Mission and Outcomes



All of the accreditation standards in use across the globe articulate the need for the medical education program to define its mission. The statement of the mission is an important way to express the educational philosophy and focus and a means to help the program differentiate itself from other medical education programs. For instance, the mission of a medical school should encapsulate what it is that the medical program wants to achieve now but also define the school’s aspirations for the future. Making the medical program mission as succinct as possible such that it is capable of being shared and understood by faculty and students is an important consideration. Most accreditation teams will seek to ensure that the mission is carefully understood by individual members of staff. Mission statements for medical education programs typically describe excellence in teaching (such as innovation) and/or research (such as articulating key research themes or areas). Some medical schools point to course delivery methods such as problem-based or case-based learning and others to the specific context in which student learning will take place (such as rural and remote settings):


Medical Program Degree Qualification Medical Education Program Quality Assurance Process Quality Improvement Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland R. Noble purpose. Dublin: Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland; 2012. Available from: http://www.rcsi.ie/. Cited 20 Feb 2012.
  2. 2.
    Sydney Medical School. The University of Sydney. 2012. Available from: http://sydney.edu.au/medicine/. Cited 20 Feb 2012.
  3. 3.
    Australian Medical Council Limited. Standards for assessment and accreditation of medical schools by the Australian Medical Council 2010. Australian Medical Council Limited; 2010.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harden RM. Outcome-based education: the future is today. Med Teach. 2007;29(7):625–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harden RM. Outcome-based education – the ostrich, the peacock and the beaver. Med Teach. 2007;29(7):666–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning at university. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harden RM. Learning outcomes as a tool to assess progression. Med Teach. 2007;29(7):678–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kassebaum DG, Eaglen RH, Cutler ER. The objectives of medical education: reflections in the accreditation looking glass. Acad Med. 1997;72(7):648–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frank JR, Danoff D. The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach. 2007;29(7):642–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    General Medical Council G. Tomorrows doctors. 2008. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/undergraduate_policy/tomorrows_doctors.asp#Introduction. Cited Dec 2008.
  11. 11.
    Cumming A, Ross M. The Tuning Project for Medicine – learning outcomes for undergraduate medical education in Europe. Med Teach. 2007;29(7):636–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bloom B, Englehart M, Furst E, Hill W, Krathwohl D. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. New York/Toronto: Longmans, Green; 1956.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kennedy D. Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide. Ireland: University College Cork; 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Medicine and DentistryJames Cook University Cairns Clinical SchoolCairnsAustralia

Personalised recommendations