Skip to main content

Malignant Mesothelioma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Serous Effusions

Abstract

While malignant mesothelioma is a relatively rare neoplasm, it provokes a lot of anxiety due to its poor prognosis, the litigation that follows such a diagnosis, and the difficulty in establishing the diagnosis itself. Mesothelioma presents with large serosal effusion in over 90% of patients,1 a fact that situates cytology as the primary mode of evaluation and diagnosis. Yet, there is a general perception that a definitive diagnosis cannot be rendered by cytology and hence the need for tissue biopsy despite ample literature to the contrary.2 This concern is probably due to the fact that most general pathologists do not have adequate experience with mesothelioma due to its rarity and the salient features of the exfoliated malignant cells that can be misinterpreted as reactive mesothelium or adenocarcinoma. However, with the availability of new immunocytochemical stains, the last decade has witnessed a plethora of literature confirming that mesothelioma can be distinguished from carcinoma with a high degree of accuracy.3,4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ismail-Khan R, Robinson LA, Williams CC Jr, Garrett CR, Bepler G, Simon GR. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: a comprehensive review. Cancer Control. 2006;13:255-263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Husain AN, Colby TV, Ordonez NG, et al. Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: a consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:1317-1331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fetsch PA, Abati A. Immunocytochemistry in effusion cytology: a contemporary review. Cancer. 2001;93:293-308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Westfall DE, Fan X, Marchevsky AM. Evidence-based guidelines to optimize the selection of antibody panels in cytopathology: pleural effusions with malignant epithelioid cells. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38:9-14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bedrossian CW. Asbestos-related diseases: a historical and mineralogic perspective. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1992;9:91-96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roggli VL, McGavran MH, Subach J, Sybers HD, Greenberg SD. Pulmonary asbestos body counts and electron probe analysis of asbestos body cores in patients with mesothelioma: a study of 25 cases. Cancer. 1982;50:2423-2432.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mark EJ, Kradin RL. Pathological recognition of diffuse malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: the significance of the historical perspective as regards this signal tumor. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2006;23:25-34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dogan AU, Dogan M, Hoskins JA. Erionite series minerals: mineralogical and carcinogenic properties. Environ Geochem Health. 2008;30:367-381.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boylan AM. Mesothelioma: new concepts in diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2000;6:157-163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Corson JM. Pathology of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;9:347-355.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chirieac LR, Corson JM. Pathologic evaluation of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;21:121-124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander HR Jr. Surgical treatment of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: past, present, and future. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:21-22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kerrigan SA, Turnnir RT, Clement PB, Young RH, Churg A. Diffuse malignant epithelial mesotheliomas of the peritoneum in women: a clinicopathologic study of 25 patients. Cancer. 2002;94:378-385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan R, Remaley AT, Sampson ML, et al. Detection and quantitation of serum mesothelin, a tumor marker for patients with mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:447-453.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Antman KH, Osteen RT, Klegar KL, et al. Early peritoneal mesothelioma: a treatable malignancy. Lancet. 1985;2:977-981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baratti D, Kusamura S, Cabras AD, Laterza B, Balestra MR, Deraco M. Lymph node metastases in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:45-53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Henderson DW. Malignant Mesothelioma. In: Jahannessen JV, ed. The Cancer Series. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1992:69-139.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matsuo T, Ito H, Anami M, Ikeda T, Nishihata S. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma with squamous metaplasia. Cytopathology. 1993;4:373-378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mayall FG, Gibbs AR. The histology and immunohistochemistry of small cell mesothelioma. Histopathology. 1992;20:47-51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ordonez NG. Mesothelioma with clear cell features: an ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study of 20 cases. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:465-473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang HT, Yantiss RK, Nielsen GP, McKee GT, Mark EJ. Lipid-rich diffuse malignant mesothelioma: a case report. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:876-879.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Klebe S, Mahar A, Henderson DW, Roggli VL. Malignant mesothelioma with heterologous elements: clinicopathological correlation of 27 cases and literature review. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:1084-1094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson GE, Hasleton PS, Chatterjee AK. Desmoplastic malignant mesothelioma: a review of 17 cases. J Clin Pathol. 1992;45:295-298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ishikawa R, Kikuchi E, Jin M, et al. Desmoplastic malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: autopsy reveals asbestos exposure. Pathol Int. 2003;53:401-406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yao DX, Shia J, Erlandson RA, Klimstra DS. Lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma: a clinical, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of four cases and literature review. