Advertisement

Simulations for Procedural Training

  • Anthony G. Gallagher
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
Chapter
Part of the Improving Medical Outcome - Zero Tolerance book series (IMOZT)

Abstract

While the art of simulation has been known for many centuries the science of simulation has only come to the fore in the late twentieth and early twenty-first century. Simulation is the imitation of some real thing, state of affairs, or process. The act of simulating something generally entails representing certain key characteristics or behaviors of a selected physical or abstract system.

Keywords

Virtual Reality Skill Laboratory Carotid Artery Stenting Surgical Training Procedural Skill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, et al. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg. 2007;193(6):797-804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, Cowie RJ, Ayeni SA, Dunn BK. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2002;269(1):20-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beddy P, Ridgway PF, Beddy D, Clarke E, Traynor O, Tierney S. Defining useful surrogates for user participation in online medical learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14(4):567-574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond WF, Deitrick LM, Arnold DC, et al. Using simulation to instruct emergency medicine residents in cognitive forcing strategies. Acad Med. 2004;79(5):438-446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll SM, Kennedy AM, Traynor O, Gallagher AG. Objective assessment of surgical performance and its impact on a national selection programme of candidates for higher surgical training in plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62(12):1543-1549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cates CU, Patel AD, Nicholson WJ. Use of virtual reality simulation for mission rehearsal for carotid stenting. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;297(3):265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coulehan JL, Williams PC, Landis D, Naser C. The first patient: reflections and stories about the anatomy cadaver. Teach Learn Med. 1995;7(1):61-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson S, Cotin S, Meglan D, Shaffer DW, Ferrell MA. Designing a computer-based simulator for interventional cardiology training. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;51(4):522-527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edmond CV Jr, Heskamp D, Sluis D, et al. ENT endoscopic surgical training simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;39:518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis H. Teaching in the dissecting room. Clin Anat. 2001;14(2):149-151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2004;240(3):518-525; discussion 525-518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fried MP, Sadoughi B, Weghorst SJ, et al. Construct validity of the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator: II. Assessment of discriminant validity and expert benchmarking. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(4):350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fried M, Sadoughi B, Gibber M, et al. From virtual reality to the operating room: the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator experiment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142(2):202-207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaba DM, DeAnda A. A comprehensive anesthesia simulation environment: re-creating the operating room for research and training. Anesthesiology. 1988;69(3):387-394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallagher AG, Cates CU. Approval of virtual reality training for carotid stenting: what this means for procedural-based medicine. J Am Med Assoc. 2004a;292(24):3024-3026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallagher AG, Cates CU. Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Lancet. 2004b;364(9444):1538-1540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallagher AG, Smith CD. From the operating room of the present to the operating room of the future. Human-factors lessons learned from the minimally invasive surgery revolution. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2003;10(3):127-139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, et al. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg. 2005;241(2):364-372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallagher AG, Neary P, Gillen P, et al. Novel method for assessment and selection of trainees for higher surgical training in general surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(4):282-290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004;91(2):146-150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gregory RL. Mind in science. A history of explanations in psychology and physics. Group Anal. 1983;16(1):88.Google Scholar
  22. Haluck, R. What’s Available in the Medical Simulation Field. Penn State Hershey Simulation Center, Penn State College of Medicine at the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center http://pennstatehershey.org/web/simulation/home/available. (accessed 23rd July 2011)Google Scholar
  23. Kennedy AM, Carroll S, Traynor O, Gallagher AG. Assessing surgical skill using bench station models. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):1869-1870.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lanier J, Biocca, F. An Insider’s View of the Future of Virtual Reality. Journal of Communication 1992;42(4):150-172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Monkman GJ. An electrorheological tactile display. Presence: Teleoper Virtual Environ. 1992;1(2):228.Google Scholar
  26. Mutyala S, Cahill DR. Catching up. Clin Anat. 1996;9(1):53-56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicholson WJ, Cates CU, Patel AD, et al. Face and content validation of virtual reality simulation for carotid angiography: results from the first 100 physicians attending the Emory NeuroAnatomy Carotid Training (ENACT) program. Simul Healthc. 2006;1(3):147-150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nuland SB. Doctors; The Biography of Medicine. New York: Vintage Books; 1988.Google Scholar
  29. Patel AD, Gallagher AG, Nicholson WJ, Cates CU. Learning curves and reliability measures for virtual reality simulation in the performance assessment of carotid angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(9):1796-1802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pearson AM, Gallagher AG, Rosser JC, Satava RM. Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(1):130-137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, et al. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. 2004;135(1):21-27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosen KR. The history of medical simulation. Journal of Critical Care 2008:23(2);157-166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Policies and Procedures; Anatomical specimens used for skills training http://www.surgeons.org/media/16948/REL_SKC_6602_P_Anatomical_Specimens_Skills_Centre_Policy.pdf. (accessed 5th July 2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Satava RM. Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps. Surg Endosc. 1993;7(3):203-205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Senate of Surgery. Response to the General Medical Council Determination on the Bristol Case: Senate Paper 5. London: The Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland; 1998.Google Scholar
  36. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):458-463; discussion 463-454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Fundamentals of Lap­aroscopic Surgery (FLS). http://www.flsprogram.org/(accessed 5th July 2011)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2010;199(1):115-120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Uribe JI, Ralph WM Jr, Glaser AY, Fried MP. Learning curves, acquisition, and retention of skills trained with the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator. Am J Rhinol. 2004;18(2):87-92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Choong A, Brightwell R, Vermassen FE, Cheshire NJ. Virtual reality simulation objectively differentiates level of carotid stent experience in experienced interventionalists. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(5):855-863.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Sickle K, Iii D, Gallagher AG, Smith CD. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc. 2005a;19(9):1227-1231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Sickle K, Smith B, McClusky DA 3rd, Baghai M, Smith CD, Gallagher AG. Evaluation of a tensiometer to provide objective feedback in knot-tying performance. Am Surg. 2005b;71(12):1018-1023.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Sickle K, Ritter EM, Baghai M, et al. Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of curriculum-based training for intracorporeal suturing and knot tying. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(4):560-568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson MS, Middlebrook A, Sutton C, Stone R, McCloy RF. MIST VR: a virtual reality trainer for laparoscopic surgery assesses performance. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79(6):403-404.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony G. Gallagher
    • 1
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
    • 2
  • Gerald C. O’Sullivan
    • 3
  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  2. 2.Mercy University HospitalCorkIreland
  3. 3.Cork Cancer Research CentreUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations