Malignant Mesothelioma

  • Claire W. Michael


While malignant mesothelioma is a relatively rare neoplasm, it provokes a lot of anxiety due to its poor prognosis, the litigation that follows such a diagnosis, and the difficulty in establishing the diagnosis itself. Mesothelioma presents with large serosal effusion in over 90% of patients,1 a fact that situates cytology as the primary mode of evaluation and diagnosis. Yet, there is a general perception that a definitive diagnosis cannot be rendered by cytology and hence the need for tissue biopsy despite ample literature to the contrary.2 This concern is probably due to the fact that most general pathologists do not have adequate experience with mesothelioma due to its rarity and the salient features of the exfoliated malignant cells that can be misinterpreted as reactive mesothelium or adenocarcinoma. However, with the availability of new immunocytochemical stains, the last decade has witnessed a plethora of literature confirming that mesothelioma can be distinguished from carcinoma with a high degree of accuracy.3,4


Hyaluronic Acid Mesothelial Cell Malignant Mesothelioma Cytological Feature Peritoneal Mesothelioma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Ismail-Khan R, Robinson LA, Williams CC Jr, Garrett CR, Bepler G, Simon GR. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: a comprehensive review. Cancer Control. 2006;13:255-263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Husain AN, Colby TV, Ordonez NG, et al. Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: a consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:1317-1331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fetsch PA, Abati A. Immunocytochemistry in effusion cytology: a contemporary review. Cancer. 2001;93:293-308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Westfall DE, Fan X, Marchevsky AM. Evidence-based guidelines to optimize the selection of antibody panels in cytopathology: pleural effusions with malignant epithelioid cells. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38:9-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bedrossian CW. Asbestos-related diseases: a historical and mineralogic perspective. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1992;9:91-96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roggli VL, McGavran MH, Subach J, Sybers HD, Greenberg SD. Pulmonary asbestos body counts and electron probe analysis of asbestos body cores in patients with mesothelioma: a study of 25 cases. Cancer. 1982;50:2423-2432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mark EJ, Kradin RL. Pathological recognition of diffuse malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: the significance of the historical perspective as regards this signal tumor. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23:25-34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dogan AU, Dogan M, Hoskins JA. Erionite series minerals: mineralogical and carcinogenic properties. Environ Geochem Health. 2008;30:367-381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boylan AM. Mesothelioma: new concepts in diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2000;6:157-163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corson JM. Pathology of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;9:347-355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chirieac LR, Corson JM. Pathologic evaluation of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;21:121-124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alexander HR Jr. Surgical treatment of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: past, present, and future. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:21-22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kerrigan SA, Turnnir RT, Clement PB, Young RH, Churg A. Diffuse malignant epithelial mesotheliomas of the peritoneum in women: a clinicopathologic study of 25 patients. Cancer. 2002;94:378-385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hassan R, Remaley AT, Sampson ML, et al. Detection and quantitation of serum mesothelin, a tumor marker for patients with mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:447-453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Antman KH, Osteen RT, Klegar KL, et al. Early peritoneal mesothelioma: a treatable malignancy. Lancet. 1985;2:977-981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baratti D, Kusamura S, Cabras AD, Laterza B, Balestra MR, Deraco M. Lymph node metastases in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:45-53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Henderson DW. Malignant Mesothelioma. In: Jahannessen JV, ed. The Cancer Series. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1992:69-139.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsuo T, Ito H, Anami M, Ikeda T, Nishihata S. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma with squamous metaplasia. Cytopathology. 1993;4:373-378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mayall FG, Gibbs AR. The histology and immunohistochemistry of small cell mesothelioma. Histopathology. 1992;20:47-51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ordonez NG. Mesothelioma with clear cell features: an ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study of 20 cases. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:465-473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chang HT, Yantiss RK, Nielsen GP, McKee GT, Mark EJ. Lipid-rich diffuse malignant mesothelioma: a case report. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:876-879.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klebe S, Mahar A, Henderson DW, Roggli VL. Malignant mesothelioma with heterologous elements: clinicopathological correlation of 27 cases and literature review. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:1084-1094.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wilson GE, Hasleton PS, Chatterjee AK. Desmoplastic malignant mesothelioma: a review of 17 cases. J Clin Pathol. 1992;45:295-298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ishikawa R, Kikuchi E, Jin M, et al. Desmoplastic malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: autopsy reveals asbestos exposure. Pathol Int. 2003;53:401-406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yao DX, Shia J, Erlandson RA, Klimstra DS. Lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma: a clinical, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of four cases and literature review. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2004;28:213-228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Henderson DW, Attwood HD, Constance TJ, Shilkin KB, Steele RH. Lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma: a rare lymphomatoid variant of predominantly sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1988;12:367-384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shia J, Erlandson RA, Klimstra DS. Deciduoid mesothelioma: a report of 5 cases and literature review. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2002;26:355-363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shanks JH, Harris M, Banerjee SS, et al. Mesotheliomas with deciduoid morphology: a morphologic spectrum and a variant not confined to young females. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:285-294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ordonez NG. Epithelial mesothelioma with deciduoid features: report of four cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:816-823.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Azzopardi JG. Oat-cell carcinoma of the bronchus. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1959;78:513-519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Talerman A, Montero JR, Chilcote RR, Okagaki T. Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma in a 13-year-old girl. Report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9:73-80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Renshaw AA, Dean BR, Antman KH, Sugarbaker DJ, Cibas ES. The role of cytologic evaluation of pleural fluid in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Chest. 1997;111:106-109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen GK. Cytopathology of pleural mesotheliomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114(Suppl):S68-S81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rakha EA, Patil S, Abdulla K, Abdulkader M, Chaudry Z, Soomro IN. The sensitivity of cytologic evaluation of pleural fluid in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38:874-879.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tao LC. The cytopathology of mesothelioma. Acta Cytol. 1979;23:209-213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Papanicolaou GN, ed. Atlas of Exfoliative Cytology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1956.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Naylor B. The exfoliative cytology of diffuse malignant mesothelioma. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1963;86:293-298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Roberts GH, Campbell GM. Exfoliative cytology of diffuse mesothelioma. J Clin Pathol. 1972;25:577-582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Whitaker D, Shilkin KB. The cytology of malignant mesothelioma in Western Australia. Acta Cytol. 1978;22:67-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ehya H. The cytologic diagnosis of mesothelioma. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1986;3:196-203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bedrossian CW, Bonsib S, Moran C. Differential diagnosis between mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma: a multimodal approach based on ultrastructure and immunocytochemistry. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1992;9:124-140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kho-Duffin J, Tao LC, Cramer H, Catellier MJ, Irons D, Ng P. Cytologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, with particular emphasis on the epithelial noncohesive cell type. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;20:57-62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Patel NP, Taylor CA, Levine EA, Trupiano JK, Geisinger KR. Cytomorphologic features of primary peritoneal mesothelioma in effusion, washing, and fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens: examination of 49 cases at one institution, including post-intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy findings. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;128:414-422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Whitaker D. Cell aggregates in malignant mesothelioma. Acta Cytol. 1977;21:236-239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gillespie FR, van der Walt JD, Derias N, Kenney A. Deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma. A report of the cytological appearances. Cytopathology. 2001;12:57-61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ikeda K, Suzuki T, Tate G, Mitsuya T. Cytomorphologic features of well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma in peritoneal effusion: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:512-515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hejmadi R, Ganesan R, Kamal NG. Malignant transformation of a well-differentiated peritoneal papillary mesothelioma. Acta Cytol. 2003;47:517-518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cook DS, Attanoos RL, Jalloh SS, Gibbs AR. ‘Mucin-positive’ epithelial mesothelioma of the peritoneum: an unusual diagnostic pitfall. Histopathology. 2000;37:33-36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Triol JH, Conston AS, Chandler SV. Malignant mesothelioma. Cytopathology of 75 cases seen in a New Jersey community hospital. Acta Cytol. 1984;28:37-45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Whitaker D, Shilkin KB. Diagnosis of pleural malignant mesothelioma in life–a practical approach. J Pathol. 1984;143:147-175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Welker L, Muller M, Holz O, Vollmer E, Magnussen H, Jorres RA. Cytological diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma–improvement by additional analysis of hyaluronic acid in pleural effusions. Virchows Arch. 2007;450:455-461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ordonez NG. What are the current best immunohistochemical markers for the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma? A review and update. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1-16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Beasley MB. Immunohistochemistry of pulmonary and pleural neoplasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:1062-1072.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ordonez NG. The diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in distinguishing between peritoneal mesotheliomas and serous carcinomas: a comparative study. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:34-48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Portugal R, Oliva E. Calretinin: diagnostic utility in the female genital tract. Adv Anat Pathol. 2009;16:118-124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hanna A, Pang Y, Bedrossian CW, Dejmek A, Michael CW. Podoplanin is a useful marker for identifying mesothelioma in malignant effusions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38:264-269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Saad RS, Lindner JL, Lin X, Liu YL, Silverman JF. The diagnostic utility of D2–40 for malignant mesothelioma versus pulmonary carcinoma with pleural involvement. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34:801-806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bassarova AV, Nesland JM, Davidson B. D2–40 is not a specific marker for cells of mesothelial origin in serous effusions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:878-882.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ascoli V, Scalzo CC, Taccogna S, Nardi F. The diagnostic value of thrombomodulin immunolocalization in serous effusions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995;119:1136-1140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Pu RT, Pang Y, Michael CW. Utility of WT-1, p63, MOC31, mesothelin, and cytokeratin (K903 and CK5/6) immunostains in differentiating adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant mesothelioma in effusions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:20-25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Fetsch PA, Simsir A, Abati A. Comparison of antibodies to HBME-1 and calretinin for the detection of mesothelial cells in effusion cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;25:158-161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mimura T, Ito A, Sakuma T, et al. Novel marker D2–40, combined with calretinin, CEA, and TTF-1: an optimal set of immunodiagnostic markers for pleural mesothelioma. Cancer. 2007;109:933-938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lozano MD, Panizo A, Toledo GR, Sola JJ, Pardo-Mindan J. Immunocytochemistry in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions: a comparative evaluation of eight monoclonal antibodies in Papanicolaou stained smears. Cancer. 2001;93:68-72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wiseman W, Michael CW, Roh MH. Diagnostic utility of PAX8 and PAX2 immunohistochemistry in the identification of metastatic Mullerian carcinoma in effusions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010 October 14 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sack MJ, Roberts SA. Cytokeratins 20 and 7 in the differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma in cytologic specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997;16:132-136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ordonez NG. The diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between epithelioid mesotheliomas and squamous carcinomas of the lung: a comparative study. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:417-428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hasteh F, Lin GY, Weidner N, Michael CW. The use of immunohistochemistry to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in cytologic effusions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118:90-96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Saad RS, Cho P, Liu YL, Silverman JF. The value of epithelial membrane antigen expression in separating benign mesothelial proliferation from malignant mesothelioma: a comparative study. Diagn Cytopathol. 2005;32:156-159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sivertsen S, Berner A, Michael CW, Bedrossian C, Davidson B. Cadherin expression in ovarian carcinoma and malignant mesothelioma cell effusions. Acta Cytol. 2006;50:603-607.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Simsir A, Fetsch P, Mehta D, Zakowski M, Abati A. E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and calretinin in pleural effusions: the good, the bad, the worthless. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;20:125-130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Mutsaers SE. The mesothelial cell. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:9-16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kimura N, Dota K, Araya Y, Ishidate T, Ishizaka M. Scoring system for differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma and reactive mesothelial cells on cytology specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 2009;37:885-890.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Cakir E, Demirag F, Aydin M, Unsal E. Cytopathologic differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells: a logistic regression analysis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2009;37:4-10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ordonez NG. Value of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing peritoneal mesothelioma from serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum: a review and update. Adv Anat Pathol. 2006;13:16-25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Davidson B, Risberg B, Kristensen G, et al. Detection of cancer cells in effusions from patients diagnosed with gynaecological malignancies. Evaluation of five epithelial markers. Virchows Arch. 1999;435:43-49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ordonez NG. Value of estrogen and progesterone receptor immunostaining in distinguishing between peritoneal mesotheliomas and serous carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:1163-1167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PathologyThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations