Advertisement

Human Factors in Acquiring Medical Skill; Perception and Cognition

  • Anthony G. Gallagher
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
Chapter
Part of the Improving Medical Outcome - Zero Tolerance book series (IMOZT)

Abstract

To a large extent, the increase in usage of laparoscopic surgery as an operative technique during the 1980s concealed many of its problems. However, had it not been for the development of laparoscopic surgery, medicine and surgery may never have taken account of ‘human factors’ as they relate to the practice of procedural medicine. As seen over the next two chapters, human factors are at the core of procedural medicine, particularly in relation to the problems associated with the learning and practice of modern image guided techniques.

Keywords

Human Factor Work Memory Capacity Slave System Sensory Memory Phonological Loop 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;4(11):417-423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baddeley AD, Hitch G. Working memory. In: Bower GH, ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 8. New York: Academic Press; 1974:47-90.Google Scholar
  3. Blakemore C, Mitchell DE. Environmental modification of the visual cortex and the neural basis of learning and memory. Nature. 1973. doi: 10.1038/241467a0. 467–468.
  4. Boivin MJ, Giordani B, Berent S, et al. Verbal fluency and positron emission tomographic mapping of regional cerebral glucose metabolism. Cortex. 1992;28(2):231-239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson NR. Physiology of Behavior. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon; 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Charlot V, Tzourio N, Zilbovicius M, Mazoyer B, Denis M. Different mental imagery abilities result in different regional cerebral blood flow activation patterns during cognitive tasks. Neuropsychologia. 1992;30(6):565-569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conway ARA, Kane MJ, Bunting MF, Hambrick D, Wilhelm O, Engle RW. Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and user’s guide. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005;12(5):769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crosthwaite G, Chung T, Dunkley P, Shimi S, Cuschieri A. Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 1995:82(6);849-851. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuschieri A. Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations. Am J Surg. 1995;169(1):9-19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engle RW, Kane MJ, Tuholski SW. Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In: Miyake A, Shah P, eds. Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:102-134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans L. Traffic Safety and the Driver. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company; 1991.Google Scholar
  12. Fukuda K, Vogel EK. Human variation in overriding attentional capture. J Neurosci. 2009;29(27):8726.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuster JM. Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed-response performance: neuronal correlates of transient memory. J Neurophysiol. 1973;36(1):61-78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallagher AG, Smith CD. From the operating room of the present to the operating room of the future. Human-factors lessons learned from the minimally invasive surgery revolution. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2003;10(3):127-139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy. 1998;30(7):617-620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Lederman AB, McClusky DA 3rd, Smith CD. Video-assisted surgery represents more than a loss of three-dimensional vision. Am J Surg. 2005b;189(1):76-80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallagher AG, Al-Akash M, Seymour NE, Satava RM. An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance. Surg Endosc. 2009a;23(12):2684-2691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray P. Psychology. 4th ed. New York: Worth Publishers; 2002.Google Scholar
  19. Gusnard DA, Raichle ME. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2(10):685-694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Influence of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging on endoscopic bowel suturing. World J Surg. 2000;24(4):444-449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A. Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet. 1998b;351(9098):248-251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hell W. Research on monocular depth perception between 1884 and 1914: Influence of the German Unfallversicherungsgesetz and of the jurisdiction of the Reichsversicherungsamt. Perception. 1981;10(6):683-694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Honey G, Fu C, Kim J, et al. Effects of verbal working memory load on corticocortical connectivity modeled by path analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Neuroimage. 2002;17(2):573-582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meister D. The History of Human Factors and Ergonomics. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999.Google Scholar
  25. Miaczynska M, Pelkmans L, Zerial M. Not just a sink: endosomes in control of signal transduction. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004;16(4):400-406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956;63(2):81-97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montagna W. The Structure and Function of Skin. New York: Academic Press; 1962.Google Scholar
  28. Moravec H. When will computer hardware match the human brain. J Evol Technol. 1998;1(1).Google Scholar
  29. Parks RW, Loewenstein DA, Dodrill KL, et al. Cerebral metabolic effects of a verbal fluency test: a PET scan study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988;10(5):565-575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reichle ED, Carpenter PA, Just MA. The neural bases of strategy and skill in sentence-picture verification* 1. Cogn Psychol. 2000;40(4):261-295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reinhardt-Rutland AH. Remote operation: a selective review of research into visual depth perception. J Gen Psychol. 1996;123(3):237-248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Siegel G, Agranoff B, Albers R, Fisher S, Uhler M, eds. Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1999.Google Scholar
  33. Smith EE, Jonides J. Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science. 1999;283(5408):1657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steinman SB, Steinman BA, Garzia RP. Foundations of Binocular Vision: A Clinical Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2000.Google Scholar
  35. Tarnow E. Short term memory may be the depletion of the readily releasable pool of presynaptic neurotransmitter vesicles of a metastable long term memory trace pattern. Cogn Neurodyn. 2009;3(3):263-269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony G. Gallagher
    • 1
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
    • 2
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
    • 3
  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  2. 2.Mercy University HospitalCorkIreland
  3. 3.Cork Cancer Research CentreUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations