Transformation of Urban Knowledge Sources to Ontologies

  • Javier Nogueras-Iso
  • Javier Lacasta
  • Jacques Teller
  • Gilles Falquet
  • Jacques Guyot
Part of the Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing book series (AI&KP, volume 1)


Since the development of ontologies from scratch requires much time and many resources, the activity of knowledge acquisition constitutes one of the most important steps at the beginning of the ontology development process. This activity is essential in all the different methodologies for ontology design as a previous step to the conceptualization and formalization phases.


Ontology Engineering Ontology Learning Text Mining Technique Ontology Construction Knowledge Organization System 


  1. Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: Ontology engineering. In: A Semantic Web Primer, pp. 205–222. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2004)Google Scholar
  2. Astrova, I.: Reverse engineering of relational databases to ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 1st European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS), LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 327–341 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. Astrova, I., Stantic, B.: An html-form-driven approach to reverse engineering of relational databases to ontologies. In: Databases and Applications, pp. 246–251 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. Borgo, S.: How formal ontology can help civil engineers. In: Ontologies for Urban Development. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 61, pp. 37–45. Springer, Berlin / Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  5. Cimiano, P.: Ontology learning and population from text. Algorithms, Evaluation and Applications. Springer Science  +  Business Media, LLC, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  6. Clark, P., Thompson, J., Holmback, H., Duncan, L.: Exploiting a thesaurus-based semantic net for knowledge-based search. In Proceeding 12th Conference on Innovative Application of AI (AAAI/IAAI’00), pp. 988–995 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. Fisher, D.H.: From thesauri towards ontologies? In: el Hadi, W.M., Maniez, J., Pollitt, S.A. (eds.) Structures and Relations in Knowledge Organization: Proceeding 5th International ISKO Conference, pp. 18–30, Lille, France (1998)Google Scholar
  8. Gandon, F.: Distributed Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and multi-agent systems for a corporate semantic web. Scientific Philosopher Doctorate Thesis In Informatics, INRIA and University of Nice – Sophia Antipolis, Doctoral School of Sciences and Technologies of Information and Communication (S.T.I.C.) (2002)Google Scholar
  9. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering, chapter Methodologies and Methods for Building Ontologies. Springer, London (2003a)Google Scholar
  10. Gómez-Pérez, A., Manzano-Macho, D.: A survey of ontology learning methods and techniques. Deliberable 1.5, OntoWeb Consortium (2003b).Google Scholar
  11. Golbeck, J., Fragoso, G., Hartel, F., Hendler, J., Parsia, B., Oberthaler, J.: The National Cancer Institute’s thesaurus and ontology. J. Web. Sem. 1(1), 1–5 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hepp, M., de Bruijn, J.: GenTax: A generic methodology for deriving owl and rdf-s ontologies from hierarchical classifications, thesauri, and inconsistent taxonomies. In: LNCS, Proceedings of the 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2007), vol. 4519, pp. 129–144, Innsbruck, Austria. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York (2007)Google Scholar
  13. Jannink, J.: Thesaurus entry extraction from an on-line dictionary. In: Proceedings of Fusion ’99 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. Kashyap, V.: Design and creation of ontologies for environmental information retrieval. In: 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition Modeling and Management (KAW’99), Banff, Canada (1999)Google Scholar
  15. Kawtrakul, A., Imsombut, A., Thunkijjanukit, A., Soergel, D., Liang, A., Sini, M., Johannsen, G., Keizer, J.: Automatic term relationship cleaning and refinement for AGROVOC. In: Workshop on The Sixth Agricultural Ontology Service, Vila Real, Portugal (2005)Google Scholar
  16. Kietz, J.U., Maedche, A., Volz, R.: A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate intranet. In: Proceedings of Workshop Ontologies and Text, EKAW’2000, (2000)Google Scholar
  17. Lacasta, J., Nogueras-Iso, J., Zarazaga-Soria, F.J.: Terminological Ontologies: Design, Management and Practical Applications, 197 p. Springer, New York/Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London (2010). ISBN: 978-1-4419-6980-4Google Scholar
  18. Miles, A., Matthews, B., Wilson, M.: SKOS core: simple knowledge organization for the WEB. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, pp. 5–13, Madrid, Spain (2005)Google Scholar
  19. Nogueras-Iso, J., López-Pellicer, F.J., Lacasta, J., Zarazaga-Soria, F.J., Muro-Medrano, P.R.: Building an address gazetteer on top of an urban network ontology. In: Teller, J., Roussey, C., Lee, J. (eds.) Ontologies for Urban Development: Interfacing Urban Information Systems. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 61, pp. 157–167. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  20. Rigau, G., Rodríguez, H., Agirre, E. Building accurate semantic taxonomies from monolingual mrds. In: Proceeding 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics COLING-ACL’98, Montreal, Canada (1998)Google Scholar
  21. Soergel, D., Lauser, B., Liang, A., Fisseha, F., Keizer, J., Katz, S.: Reengineering thesauri for new applications: The AGROVOC example. J. Dig. Inf. 4(4), 1–19 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. van Assem, M., Malaisé, V., Miles, A., Schreiber, G.: A method to convert thesauri to SKOS. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-06), Budva, Montenegro, LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 95–109. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York (2006)Google Scholar
  23. van Assem, M., Menken, M.R., Schreiber, G., Wielemaker, J., Wielinga, B.: A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL. In: McIlraith S.A., Plexousakis D., van Harmelen F. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), Hiroshima, Japan, LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 17–31. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York (2004)Google Scholar
  24. van Heist, G., Schreiber, A.T., Wielinga, B.J.: Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46(2/3), 183–292 (1997)Google Scholar
  25. Velardi, P., Fabriani, P., Missikoff, M.: Using text processing techniques to automatically enrich a domain ontology. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, FOIS 2001, pp. 270–284 (2001)Google Scholar
  26. Volz, R., Oberle, D., Staab, S., Studer, R.: OntoLiFT prototype. Wonder Web Delivarable Dll, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe (2003)Google Scholar
  27. Wielinga, B.J., Schreiber, A.T., Wielemaker, J., Sandberg, J.A.C.: From thesaurus to ontology. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 194–201, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier Nogueras-Iso
    • 1
  • Javier Lacasta
    • 1
  • Jacques Teller
    • 2
  • Gilles Falquet
    • 3
  • Jacques Guyot
    • 3
  1. 1.Computer Science and Systems Engineering DepartmentUniversity of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain
  2. 2.LEMA, Université de LiègeLiègeBelgium
  3. 3.Centre universitaire d’informatique, Université de GenèveCarougeSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations