Determination of the Diffusion Coefficient of LiFePO4



The galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) and the impedance spectroscopy (IS) have been extensively used to calculate the lithium chemical diffusion coefficient in intercalation materials. The classical application of these techniques is related to systems in which the concentration of the intercalant changes monotonically as intercalation proceeds. Such a situation is valid only for topotactic solid-state intercalation reactions that lead to the formation of solid-solution phases. When the intercalation/de-intercalation of lithium is accompanied by strong electron–ion interactions, the intercalation proceeds following one or several reaction fronts, and leads to the co- existence of two phases (Andersson et al., Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 3, 66–68, 2000; Conway Electrochim. Acta. 38, 1249–1258, 1993). The co-existence of two phases makes the meaning of the chemical diffusion coefficient as a function of the composition unclear. In such a case, the chemical diffusion coefficient as obtained from GITT and IS measurements, may be taken as an effective measure which reflects the intensity of long- and short-range interactions between the intercalated species. The intercalation of lithium into electrode materials can be described and treated similarly to an adsorption process at the metal/solution interface (Vorotyntsev and Badiali, Electrochim. Acta. 39, 289–306, 1994) or to the charging of electronically conductive polymers (McKinnon and Haering, Modern Aspect in Electrochemistry, Plenum Press, New York, 1987). In the case of strong interactions between the intercalated species, a Frumkin-type sorption isotherm was used to describe the intercalation process and derive fundamental thermodynamic properties (Vorotyntsev and Badiali, Electrochim. Acta. 39, 289–306, 1994; Levi et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 1279–1289, 1999; Sato et al., J Power Sour 68, 674–679, 1997; Nishizawa et al., Electrochem. Solid State 1, 10–12, 1998; Barker et al., J. Power Sour 52, 185–192, 1994). In this chapter the chemical diffusion coefficient of lithium in 10 wt% carbon added LiFePO4 was calculated by using GITT and IS. The lithium insertion in LiFePO4 was treated as an insertion process with a Frumkin-type sorption isotherm (Prosini et al., Solid State Ionics 148, 45–51, 2002). A minimum in the lithium chemical diffusion coefficient (DLi) was predicted by the model for strong attractive interactions between the intercalation species and the host matrix. The DLi was measured as a function of the lithium content by using the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT). The diffusion coefficient was found to be 1.8 × 10?14 and 2.2 × 10?16 cm2 s?1 for LiFePO4 and FePO4, respectively with a minimum in correspondence of the peak of the differential capacity. The DLi has also been measured by impedance spectroscopy for various lithium contents. The calculated values are in very good agreement with the previously calculated ones.


Differential Capacity Composite Cathode Impedance Spectroscopy Lithium Content Lithium Intercalation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    A.S. Andersson, J.O. Thomas, B. Kalska et al., Thermal stability of LiFePO4-based cathodes. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 3, 66–68 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.E. Conway, Two-dimensional and quasi-two-dimensional isotherms for Li intercalation and upd processes at surfaces. Electrochim. Acta. 38, 1249–1258 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.A. Vorotyntsev, J.P. Badiali, Short-range electron–ion interaction effects in charging the electroactive polymer films. Electrochim. Acta. 39, 289–306 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W.R. McKinnon, R.R. Haering, Modern Aspect in Electrochemistry, vol. 15 (Plenum Press, New York, 1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.D. Levi, G. Salitra, B. Markovsky et al., Solid-state electrochemical kinetics of Li-ion intercalation into Li1?xCoO2: Simultaneous application of electroanalytical techniques SSCV, PITT, and EIS. J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 1279–1289 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Sato, T. Asada, H. Tokugawa et al., Observation of structure change due to discharge/charge process of V2O5 prepared by ozone oxidation method, using in situ X-ray diffraction technique. J Power Sour. 68, 674–679 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Nishizawa, R. Hashitani, T. Itoh et al., Measurements of chemical diffusion coefficient of lithium ion in graphitized mesocarbon microbeads using a microelectrode. Electrochem. Solid State 1, 10–12 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Barker, R. Pynenburg, R. Koksbang, Determination of thermodynamic, kinetic and interfacial properties for the Li//LixMn2O4 system by electrochemical techniques. J. Power Sour. 52, 185–192 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.P. Prosini, M. Lisi, D. Zane et al., Determination of the chemical diffusion coefficient of lithium in LiFePO4. Solid State Ionics 148, 45–51 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.V. Churikov, A.V. Ivanishchev, I.A. Ivanishcheva et al., Determination of lithium diffusion coefficient in LiFePO4 electrode by galvanostatic and potentiostatic intermittent titration techniques. Electrochim. Acta. 55, 2939–2950 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.-I. Pyun, J.-S. Bae, The ac impedance study of electrochemical lithium intercalation into porous vanadium oxide electrode. Electrochim. Acta. 41, 919–925 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Weppner, R.A. Huggins, Determination of the kinetic parameters of mixed-conducting electrodes and application to the system Li3Sb. J. Electrochem. Soc. 124, 1569–1578 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Li, G. Pistoia, Secondary Li cells. II. Characteristics of lithiated manganese oxides synthesized from LiNO3 and MnO2. Solid State Ionics 47, 241–249 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Coustier, S. Passerini, W.H. Smyrl, Dip-coated silver-doped V2O5 xerogels as host materials for lithium intercalation. Solid State Ionics 100, 247–258 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.D. Levi, K. Gamolsky, D. Aurbach et al., Determination of the Li ion chemical diffusion coefficient for the topotactic solid-state reactions occurring via a two-phase or single-phase solid solution pathway. J. Electroanal. Chem. 477, 32–40 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Ho, I.D. Raistrick, R.A. Huggins, Application of A-C techniques to the study of lithium diffusion in tungsten trioxide thin films. J. Electrochem. Soc. 127, 343–350 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Renewable Technical Unit, C.R. CasacciaENEARomeItaly

Personalised recommendations