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2004;28:213-228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Henderson DW, Attwood HD, Constance TJ, Shilkin KB, Steele RH. Lymphohistiocytoid mesothelioma: a rare lymphomatoid variant of predominantly sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1988;12:367-384.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shia J, Erlandson RA, Klimstra DS. Deciduoid mesothelioma: a report of 5 cases and literature review. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2002;26:355-363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shanks JH, Harris M, Banerjee SS, et al. Mesotheliomas with deciduoid morphology: a morphologic spectrum and a variant not confined to young females. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:285-294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ordonez NG. Epithelial mesothelioma with deciduoid features: report of four cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:816-823.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Azzopardi JG. Oat-cell carcinoma of the bronchus. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1959;78:513-519.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Talerman A, Montero JR, Chilcote RR, Okagaki T. Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma in a 13-year-old girl. Report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9:73-80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Renshaw AA, Dean BR, Antman KH, Sugarbaker DJ, Cibas ES. The role of cytologic evaluation of pleural fluid in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Chest. 1997;111:106-109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nguyen GK. Cytopathology of pleural mesotheliomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114(Suppl):S68-S81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rakha EA, Patil S, Abdulla K, Abdulkader M, Chaudry Z, Soomro IN. The sensitivity of cytologic evaluation of pleural fluid in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38:874-879.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tao LC. The cytopathology of mesothelioma. Acta Cytol. 1979;23:209-213.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Papanicolaou GN, ed. Atlas of Exfoliative Cytology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Naylor B. The exfoliative cytology of diffuse malignant mesothelioma. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1963;86:293-298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Roberts GH, Campbell GM. Exfoliative cytology of diffuse mesothelioma. J Clin Pathol. 1972;25:577-582.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Whitaker D, Shilkin KB. The cytology of malignant mesothelioma in Western Australia. Acta Cytol. 1978;22:67-70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ehya H. The cytologic diagnosis of mesothelioma. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1986;3:196-203.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bedrossian CW, Bonsib S, Moran C. Differential diagnosis between mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma: a multimodal approach based on ultrastructure and immunocytochemistry. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1992;9:124-140.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kho-Duffin J, Tao LC, Cramer H, Catellier MJ, Irons D, Ng P. Cytologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, with particular emphasis on the epithelial noncohesive cell type. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;20:57-62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Patel NP, Taylor CA, Levine EA, Trupiano JK, Geisinger KR. Cytomorphologic features of primary peritoneal mesothelioma in effusion, washing, and fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens: examination of 49 cases at one institution, including post-intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy findings. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;128:414-422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Whitaker D. Cell aggregates in malignant mesothelioma. Acta Cytol. 1977;21:236-239.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Gillespie FR, van der Walt JD, Derias N, Kenney A. Deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma. A report of the cytological appearances. Cytopathology. 2001;12:57-61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ikeda K, Suzuki T, Tate G, Mitsuya T. Cytomorphologic features of well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma in peritoneal effusion: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:512-515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hejmadi R, Ganesan R, Kamal NG. Malignant transformation of a well-differentiated peritoneal papillary mesothelioma. Acta Cytol. 2003;47:517-518.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Cook DS, Attanoos RL, Jalloh SS, Gibbs AR. ‘Mucin-positive’ epithelial mesothelioma of the peritoneum: an unusual diagnostic pitfall. Histopathology. 2000;37:33-36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Triol JH, Conston AS, Chandler SV. Malignant mesothelioma. Cytopathology of 75 cases seen in a New Jersey community hospital. Acta Cytol. 1984;28:37-45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Whitaker D, Shilkin KB. Diagnosis of pleural malignant mesothelioma in life–a practical approach. J Pathol. 1984;143:147-175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Welker L, Muller M, Holz O, Vollmer E, Magnussen H, Jorres RA. Cytological diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma–improvement by additional analysis of hyaluronic acid in pleural effusions. Virchows Arch. 2007;450:455-461.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ordonez NG. What are the current best immunohistochemical markers for the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma? A review and update. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1-16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Beasley MB. Immunohistochemistry of pulmonary and pleural neoplasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:1062-1072.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ordonez NG. The diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in distinguishing between peritoneal mesotheliomas and serous carcinomas: a comparative study. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:34-48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Portugal R, Oliva E. Calretinin: diagnostic utility in the female genital tract. Adv Anat Pathol. 2009;16:118-124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Hanna A, Pang Y, Bedrossian CW, Dejmek A, Michael CW. Podoplanin is a useful marker for identifying mesothelioma in malignant effusions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38:264-269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Saad RS, Lindner JL, Lin X, Liu YL, Silverman JF. The diagnostic utility of D2–40 for malignant mesothelioma versus pulmonary carcinoma with pleural involvement. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34:801-806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bassarova AV, Nesland JM, Davidson B. D2–40 is not a specific marker for cells of mesothelial origin in serous effusions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:878-882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ascoli V, Scalzo CC, Taccogna S, Nardi F. The diagnostic value of thrombomodulin immunolocalization in serous effusions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995;119:1136-1140.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Pu RT, Pang Y, Michael CW. Utility of WT-1, p63, MOC31, mesothelin, and cytokeratin (K903 and CK5/6) immunostains in differentiating adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant mesothelioma in effusions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:20-25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Fetsch PA, Simsir A, Abati A. Comparison of antibodies to HBME-1 and calretinin for the detection of mesothelial cells in effusion cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;25:158-161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Mimura T, Ito A, Sakuma T, et al. Novel marker D2–40, combined with calretinin, CEA, and TTF-1: an optimal set of immunodiagnostic markers for pleural mesothelioma. Cancer. 2007;109:933-938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lozano MD, Panizo A, Toledo GR, Sola JJ, Pardo-Mindan J. Immunocytochemistry in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions: a comparative evaluation of eight monoclonal antibodies in Papanicolaou stained smears. Cancer. 2001;93:68-72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Wiseman W, Michael CW, Roh MH. Diagnostic utility of PAX8 and PAX2 immunohistochemistry in the identification of metastatic Mullerian carcinoma in effusions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010 October 14 [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sack MJ, Roberts SA. Cytokeratins 20 and 7 in the differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma in cytologic specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997;16:132-136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ordonez NG. The diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between epithelioid mesotheliomas and squamous carcinomas of the lung: a comparative study. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:417-428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hasteh F, Lin GY, Weidner N, Michael CW. The use of immunohistochemistry to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in cytologic effusions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118:90-96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Saad RS, Cho P, Liu YL, Silverman JF. The value of epithelial membrane antigen expression in separating benign mesothelial proliferation from malignant mesothelioma: a comparative study. Diagn Cytopathol. 2005;32:156-159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sivertsen S, Berner A, Michael CW, Bedrossian C, Davidson B. Cadherin expression in ovarian carcinoma and malignant mesothelioma cell effusions. Acta Cytol. 2006;50:603-607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Simsir A, Fetsch P, Mehta D, Zakowski M, Abati A. E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and calretinin in pleural effusions: the good, the bad, the worthless. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;20:125-130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Mutsaers SE. The mesothelial cell. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:9-16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Kimura N, Dota K, Araya Y, Ishidate T, Ishizaka M. Scoring system for differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma and reactive mesothelial cells on cytology specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 2009;37:885-890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Cakir E, Demirag F, Aydin M, Unsal E. Cytopathologic differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells: a logistic regression analysis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2009;37:4-10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ordonez NG. Value of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing peritoneal mesothelioma from serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum: a review and update. Adv Anat Pathol. 2006;13:16-25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Davidson B, Risberg B, Kristensen G, et al. Detection of cancer cells in effusions from patients diagnosed with gynaecological malignancies. Evaluation of five epithelial markers. Virchows Arch. 1999;435:43-49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Ordonez NG. Value of estrogen and progesterone receptor immunostaining in distinguishing between peritoneal mesotheliomas and serous carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:1163-1167.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire W. Michael M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michael, C.W. (2012). Malignant Mesothelioma. In: Davidson, B., Firat, P., Michael, C. (eds) Serous Effusions. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-697-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-697-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-696-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-697-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics