Methods and Tools for Knowledge Sharing in Product Development

  • Marco Bertoni
  • Christian Johansson
  • Tobias C. Larsson


The emerging industrial business partnerships, which feature cross-functional and cross-company development efforts, raise the barrier for the establishment of effective knowledge sharing practises in the larger organization. This chapter aims to highlight the role of knowledge as a key enabler for effective engineering activities in the light of such emerging enterprise collaboration models. Knowledge enabled engineering (KEE) is presented as an approach to enhance the extended organization’s capability to establish effective collaboration among its parts, in spite of different organizational structures, technologies or processes. KEE is analyzed in its constituent parts, highlighting areas, methods and tools that are particularly interesting for leveraging companies’ knowledge sharing capabilities.


Knowledge Sharing Knowledge Worker Product Development Process Virtual Enterprise Knowledge Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Beck P (2005) Collaboration vs. integration: implications of a knowledge-based future for the AEC industry. Design intelligence web. Accessed Sep 2009
  2. 2.
    Mathew GE (2002) The state-of-the-art technologies and practises for enterprise business collaboration—an overview. Infosys technologies ltd. Accessed Dec 2010
  3. 3.
    Greising D, Johnsson J (2007) Behind Boeing’s 787 delays. Chicago Tribune. Accessed Dec 2010
  4. 4.
    N N (2010) Press centre. Airbus S.A.S. Accessed Dec 2010
  5. 5.
    McElroy MW (2003) The new knowledge management: complexity, learning, and sustainable innovation. KMCI Press/Butterworth-Heinemann, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kern EM, Kersten W (2007) Framework for internet-supported interorganizational product development collaboration. J Enterp Inf Manag 20(5):562–577Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davidow WH, Malone MS (1993) The virtual corporation: structuring and revitalizing the corporation for the 21st century. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malone TW, Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput Surv 26(1):88–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bordeau J, Wasson B (1997) Orchestrating collaboration in collaborative telelearning. In: du Boulay B, Mizoguchi R (eds) Artificial intelligence in education. IOS Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reed CA, Long DP Collaboration, Cooperation and dialogue classification. In: Pollack ME (ed) IJCAI-97: Working notes of the lJCAI’97 workshop on collaboration, cooperation and conflict in dialogue systems, Nagoya, JapanGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walton DN, Krabbe ECW (1995) Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Studies in syntax, Vol III. Seminar Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Browne J, Zhang J (1999) Extended and virtual enterprises-similarities and differences. Int J Agile Manag Syst 1(1):30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ericksen PD, Suri R (2001) Managing the extended enterprise. Purch Today 12(2):1–7Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boardman JT, Clegg BT (2001) Structured engagement in the extended enterprise. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(5/6):795–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pardessus T (2001) The multi-site extended enterprise concept in the aeronautical industry. Air Space Europe 3(4):46–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hardwick M, Bolton R (1997) The industrial virtual enterprise. Commun ACM 40(9):59–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Larsson A (2005) Engineering know-who: why social connectedness matters to global design teams. Doctoral thesis. Luleå University of Technology, LuleåGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katzy BR, Dissel M (2001) A toolset for building the virtual enterprise. J Intell Manuf 12:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Allen T (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brown JS, Duguid P (2000) The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Herbsleb JD, Mockus A, Finholt TA et al (2000) Distance, Dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. In: SIGGROUP (ed) CSCW 2000: Computer supported cooperative work: ACM 2000 Conference on computer supported cooperative work, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lipnack J, Stamps J (1997) Virtual teams. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ, Kaplan RS (1995) The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard business review (Jul-Aug):57–71Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loebecke C, van Fenema PC, Powell P (1999) Co-opetition and knowledge transfer. Data Base Adv Inf Syst 30(2):14–25Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Appleyard MM (1996) How does knowledge flow? interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strateg Manag J 17:137–154Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    N N (2009) Accessed Sep 2009
  28. 28.
    N N (2007) VIVACE Project. Accessed Jan 2011
  29. 29.
    Sellini F, Cloonan J, Carver E et al (2006) Collaboration across the extended enterprise: barriers and opportunities to develop your knowledge assets? In: Horvath I, Duhovnik J (eds) Tools and methods of competitive engineering-proceedings TMCE 2006 conference. Ljubljana, SloveniaGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sandberg M (2005) Knowledge enabled engineering design tools for manufacturability evaluation of jet engine components. Licentiate thesis. Luleå University of Technology, LuleåGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Isaksson O (2003) A generative modeling approach to engineering design. In: Folkeson A, Gralen K, Norell M et al (eds) Proceedings ICED 03, the 14th international conference on engineering design, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nergård H (2006) Knowledge enabled engineering systems in product development: towards cross company collaboration. Licentiate thesis. Luleå University of Technology, LuleåGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McAfee A (2006) Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 47(3):21–28Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Larsson A, Ericson Å, Larsson T et al (2008) Engineering 2.0: exploring lightweight technologies for the virtual enterprise. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on the design of cooperative systems. Carry-Le-RouetGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bughin J (2009) How companies are benefiting from Web 2.0: McKinsey global survey results. mckinsey quarterly. Accessed Dec 2010
  36. 36.
    Richards D (2009) Social software/web 2.0 approach to collaborative knowledge engineering. Int J Inf Sci 179:2515–2523Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maalej W, Happel HJ (2008) A lightweight approach for knowledge sharing in distributed software teams. In: Yamaguchi T (ed) Practical aspects of knowledge management, 7th international conference, PAKM 2008, Yokohama, Japan, Nov 22–23, 2008Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Patrick K, Dotsika F (2007) Knowledge sharing: developing from within. Learn Organ J 14(5):395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ciavola BT, Gershenson JK (2009) Establishment of an open, Wiki-based online resource for collaboration in the field of product family design. In: Norell Bergendahl M, Grimheden M, Leifer L (eds) Proceedings of ICED’09, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Millen D, Feinberg J, Kerr B (2006) Social bookmarking inn the enterprise. IBM. Accessed Jan 2011
  41. 41.
    Høimyr N, Jones PL (2007) Wikis supporting PLM and technical documentation. In: Schmitt R (ed) Holistic PLM implementation-mastering the organisational change behind the obvious. Eurostep proceedings, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hawryszkiewycz IT (2007) Lightweight technologies for knowledge based collaborative applications. In: Proceedings of IEEE joint conference on e-commerce technology and enterprise computing, E-commerce and E-services, IEEE computer society, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    N N (2011) Vuuch enterprise social system. Accessed Jan 2011
  44. 44.
    Sanghee K, Bracewell RH, Wallace KM (2007) Improving design reuse using context. In: Bocquet JC (ed) Proceedings of ICED 2007, The 16th international conference on engineering design, ParisGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kirsch-Pinheiro M, Villanova-Oliver M, Gensel J et al (2005) Context-aware filtering for collaborative web systems: adapting the awareness information to the user’s context. In: Liebrock LM (ed) Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on applied computing. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    De Liddo A, Buckingham Shum S (2010) Cohere: a prototype for contested collective intelligence. Workshop on collective intelligence in organizations. In: Quinn KI, Gutwin C, Tang JC (ed) Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, ACM, SavannahGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Prekop P, Burnett M (2003) Activities, context and ubiquitous computing. Comput Commun 26(11):1168–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gustavsen RM (2002) Condor—an application framework for mobility-based context-aware applications. In: Ljungstrand P, Holmquist LE (eds) Adjunct proceedings UBICOMP 2002. GöteborgGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Redon R, Larsson A, Leblond R et al (2007) VIVACE context based search platform. In: Kokinov B, Richardson DC, Roth-Berghofer ThR et al (eds) Modeling and using context: 6th international and interdisciplinary conference, CONTEXT 2007, RoskildeGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Heisig P, Caldwell NHM, Grebici K et al (2010) Exploring knowledge and information needs in engineering from the past and for the future e results from a survey. Des Stud, doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2010.05.001
  51. 51.
    Hooey BL, Foyle DC (2007) Requirements for a design rationale capture tool to support NASA’s complex systems. In: Proceedings of 3rd international workshop on managing knowledge for space missions. PasadenaGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Klein M (1993) Capturing design rationale in concurrent engineering teams. IEEE Comput J 26(1):39–47Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bracewell R, Gourtovaia M, Moss M et al (2009) DRed 2.0: a method and tool for capture and communication of design knowledge deliberated in the creation of technical products. In: Norell Bergendahl M, Grimheden M, Leifer L (eds) Proceedings of ICED’09, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gross MD (1996) The electronic cocktail napkin–computer support for working with diagrams. Des Stud 17(1):53–69Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shipman FM, McCall RJ (1997) Integrating different perspectives on design rationale: supporting the emergence of design rationale from design communication. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 11(2):141–154Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hu X, Pang J, Pang Y et al (2000) A survey on design rationale: representation, capture and retrieval. Proceedings of ASME DETC/CIE 2000, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Conklin EJ, Yakemovic KCB (1991) A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Hum Comput Interact 6(3–4):357–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Goodwin R, Chung PWH (1997) An integrated framework for representing design history. J Appl Applied Intell 7(2):167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chandrasekaran B, Goel AK, Iwasaki Y (1993) Functional representation as design rationale. IEEE Comput Soc Press 26(1):48–56Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Medeiros A, Schwabe D, Feijó B (2005) Kuaba ontology: design rationale representation and reuse in model-based designs. Lect Notes Comput Sc 241–255Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jin Y, Ishino Y (2006) DAKA: design activity knowledge acquisition through data-mining. Int J Prod Res 44(14):2813–2837MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Saridakis KM, Dentsoras AJ (2007) Soft computing in engineering design-a review. Adv Eng Inform 22(2):202–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    N N (2010) CoPe_it!. Accessed Jan 2011
  64. 64.
    Ryskamp JD, Jensen CG, Mix K et al (2010) Leveraging design rationale to improve collaborative co-design CAD environments. In: Horváth I, Mandorlini F, Rusák Z (eds) Proceedings of TMCE 2010 symposium. AnconaGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sung R, Ritchiea JM, Reab HJ et al (2010) Automated design knowledge capture and representation in single-user CAD environments. J Eng Des doi: 10.1080/09544820903527187
  66. 66.
    Conway A, William I, Andrew L (2009) Knowledge enahnched notes (KEN). In: Norell Bergendahl M, Grimheden M, Leifer L (eds) Proceedings of ICED’09, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. wired magazine. Accessed Jan 2011
  68. 68.
    Pitta DA, Fowler D (2005) Online consumer communities and their value to new product developers. J Prod Brand Manag 14(5):283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ribiere MV, Tuggle FD (2009) Fostering innovation with KM 2.0 VINE. J Inform Knowl Manag Sys 40(1):90–101Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Di Gangi PM, Wasko M (2009) Steal my idea! organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: a case study of dell ideastorm. Decis Support Sys 48(1):303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Smith D, Valdes R (2005) Web 2.0: get ready for the next old thing. Gartner research paper, Stamford, CTGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Füller J, Bartl M, Ernst H et al (2006) Community based innovation: how to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development. Electron Commer Res 6:57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Tseng MM, Jiao RJ, Wang C (2010) Design for mass personalization. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59:175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Cross N (1982) Designerly ways of knowing. Des Stud 3(4):221–227Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Flanagan T, Eckert C, Clarkson PJ (2007) Externalizing tacit overview knowledge: a model-based approach to supporting design teams. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 21:227–242Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rosenzweig P (2007) Misunderstanding the nature of company performance: the halo effect and other business delusions. Calif Manag Rev 49(4):6–20Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Simon HA (1997) Rational decision making in business organizations. Am Econ Rev 69(4):493–513Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Grebici K, Goh YM, Zhao S et al (2007) Information maturity approach for the handling of uncertainty within a collaborative design team. In: Bannon L, Wagner I, Gutwin C et al (eds) Proceedings of the 10th european conference on computer supported cooperative work. LimerickGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Johansson C (2009) Knowledge maturity as decision support in stage-gate product development: a case from the aerospace industry. Doctoral thesis. Luleå University of Technology, LuleåGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Bertoni
    • 1
  • Christian Johansson
    • 1
  • Tobias C. Larsson
    • 2
  1. 1.Luleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden
  2. 2.Blekinge Institute of TechnologyKarlskronaSweden

Personalised recommendations