy before the end of 2010.


Supply Chain Consumer Surplus Initial Public Offering Future Contract Retail Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    A. T. Kearney (2009) More than half of the automotive supply base could go bankrupt in 2009; at least 1 million job losses expected. more-than-half-of-the-automotive-supply-base-could-go-bankrupt-in-2009.html
  2. 2.
    Babich V (2010) Independence of capacity ordering and financial subsidies to risky suppliers. Manuf Serv Oper Manag, Published online before print February 16, 2010Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deo S, Corbett C (2009) Cournot competition under yield uncertainty: the case of the U.S. influenza market. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 11(4):563–576Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gerchak Y, Parlar M (1990) Yield randomness, cost tradeoffs and diversification in the EOQ model. Nav Res Logist 37(3):341–354MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harvey D (2009) Happier times ahead for auto suppliers?
  6. 6.
    Haywood K (2009) GM helps axle maker avoid Chapter 11. Wall Str J 18 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hendricks K, Singhal V (1995) An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Prod Oper Manag 14(1):35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heyman D, Sobel MJ (2004) Stochastic models in operations research, vol 2, DoverGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jarrow R, Turnbull S (1995) Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk. J Finance 50(1):53–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Merton R (1974) On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J Finance 29(2):449–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silver E (1976) Establishing the order quantity when the amount received is uncertain. INFOR 14(1):32–39MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang S, Kouvelis P (2009) Supplier diversification strategies in the presence of yield uncertainty and buyer competition. Working paper, University of MiamiGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Treece J (2010) Auto suppliers to get revised contract terms Chrysler group. Crain’s Detroit Business, 11 JuneGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yano C, Lee H (1995) Lot sizing with random yields: a review. Oper Res 43(2):311–334MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam A. Wadecki
    • 1
  • Volodymyr Babich
    • 2
  • Owen Q. Wu
    • 3
  1. 1.Industrial and Operations EngineeringUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.McDonough School of BusinessGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Ross School of BusinessUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations