Risk Assessment of Supply Chain During New Product Development: Applications in Discrete and Process Manufacturing Industries

  • Atanu Chaudhuri
  • Kashi N. Singh


Supply chains have become increasingly global and complex over the years with manufacturers sourcing raw materials and components from geographically-dispersed suppliers. Reduced costs, access to capacity, focus on core activities, etc are some of the advantages associated with outsourcing different aspects of product development, manufacturing and logistics. However, managing a complex network of global suppliers and sub-contractors to ensure cost-effective, high-quality and timely deliveries has become a daunting task for practicing managers. Moreover, customers have become increasingly demanding and there is pressure on companies across industries to develop and launch a wide variety of products in shorter time. To manage a complex supply network, it is an imperative that supply chain decisions are made integral part of the new product planning. Any glitch in the global supply chain not only will raise costs related to the remedial actions which are required after the occurrence of the event but also can delay the launch of products with serious financial losses to the participating companies in the supply chain.


Supply Chain Product Development Analytic Hierarchy Process Risk Priority Number Supply Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



An earlier version of this paper was published in the proceedings of the PDMA India IV Annual International Conference, NPDC 09 held at Indian Institute of Technology, Madras between December 17 and 19, 2009. The authors thank the conference participants and reviewers for their valuable comments.


  1. 1.
    Austin AT (1998) Unlocking the supply chain’s hidden value: a lesson from the personal computer industry. Supply Chain Manag Rev 2:24Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blackhurst J, Craighead CW, Elkins D et al (2005) An empirically derived agenda for critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. Int J Prod Res 43(19):4067–4081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bozdogan K, Deyst J, Hoult D et al (1998) Architectural innovation in product development through early supplier integration. R&D Manag 28(3):163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chaudhuri A, Singh KN (2009) Vulnerability analysis and risk assessment during new product development: an integrated approach using AHP and FMEA. In: Proceedings of PDMA India IV international conference, NPDC, new product development: challenges in meltdown times, IIT Madras, India, 17–19 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark KB (1989) Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Manag Sci 35(10):1247–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dowlatshahi S (1999) A modeling approach to logistics in concurrent engineering. Eur J Oper Res 115(1):59–76MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaudenzi B (2008) Assessing risks in projects and processes. In: Zsidisin GA, Ritchie B (eds) Supply chain risk—a handbook of assessment, management and performance. Springer, New York, pp 67–81Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giunipero LC, Eltantawy RA (2004) Securing the upstream supply chain: a risk management approach. Int J Phys Distribution Logist Manag 34(9):698–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hartley JL, Zirger BJ, Kamath RR (1997) Managing the buyer–supplier interface for on-time performance in product development. J Oper Manag 15:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoult DP (1997) Product development with suppliers—the role of database commonality. Society of automotive engineers (SAE) technical paper series, #970776, sp-1266, 7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johansson E, Bellgran M, Johansson MI (2006) Evaluation of materials supply systems during product development projects. Int J Prod Res 44(5):903–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kamath R, Liker JK (1994) A second look at Japanese product development. Harv Bus Rev 72(6): 154–160 (November–December)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee AH (2009) A fuzzy AHP evaluation model for buyer–supplier relationships with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Int J Prod Res 47(15):4255–4280MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martin MV, Ishii K (2000) Design for variety: a methodology for developing product platform architectures. ASME design engineering technical conferences, Baltimore, ASMAGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mayer KJ, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2004) Are supply and plant inspections complements or substitutes? a strategic and operational assessment of inspection practices in biotechnology. Manag Sci 50(8):1064–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ragatz GL, Handfield RB, Scannell TB (1997) Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. J Prod Innov Manag 14:190–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sinha PR, Whitman LE, Malzahn D (2004) Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain. Suppl Chain Manag: Int J 9(2):154–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thomke S, Fujimoto T (2000) The effect of “front-loading” problem-solving on product development performance. J Prod Innov Manag 17:128–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169(1):1–29MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ward A, Liker JK, Cristiano JJ et al (1995) The second Toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make cars faster. Sloan Manag Rev 36(3):43–61Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu T, Blackhurst J, Chidambaram V (2006) A model for inbound supply risk analysis. Comput Industry 57:350–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zsidisin GA, Ellram LM, Carter JR et al (2004) An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques. Int J Phys Distribution Logist Manag 34(5):397–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of ManagementLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations