Advertisement

Metric-Based Simulation Training

  • Anthony G. Gallagher
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
Chapter
Part of the Improving Medical Outcome - Zero Tolerance book series (IMOZT)

Abstract

Computer-based simulation has several advantages when compared with conventional methods for surgical training. One major advantage is that the same experience or sequence of events can be replicated repeatedly. This repetition allows the trainee to learn from mistakes in a safe environment. Another benefit which is probably of equal if not more omportance is the objective feedback a trainee can receive. Since everything a trainee “does” on a computer-based simulator is essentially data, all actions can be tracked.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Virtual Reality Operational Definition Trained Group Surgical Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, et al. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg. 2007;193(6):797-804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carroll SM, Kennedy AM, Traynor O, Gallagher AG. Objective assessment of surgical performance and its impact on a national selection programme of candidates for higher surgical training in plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(12):1543-1549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Datta V, Chang A, Mackay S, Darzi A. The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments. Am J Surg. 2002;184(1):70-73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fitts PM, Peterson JR. Information capacity of discrete motor responses. J Exp Psychol. 1964;67(2):103-112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM. Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(10):1525-1529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gallagher AG, Satava RM. Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(12):1746-1752.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gallagher AG, Richie K, McClure N, McGuigan J. Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality. World J Surg. 2001;25(11):1478-1483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallagher AG, Neary P, Gillen P, et al. Novel method for assessment and selection of trainees for higher surgical training in general surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(4):282-290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher AG, Leonard G, Traynor OJ. Role and feasibility of psychomotor and dexterity testing in selection for surgical training. Aust N Z J Surg. 2009;79(3):108-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knobe J. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis. 2003;63(3):190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997;84(2):273-278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):458-463. discussion 463-454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith SG, Torkington J, Brown TJ, Taffinder NJ, Darzi A. Motion analysis. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(4):640-645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Van Sickle K, Baghai M, Huang IP, Goldenberg A, Smith CD, Ritter EM. Construct validity of an objective assessment method for laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot tying. Am J Surg. 2008a;196(1):74-80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, Baghai M, et al. Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of curriculum-based training for intracorporeal suturing and knot tying. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(4):560-568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wilson T, Sahu A, Johnson DS, Turner PG. The effect of trainee involvement on procedure and list times: a statistical analysis with discussion of current issues affecting orthopaedic training in UK. Surgeon. 2010;8(1):15-19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony G. Gallagher
    • 1
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
    • 2
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
    • 3
  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  2. 2.Mercy University HospitalCorkIreland
  3. 3.Cork Cancer Research CentreUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations