Skip to main content

Getting Underway

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality Assurance in Medical Education
  • 1197 Accesses

Abstract

Most medical education institutions across the globe come under regular review and accreditation by national and/or regional bodies. Well-known examples include the Australian Medical Council (AMC) in Australia, the General Medical Council (GMC) in the UK, and the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) in the USA. Preparing a medical institution for institutional review or accreditation can be challenging, requiring an understanding of the international standards being used, adequate resources, preparation, and planning. This book provides a practical guide for medical educators preparing their medical education program for independent review. Use of internationally accepted standards and how these standards “drive” the quality improvement agenda in medical education are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cuban L. Change without reform: the case of Stanford University School of Medicine, 1908–1990. Am Educ Res J. 1997;34(1):83–122.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association of American Medical Colleges. Physicians for the twenty-first century. The GPEP report: report of the Panel on the General Professional Education of the Physician and College Preparation for Medicine. Washington D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen J, Dannefer EF, Seidel HM, Weisman CS, Wexler P, Brown TM, et al. Medical education change: a detailed study of six medical schools. Med Educ. 1994;28(5):350–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis MH, Karunathilake I, Harden RM. AMEE Education Guide no. 28: the development and role of departments of medical education. Med Teach. 2005;27(8):665–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. World Federation for Medical Education W. Basic medical education WFME global standards for quality improvement. In: WFME, editor. Copenhagen, Denmark: WFME Office, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grant J, Marshall J, Gary N. Final report: quality improvement in basic medical education evaluation of the implementation in pilot sites of the World Federation for Medical Education’s International Standards; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. General Medical Council G. Tomorrow’s doctors – outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. General Medical Council. 2009. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/tomorrows_doctors.asp. Cited 20 Feb 2012.

  8. General Medical Council G. The trainee doctor – foundation and specialty, including GP training. General Medical Council, GMC. 2011. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/postgraduate/standards_and_guidance.asp. Cited 20 Feb 2012.

  9. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the M.D. degree Liaison Committee on Medical Education. 2011. Available from: http://www.lcme.org/standard.htm. Cited 20 Feb 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geraldine MacCarrick .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacCarrick, G. (2013). Getting Underway. In: Quality Assurance in Medical Education. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-713-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics